Talk:Rhodesian Air Force Ensign

A fact from Rhodesian Air Force Ensign appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Royal Rhodesian Air Force Ensign originally had three assegais, but this was reduced to one following the break-up of the Federation?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rhodesian Air Force Ensign.

Wikipedia

Heraldry and vexillology

Rhodesian Air Force Ensign is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

Military history: Aviation / Culture / African / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	African military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Zimbabwe: Rhodesia

Rhodesian Air Force Ensign is within the scope of WikiProject Zimbabwe, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.ZimbabweWikipedia:WikiProject ZimbabweTemplate:WikiProject ZimbabweZimbabwe articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Rhodesia task force.

WikiProject Zimbabwe open tasks:

Tasks clipboard

Zimbabwe-related tasks

You can help!

Zimbabwe

Requests: Ruwa Scout Park, Central African Jamboree, Bulawayo Asian Civil Rights League, Rhodesia Bantu Voters Association, Nyasaland Chiefs Conference, Nyasaland African National Congress, Monarchy of Rhodesia, more...
Stubs: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, Econet Wireless, Khame Ruins, Wildlife of Zimbabwe Category:Zimbabwe stubs
Category sorting:
Verify or Factual Accuracy:
Update:
NPOV :
Citations:
Copyedit, Style or Cleanup:
Expand:
Related Wikiprojects: Wikipedia:WikiProject Zimbabwe - Zimbabwe-related topics notice board - Collaboration Project

view • edit • discuss • history • watch

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 13:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Royal Rhodesian Air Force Ensign

... that the Royal Rhodesian Air Force Ensign (pictured) originally had three assegais but was reduced to one following the Federal break-up? Source: War in the Air: Rhodesian Air Force, 1935-1980. Galago. p. 39. ISBN 9780947020132.

Reviewed: Barnet Gate

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 07:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi The C of E, review follows: article created 7 July; article exceeds minimum length and is cited inline throughout to what appear to be reliable sources; I don't have access to all of the sources but found no issues with overly close paraphrasing from the ones I could access; hook is interesting to me, mentioned in the article; I am happy to offline AGF that the source backs up the hook; image is used in the article, works well at scale and is freely licensed by the creator; a QPQ has been carried out - Dumelow (talk) 08:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]