Talk:Return to Never Land

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Return to Never Land article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: British / War / American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Animation studios owned by The Walt Disney Company#Disney Animation|Walt Disney Animation Australia]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Um, the octopus and the crocodile never met

In Return to Never Land the crocodile was replaced by an orange octopus for no apparent reason. It is now believed that since the crocodile was killed (we see it on Hook), the octopus, who was the crocodile's best friend, is determined to kill Hook for revenge.

I'm sorry, but whoever wrote this is terribly mistaken for several reasons. First of all, the crocodile and the octopus never met. There was never any indication of them once knowing one another. Also, Return To Never Land is a sequel to the 1950s Disney version of Peter Pan...not a sequel to Hook. Even though Captian Hook does say he got rid of the crocodile, he never said that he killed it. For all we know, he could've just somehow driven the crocodile away or captured him. The reason why the octopus went after Captain Hook was explained in the film. Hook was going to sacrifice Jane (whom Hook thought was Wendy) to the octopus (called "the beast" in the film) for food. But, due to Peter Pan and Tinkerbell's pixie dust, the octopus ended up landing on Hook and Hook ended up inside the octopus's mouth. Much like the crocodile, the octopus liked the taste of Hook and decided to persue him in order to devour the evil pirate.

--24.111.137.236 23:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Anonymous.[reply]

I have to agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.129.135.81 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Box office

I don't see anything for box office. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.70.218.215 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

69.0.41.239 made a bunch of changes to this entry, some of which (changing Danny to a girl) are vandalism, while some (adding Andrew McDonough are valid). Does someone want to read the thing carefully to take out the bad edits, as well as tighten it up a bit?Cheeselouise 05:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack

The page's listing of the soundtrack was rather screwed up, including listing Jeff Bennett as the singer of "I'll Try (Reprise)" instead of Jonatha Brooke. Brooke was listed as the singer of "So To Be One of Us" and "Hook and the Lost Boys" instead of the tracks she did contribute ("I'll Try," "I'll Try (Reprise)," and "Second Star to the Right." I went ahead and fixed it. KyrieEleison (talk) 04:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg

Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worst Sequel Ever

This movie is cheesy and Jane has a pain scream. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.116.44 (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings

Lots of people think this was a terrible movie, that's why it's hard to find in stores. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.224.17.135 (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Differences from the novel section

In this edit an IP removed the "Differences from the novel" section. (It has since been reverted) They did not provide an explanation, shame on them, but if I were to guess, it's because the removed content represents an unsourced analysis of differences between the film and the book, with an emphasis on unsourced. Though some facts can be directly observed "Character A was not in the novel" there are some interpretive comparisons: The paragraph claims that one character is depicted as more tomboyish, it states that this film is more properly a sequel to the 1953 film, not the novel, etc. that kind of stuff constitutes WP:OR. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Who?

Wendy is reconciled with Danny, but he's not been introduced. Shite writing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.133.10.249 (talk • contribs) 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Maybe you could try improving it. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Return to Never Land. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/65u92Kono?url=http://youngartistawards.org/noms24.htm to http://youngartistawards.org/noms24.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]