Talk:Raised floor

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Raised Access Computer Floor was copied or moved into Raised floor with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Untitled

The first sentence mentions "server racks, or desks in landscaped office areas." Not clear why these things would ever be put beneath a raised floor, and if they are on TOP of the floor, then that should be clarified, if relevant. Lupinelawyer 15:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the author(s) show a negative bias about the system. One of the many benefits that I have repeatedly come across is ease of access to under-floor systems. The page implies that overhead systems get cleaned regularly and that under-floor maintenence is a much dirtier and more difficult job, which I cannot find literature to support.Sam0018 (talk) 16:08, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Sam0018[reply]

The article never mentions overhead systems or ceilings or within wall systems that I can see. Extra citations never harm if you have some comparing things or saying anything about it. Dmcq (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was to merge Raised Access Computer Floor into Raised Floor. -- Adabhael ^Talk 19:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging Raised Access Computer Floor into this page, as they are two terms for the same system. Raised Access Computer floor has less content and is a more specific term, so it seems to fall nicely under the more inclusive umbrella of Raised floor. Adabhael (talk) 18:55, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Support yes I fully agree. I can't see any point in having both and there seems litle in the way of extra useful information in the other article to carry over. Dmcq (talk) 21:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dmcq I went ahead and did the merge I hope I got all the steps right, although there is something odd going on with the from_oldid in the copied template. Adabhael ^Talk 19:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed those - they require the full url. Dmcq (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.