Jump to content

Talk:Robinson–Dadson curves

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

confused

[edit]

There are two significantly different graphs, with both the same labels on the axes and description. Shouldnt it explain somewhere what the difference is? 217.166.90.180 09:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look again - the descriptions are different! One is clearly marked Robinson-Dadson and the other Fletcher-Munson. The debate over the difference is fully described here and on the associated pages. Both are compared with the new ISO standard, which supercedes them. --Lindosland 13:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does this page need to exist?

[edit]

Is there a good reason why this page doesn't rollup/redirect to "equal-loudness contour", the way "Fletcher-Munson curves" does currently? The language of this article is kind of redundant to the page for "equal-loudness contour"?

98.175.35.148 (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram does not show Robinson–Dadson curves

[edit]

The one and only diagram in this article does not show the subject of the article but something else, which is confusing. The diagram only shows the Fletcher-Munson curves and the ISO curves revised in 2003, which replaced the Robinson-Dadson curves. In the versions of this article by 2011, there is a diagram depicting the Robinson-Dadson curves. However, its left scale has numbers printed above each other. I do not know how to remove or correct the overlapping numbers, but would like to suggest to use that diagram. 2A02:8109:B615:C500:3923:90A8:2473:F90 (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]