Talk:Robert Mecklenborg

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Mecklenborg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

DUI Incident

WL requires good references and not links to rumors in blogs and facebook pages. Get a good source for the blood test results. Also Viagra has other uses then just erectile dysfunction, is it likely? Yes, but we need good references that the blood test actually showed the medication and we need to know what the medication was used for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kilowattradio (talk • contribs) 12:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The abortion subject has nothing to do with the DUI incident. Mixing the two in the same section doesn't seem apporiate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kilowattradio (talk • contribs) 00:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Viagra information is contained in the AP story published in the Chicago Tribune, a reference that Chinacat7 has repeatedly removed. Skywriter (talk) 11:57, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The material citing the Chicago Tribune was removed due to inaccurate reporting.— Preceding unsigned comment added by NTLwr12 (talk • contribs)

The Chicago Tribune article was not accurately represented in previous versions. That reference was removed in accordance with the standards set by Wikipedia's Biographies of Living Persons. Chinacat7 (talk) 15:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source and Mugshot

--91.39.99.159 (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Substituting personal opinion for accurately quoted commentary

Kilowattradio has erred in deleting commentary about these events.

When the Associated Press reported this story, it quoted the Ohio director Kelly Copeland. Editors at The Chicago Tribune, the Cleveland Plain Dealer and the AP decided the material Kilowattradio wants deleted is relevant. I've been away for awhile but unless something drastic has transpired in the meantime, Wikipedia is not in the business of censoring viewpoints. Skywriter (talk) 21:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sanitizing

Chinacat7 has repeatedly removed references to Chicago Tribune and other stories about this subject. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Chinacat7

Chinacat7's sole contributions to Wikipedia is this sanitizing activity. Skywriter (talk) 11:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Chinacat7 put an entry on WP:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive123#Robert Mecklenborg. Davemck (talk) 16:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The information was removed due to an insufficient reference. According to Wikipedia's regulations, such material is to be removed immediately.— Preceding unsigned comment added by NTLwr12 (talk • contribs)

References to the Chicago Tribune and other stories were removed due to inaccurate reporting. Such material must be deleted immediately. All deletions were made in accordance with Wikipedia regulations. Chinacat7 (talk) 15:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chinacat7 cites no "regulation" or "regulations" to support the above statements, which are false. The Associated Press and the Chicago Tribune are well-regarded sources of information for Wikipedia citations. It should be again noted that Chinacat7's only activity on Wikipedia is to sanitize this article by removing well-sourced references from it. The same is equally true of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/NTLwr12 who has absolutely no history on Wikipedia except the removal of references from this article and only this article. This is a splendid example of how Wikipedia is manipulated for political gain. Skywriter (talk) 20:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]