Talk:Recording
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Stop adding link to a disambiguation page
[edit]To the anonymous editor(s) who insist on re-adding the wikilink on the word "process" in the opening sentence: links within articles should not point to a disambiguation page, they should instead point directly to the most appropriate article. In this case, none of the articles listed on the disambiguation page for "process" are relevant to the context of this article. Should you care to read up, see WP:DISAMBIG or WP:OVERLINK. This particular case clearly falls under "avoid linking plain English words." If you feel there is a particular Wikipedia article which would be helpful, feel free to add the correct link. But please don't continue to link to a disambiguation page simply to provide a definition of the word. LarryJeff (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
What're you talking about? Process is a normal article that explains the word, not a disambiguation page. But I agree that a plain word that everyone understands shouldn't be linked. Pagen HD (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
No mention of film and television recording
[edit]This article should be organised into subsections, each providing a link to its respective Main Article. And film/television should be added. Pagen HD (talk) 10:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]This was not taking shape as a stand-alone article so I WP:BOLDly salvaged what I could and redirected to Record. ~Kvng (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- This has been reverted by R'n'B with edit comment, "you can't merge a sourced article into a disambiguation page." As part of my salvage, I merged the "sources" in the Further reading section into Sound recording and reproduction. All of the material in this article is covered better in the articles linked to at Record. As it stands this article is trying to cover multiple topics so it probably should be converted to a disambig but that's not necessary since one (Record) already exists. I'll restore my changed in a few days if there are no further objections. ~Kvng (talk) 14:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- If you do go ahead with this, please be aware of WP:FIXDABLINKS. There are a number of other articles that contain links to Recording that will need to be fixed before the page is redirected. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- That's a good point. I'll make sure to restore these changes when I also have time to sort out all the incoming links. It looks like most of these should lead readers to Sound recording and reproduction. Is there any other reason I should not go ahead with this? ~Kvng (talk) 20:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- If you do go ahead with this, please be aware of WP:FIXDABLINKS. There are a number of other articles that contain links to Recording that will need to be fixed before the page is redirected. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
'Not taking shape'
[edit]Agreed it's not taking shape as an article. It remains a collection of mostly common-sense and obvious observations, with (as a result) very little encyclopedic value. In short, it sucks.
First of all, 'recording' can be a noun or a verb.
Secondly, the definition of 'recording' in the lede (as a process which collects a dynamic, time-changing series of images) is a misfit for the 'history' section ... which only refers to static recordings ... paintings, books ... which predate the technical definition in the lede ... and stops there. (Edison anyone?)
Thirdly (and I could go on), there's no recognition of the cultural or technological development of 'process' recordings which collect images of a series of events, audio or visual. Enough examples.
So, yeah, I agree with the sentiment that the article is an embarrassment as it stands, and wouldn't be missed if it was deleted. On the other hand, a more general, polished, well-thought-out article on the topic should be present. Twang (talk) 00:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- I have restored my merge, this article is now a redirect to Record. ~Kvng (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Datu Wata Eduardo Lihao Danda
[edit]Datu Wata Eduardo T. Danda,]] (March 22, 1920 – May 02, 2014 ) was a guerrilla on World War II, Call of duty 42-Medical Detachment 106th Infantry USAFFE last January 3, 1942 with rank of Private First Class , May 15 1942 captured by Japanese Royal Army detained in Camp 78 Davao Del Sur Philippines, September 1, 1943 escaped and hide in benders zamboanga, September 14, 1944 rejoined the 45-Medical Detachment 121st Infantry 10ND USAFFE in Curuan Zamboanga Philippines under the command of Capt. Castillo. After WWII he integrated to Philippines Constabulary and retired in Sept. 1971.
Married to Ms. Aquilina Pandac Dapat, he fall in love in first sight the 17 years old pretty girl daughter of Mr. Francisco Laure Dapat and Mrs. Antonieta Pandac from Misamis city, Mrs Aquilina D. Danda bored 15 children.
Datu Wata Eduardo Lihao Danda, he is the youngest son of Thimuay Danda Antanao and Thalina Lihao Danda, he has bother Datu Lamparan Lihao Danda , Andrenico Lihao Danda and sister Ghintanah Lihao Danda, and the Thimuay Danda Antanao re-married to youngest sister of Thalimah she died at early age, The sister of Thalima Lihao Danda with name of Ghenisay Lihao married to Thimuay Danda Antanao bored children Filixberto Lihao Danda, Maria Lihao Danda, Arturo Lihao Danda, Josefa Lihao Danda and Solomon Lihao Danda,
Datu Wata Eduardo Lihao Danda, during his teen age days he very adventurer and went to rain forest of kabasalan 4km from road with his 1st cousin Mindal Sanglad and mark the land want too. Thimauy Danda Antanao one of the prominent family and aborigin in Manucipality of KabasalanHe sent Datu Lamparan and Datu Wata Eduardo Danda in Brent School of Zamboanga city, 250km from ho,e town in 1942 up to grade 7