This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
GBIF offer a citation so that anyone citing a page at GBIF can simply copy/paste it into another document, fiddle with formatting, and Bob's yer uncle. Their suggested format is not a requirement; and even if it were, what can they do to us if we do not comply?
For cs1|2
|via= is used to hold the name of a source provider other than the publisher so was misused here
GBIF do not name authors for these pages so we should not contrive a name simply to 'fill in the blanks'
clearly the GBIF database is not a book so should not be cited as such
the value assigned to |doi= is not unique; it does not take the reader to the particular page where the data that supports the Wikipedia article's text can be found, so for readers, doi is mostly useless