Talk:Royal Palace of Caserta

Italy High‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kingdom of Naples (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kingdom of Naples, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Kingdom of NaplesWikipedia:WikiProject Kingdom of NaplesTemplate:WikiProject Kingdom of NaplesKingdom of Naples articles

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

World Heritage Sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

Someone with more confidence than grasp of nuance moved Palace of Caserta to Caserta Palace..." like other palaces around the world that use the english term "palace" in the title". Such as Versaillespalace and Louvrepalace, no doubt. --Wetman 16:31, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks are due to User:Gryffindor for making the change back that I'd not dared to.--Wetman (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Total surface

In the network there are in fact only information about the encumbrance of the structure itself, ie 47000 square meters (the royal palace has in fact a side of 247 meters in length and the other of 190 meters, for a result precisely of 46930 square meters) This result however it should be multiplied by the 5 floors of the palace, to arrive at a more probable result of 160 thousand square meters approximately. This figure was obtained by subtracting the 47.000 square meters overall size of the 15000 square meters of the four inner courts (each 3848 square meters wide, being side rectangles of 74x52 meters) obtaining the "net" surface of each plan, ie 31600 meters. 31600 square meters for 5 floors it gives a result of 160 thousand square meters approximately. To get a sense of the enormous size of the Palace unjustly considered to 47,000 square meters, the Palace of Versailles in France has "only" 67 thousand square meters, ie not even half of the surface summarily calculated by me of 160 thousand square meters, or with the Royal Palace in Madrid, also of five floors and with a nominal surface of 135 thousand square meters, but Caserta is visibly larger. 82.57.17.215 (talk) 00:34, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, in most of the building there are large rooms that occupy 2 floors (clearly visible from the section), as well as the gallery on the ground floor. I think the real floor area is a lot less than 160 thousand square meters.--Podz00 (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Palace of Caserta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141019204401/http://www.reggiadicaserta.beniculturali.it/index.php/guida-alla-reggia.html to http://www.reggiadicaserta.beniculturali.it/index.php/guida-alla-reggia.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]