This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
I have removed the Proposed Deletion template, as i believe the book has enough nontrivial coverage to be potentially notable, despite obvious flaws with the article. to be clear, this is not simply a common travel guide (which would pretty much automatically disqualify it for an article), but an original history of this important ethnic enclave, published by City Lights, which, while not a major (ie moneyed) publisher, restricts itself exclusively to serious works of literature and culture. Since i have not provided enough new references (yet) to clearly establish notability beyond doubt, i would recommend that this book be taken to WP:Articles for deletion for further consideration.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]