Talk:Red River Delta
This level-5 vital article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Vietnam may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Proposed merge into Dong Bang Song Hong
[edit]The article Vietnam links the Western name "Red River Delta" to the Vietnamese name "Dong Bang Song Hong". Askari Mark (Talk) 18:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Needs literal meaning
[edit]"Đồng Bằng Sông Hồng" needs literal meaning. Badagnani 04:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Translate
[edit]How was Hồng translated as Red. 69.234.183.155 (talk) 21:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- See 紅. Badagnani (talk) 07:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Red River (Asia) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hong River which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hong River which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Population source details
[edit]Dear User:Remsense, about your recent edit: 1222167034.
I think in this case, more details is necessary because: (1) The source is an interactive table; (2) To make clear about Year info of the source. In the future, if someone wants to update the figure, they only need to update the Year info.
Thanks. Zywk (talk) 10:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do not think any level of interactivity in itself is necessary to explain in a reference footnote, as long as it's generally understood by an audience. I would say the average Wikipedia reader is likely able to comfortably make use of the source. Remsense诉 10:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)