User talk:Kilowattradio

Welcome

Hello, Kilowattradio, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CWC(talk) 01:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Power Hour, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tikiwont 09:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your talk page posts.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Goodnightmush 21:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nada Nadim Prouty

You seem to have re-insterted a non-notable, POV source into this BLP after it was taken out. This must be removed, and I'll do it. Please review WP:RS to identify reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor; O'Reilly article

First, please don't mark edits as minor where you make substantial changes to the content. Minor edits are those that make minor changes to spelling, punctuation, or syntax without changing the underlying content. When you remove or add content, your edit is not minor.

Second, what you say in this edit summary is false. The wording in the source is very similar to the wording in the article. Had you just done ctrl-f for "millions," you'd have found it. Please be more careful. Croctotheface (talk) 23:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. No deception involved. 99% of my edits are minor so I checked it out of habit. A statement by a writer of a web blog article is not a reliable source for information. If you have someone on the record saying they settled for millions or actual court records then that would be a credible source. Kilowattradio (talk) 22:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That statement is also false. The source is not a "web blog article"; it is a column in the Washington Post. Croctotheface (talk) 21:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reference was to a smoking gun artilce not to the washington post article and that is why I removed it. If you have a good reference then put it back in.

The reference IN THE ARTICLE is this: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7578-2004Oct28.html . I am running out of good faith here. Croctotheface (talk) 04:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

put the reference in the article. The reference for that sentence points to a smoking gun weblog article not to WASHPO article. Kilowattradio (talk) 00:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason I had # 92 instead of 93. Hmm Ok my bad I hit the SG article instead of the WAPO article. Live & learn Kilowattradio (talk) 00:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinarily I'd just drop this, but I have to ask--did you just think I was lying? I wrote "IN THE ARTICLE" in big capital letters, and your response was "put the reference in the article"? Croctotheface (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No I was looking at the wrong reference number. It was just a flub on my part. I will be more careful in the future.

May 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Andrew Napolitano. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Truthsort (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gretchen Carlson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 23:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Juan Williams, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. You wrote: "It was sexual harrassment, not verbal harrassment." Actually, all of the sources call it verbal sexual harassment. And they refer to them as allegations or accusations. According to those sources, Williams merely offered an apology. Viriditas (talk) 13:58, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An apology is an admission.

MSNBC

With regards to your recent removals of content, please note that logo use is allowed in accordance with the fair use policy, and that television schedules are permitted for national networks (see other examples here and here). ~~In the future, please discuss potential changes that remove significant content.~~ Thanks! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Christie

Hi there. I noticed you removed a statement in the Chris Christie article, on the basis that "Encyclopedia articles shouldn't include predictions." I very much agree that they shouldn't, but it didn't look to me like the Christie article did in the first place - the whole purpose of the encyclopedia is to describe views from an objective point of view, and it looked to me like that's what the article was doing. In point of fact, it is true that "Some view Christie as a future contender for the Republican Presidential nomination in 2016"; it would be a problem if the article said "Christie will probably run for President in 2016," or even "Christie is widely expected to run," but I don't think there's anything unencyclopedic about acknowledging an analysis advanced by several reliable sources. Anyways, if you really think the article shouldn't mention 2016, this sounds like a perfect instance of WP:BRD - you've been bold (which I do, I assure you, commend you for), I've challenged that bold action, and you should feel free to bring the issue up on the article's talk page, so we can get some wider input on the matter. Thanks. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 06:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nada nadim prouty.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Nada nadim prouty.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Kilowattradio!

Happy New Year!

Hello Kilowattradio:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, BusterD (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

File source problem with File:Nada nadim prouty.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nada nadim prouty.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 02:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]