Talk:San Francisco General Hospital

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hospitals High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ward 5B/5A

This article references a ward 86 in relation to HIV/AIDS. However in the documentary We Were Here, they say that 5B was the first AIDS ward in the world, and then later it was moved to 5A. Is 86 a separate ward, or a renumbered ward? It didn't come up at all in the film. 24.57.210.141 (talk) 03:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COI

A major contributor to this page, User:SFGHDeansOffice has a user name which leads me to believe that he or she is associated with San Francisco General Hospital. They haven't posted since August, but their edits are a conflict of interest. Paris1127 (talk) 21:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... indeed, it looks like at least the entire section on the Kahlo/Rivera paintings is a direct copy and paste from the UCSF web page on the topic: https://sfgh.ucsf.edu/frida-kahlo-diego-rivera-sfgh

I'm not sure the copyright status of that (it may be public domain as a government work), but in any case it's probably not good practice for the encyclopedia. (Also, as a reminder, the link included as a reference no longer works, due to redirection loop errors.) Npdoty (talk) 04:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible image

The history section could potentially be enlivened by using this picture under PD-SCAN rationales, but I have not looked deeply into the history/origin of the photo yet. LuisVilla (talk) 15:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Name and renaming of Hospital

WP's policy on what names are used for articles about corporations states that "Whenever possible, common usage is preferred". Well, "San Francisco General Hospital" has existed under that name for over 150 years, and to the City's current 800,000 residents, that is its name. No one other than Zuckerberg and some of the administrators at the Hospital refer to it as the "Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital". As it currently is listed, it just causes confusion amongst WP users. Consequently, unless someone can justify the deviation from WP's policy, I'm going to revert the title of the article back to "San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center". As per WP:NCCORP -- "Regardless of the article title, the first sentence of the article should normally begin with the full legal name of the company, so the first sentence in the article will show the full name. Bricology (talk) 18:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do the wiki men believe will be gained by the lengthy duration of the 'redirect' message? 166.199.116.69 (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]