Talk:Roma Bakery
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]@Melcous: Please review this article again and review citation #3, that should now go here. Once you review it and can see the full notability claims, please remove the Notability tag. Greg Henderson (talk) 06:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Greghenderson2006: this is a primary document about the building for the purposes of entering it onto the Register of Historic buildings. However, WP:NBUILDING makes clear that
Buildings, including private residences, transportation facilities and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability
. I do not see how this requirement for "significant in-depth coverage" by third party sources has been met. Tagging @Theroadislong: who approved the draft as they may have a different view. Melcous (talk) 06:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)- Here is my analysis:
- Primary source This is the historical study that was done for the building. Rather long and rather extensive.
- Secondary source Clicking on the NRHP number in the Infobox will bring up the secondary source information presented by the National Register of Historic Places, which is part of Wikipedia's Portal:National Register of Historic Places. This includes listings on the state-county-city levels as well.
- So, I have tried to include all the sources that will pass WP:GNG, and do not see any reason to place a Notability tag on the Roma Bakery article.
- Greg Henderson (talk) 16:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Here is my analysis:
Cherry picked
[edit]@Left guide: Sources align with the WP:NBUILDING guidelines as a result of its historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. Clearly meets WP:GEOFEAT (Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable. Greg Henderson (talk) 17:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request - Roma Bakery as notability tag
[edit]- Please remove notability tag.
- Roma Bakery is notable per WP:GEOFEAT: Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable.
Categories:
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/07 November 2023
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance