Talk:Rapunzel (Tangled)

Rapunzel (Tangled) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 12, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
September 16, 2013	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rapunzel (Tangled) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Films Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

United States: Animation / Cinema Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Tangled#Franchise|Tangled: The Musical]] The anchor (#Franchise) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Started page, after the Title Princess Rapunzel would redirect towards Tangled. In need of Pictures (for the Infobox and the Article in general) name of Animater for Rapunzel, and References. --Ajitter89 (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linked Tangled and Disney Princess pages to this page, added The Disney Princess Info Box to page added small details to the page like Categories and A Small part of Physical Description. --Ajitter89 (talk) 23:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Development Section has been in need of Expansion for a while now, and again in desperate need of pictures, especially A profile Picture--Ajitter89 (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rapunzell IS added

http://www.disney.co.uk/princess/rapunzel/rapunzel-celebration/ --2.218.21.231 (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect information?

Where did it ever say in the film or the short that "Rapunzel was pregnant 6 months later."? I'm positive this was never said.

71.171.126.127 (talk) 01:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's what's known as vandalism. Please check the article history and revert such changes when you find them. Powers ^T 13:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Rapunzel was not pregnant 6 months later Nomsese (talk) 10:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Picture?

I know that it's difficult to find a picture without violating copyright of a fairly new Disney character, but currently, the top image is NOT what Rapunzel appears in the movie. Perhaps someone change the label? LovelyEdit ^talk_edits —Preceding undated comment added 22:37, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone uploaded a completely different picture over the old one, without specifying a source. I reverted File:Tangled Rapunzel.jpg back to its original form. Powers ^T 13:39, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And shouldn't we make it look like the other Disney Princess profile pictures? jSmith11 (talk) 07:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rapunzel (Disney)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 19:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC) Working on a review.[reply]

For now, I'm questioning the use of Disney Princesses line artwork for the infobox. This clicked in when I was reading about there being only 100 strands of hair: I can't see how that looks, anywhere in the article. Same goes for asymmetry, not represented in the illustration. -- Zanimum (talk) 19:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I agree with you about the Disney Princess publicity image of Rapunzel being used in the infobox. But note that every other Disney Princess article on Wikipedia does uses a similar image, not a screenshot from the film. I'm also aware that most other images would have copyright restrictions. When Glen Keane mentions "asymmetry", he does not mean the Wikipedia definition of it. He simply means that Rapunzel is not 100% perfect. It is clearly sourced by this link: http://www.philonfilm.net/2011/01/interview-glen-keane.html. You can find the direct quote around the middle of the fourth paragraph. And the number 100 is clearly referenced by this link: http://www.npr.org/2012/04/20/151047258/untangling-the-hairy-physics-of-rapunzel. You can find it in the middle of paragraph six.--Changedforbetter (talk) 21:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC) Also, the image, which is a rather outdated concept one possibly from 2007, is not in reference to the use of asymmetry; it, like the tagline reads, simply demonstrates the type of hair Keane wanted.[reply]

FYI, I am coming back to this, just keep on forgetting. It's on a different computer, my mostly-complete review. -- Zanimum (talk) 23:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, it is quite alright. Do take your time :) I'm not gonna lie, however...this is definitely the longest I've ever had to wait for a review...Changedforbetter (talk) 23:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a case of getting this computer connected to the internet... I really need to get the web at home. So, I've started making fairly straight forward edits that I was suggesting in the review. You can take a look at the edit summaries, to see what's what.

Tangled Ever After

“is also aired in Spring 2012” needs fixing. That said, this airing is relevant in the short's article, but why is it relevant to Rapunzel as a character?

Done, both release and air date removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reading/reviewing this article out of order, so Eugene's name threw me. Given that Flynn doesn't have a physical transformation, like the Beast/Prince Adam, I didn't even remember that Flynn wasn't his real name.

Solved: provided brief background information explaining that at the end of the first film Flynn decides to go by his real name Eugene. Also begin the summary by saying Eugene proposes to her in the first film.--Changedforbetter (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything more that can be said of her role in the short, other than marrying? Does it demonstrate any personality traits mentioned in 1.3.1?

I expanded the summary as a whole. Not much changes about Rapunzel except her hair colour, which I mentioned.--Changedforbetter (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Princess and merchandise

Avoid in article external links.

Removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try and post more the of the review tomorrow, I got distracted tonight. I am amazed how many bullets I was able to erase entirely, as you fixed them by your own, between me saying I'd review and me actually posting. Good stuff. -- Zanimum (talk) 01:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Design and characteristics

Were these nine designs of Rapunzel nine CG models? Nine model sheets?
It's not specifically stated. This is the direct quotation from the source: "They came up with nine versions of Rapunzel (five of which were fully animated) before they settled on the final one." By "five of which were fully animated," I assume they mean computer-animated, leaving three four that were either model sheets, storyboards or such. But since that's only an assumption, I felt it better to simply state how many different designs were created. Is that alright?--Changedforbetter (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous

Coronated is a fully valid word, used properly in this sentence. But it is also a weird word. Perhaps “Disney introduces characters to its Disney Princess lineup through “coronations”, of which Rapunzel's was on October 2, 2011. She was the first computer animated princess to be added to the group.” or something. Pretty much anything that avoids the past tense of coronation. Also, is there any reference to how most merchandise with her depicts her as a traditional animation-type cartoon design, as opposed to CG.

Done. Rephrased sentence to better incorporate the word "coronation". Also found a reference for her traditionally animated appearance in Disney merchandise.--Changedforbetter (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For Belle, you've used "Other appearances" as the section name. For Ariel, "In other media". Would you consider establishing a standard for Disney Princess (and perhaps Disney characters in general) articles?

Well, I feel "Miscellaneous" serves a better purpose because it covers a wider variety of topics, such as both merchandise AND Disney theme parks than "Other appearances" and "In other media". I will eventually replace the current subheadings in Ariel and Belle with Miscellaneous.--Changedforbetter (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's it. Even more changes that I had marked down were fixed before I could formally suggest them. You almost caught them all. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic. I'm really glad you're impressed. Thanks for reviewing.--Changedforbetter (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pass! Congrats. -- Zanimum (talk) 01:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thank you so much!!! --Changedforbetter (talk) 18:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rapunzel (Disney). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Kristin Chenoweth in Daniel Swarovski.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

2601:2C7:8D00:3D10:C4A8:C03:9FB1:26DE (talk) 08:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Rapunzel was 18 and Eugene was 24-26. Also the kingdom that Rapunzel was taken from was called Corona.[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamietw (talk) 09:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]