Talk:Rahul Dravid/Archive 1

neutrality disputed

yes...there is no point in comparing dravid with tendulkar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhav1992 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Neutrality disputed

Painful to read, incomprehensible and extremely biased and utterly useless. Please consider a re-write. I am unable to edit because it seems protected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kadavill (talk • contribs) 08:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

The article reads absolutely fine, and reflects well on a player who is a class act. It is ridiculous to rubbish Dravid by saying that he is not as good as Tendulkar. Both are greats of modern game and Dravid's statistics are only a little behind those of Tendulkar; indeed Dravid has taken almost twice the number of catches as Tendulkar. Both men conduct themselves in exemplary fashion, and would be an automatic pick for any team of any era. TonyAustria (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC).

ball tampering

Why is this significant? It was never taken seriously because the gum accidentally fell on the ball.Not something that attracts criticism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.11.47.21 (talk) 15:45, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

copyright

To the user who added this article:

The Wikipedia has a strict copyright policy. Unless the author of any material agrees to release it into the public domain or under the GNU Free Documentation License, it has come out of copyright, or it comes under fair use, we can't use that material. Factual material cannot be copyrighted, and so the tabled information is ok, but that description can be and is copyright Wisden and I doubt they've given permission for use. See Wikipedia:copyrights for more information.

The Wall

The article states that the wall is borrowed from an ad,i am not so sure,Jammy was from an ad,can somebody who is sure about this just tell me which ad it is.Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prateek01 (talk • contribs)

The nickname comes from the fact that he played for the India Cements team (A second division team) for some time. I do not know of any TV/Newspaper commercial/Ad where Dravid appeas for India Cements. But It is well known that the name comes from this.

I strongly believe that the article is now neutral. So, shouldn't the tag be removed now?

Bias

A talented (even great) batsman, no doubt. But really, those first 3 paragraphs in the section "Dravid's style" reads like fan mail. I'm not quoting eveything that I found objectionable, but here's a sample...

"In cricket a player is judged by his performances in unfamilar conditions. Rahul is best when he plays in unfamilar conditions, backed by his sound technique, tempermant and attitude." (Source? Statistics?)

"Rahul Dravid is regarded as one of the brilliant thinkers of the game." (Source?)

"He has almost always saved the Indian team from bad phases by performing at his best, as he is the most dependable and consistent player India has ever produced." (People like Sunil Gavaskar, Kapil Dev and Sachin Tendulkar might want to dispute that one.)

"Arguably the best Indian batsman of his era..." (There is a certain Sachin Tendulkar who belongs to Dravid's era, you know.)

• I am not fan of Rahul Dravid. But I find everything that quoted in that article to be true!! I love Sachin..I feel that he is the best thing to happen to Indian Cricket for the past century...but even Sachin can't steal Rahul's share of glory.... Rahul Dravid has definetly been India's Most Successful player Overseas...and has played a major role in India's good performances both outside and inside India in the recent past. We do need to given the Devil its due!!! - PSRAMANUJ

My opinion is that Tendulkar is the greatest batsman produced by India. The current wave of declarations of Dravid being "India's best ever" is based on his exceptional performances in the last few years, and Tendulkar's (relative) lack of the same in this period. The opinions of the public and the newspaper columns on who's the "best ever" are almost always dependent on the recent past.

Anyway, so much for my opinion. Now, for some facts. Tendulkar was in both Richie Benaud's and Don Bradman's best elevens of all time. Some of the greatest bowlers of this era - Shane Warne, Allan Donald, Muttiah Muralitharan (who also named Brian Lara alongside him) - have named Tendulkar the greatest batsman they've ever bowled to - these are bowlers who have played against both Dravid and Tendulkar. And I have named but a few from amongst the current lot and former players who rate Tendulkar so.

Point is, while a statement like "Dravid is arguably the best Indian batsman of his era" will have its supporters, you will find legions of others (including great cricketers of the past and the present) affirming otherwise. Which is why that quote does not belong in the article. It is not NPOV. 202.80.59.3 07:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

• Agree with you to a large extent, especially 'arguably the best' part. Try if you can improve it . If not, I'll give it a try in a week or so. thanks, Tintin 13:43, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

• • I don't have access to statistics, and besides I'm not an authority on Dravid. It's probably best if I refrained from degrading the article even more.202.80.59.3 13:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

• Dravid averages about 63 away and 50 at home, which indicates that he does well adapting to "non-native" conditions. He has an overall average of 58, with an average in the first innings of about 65 and in the second of 50? For most other players, their second innings average is significantly lower than the first, because the pitch becomes scratched and physically damaged, so that the ball bounces more unpredictable, for example Virender Sehwag, another Indian averages 75 in first innings and 25 in the seond innings. If you check the articles on Pakistani players, for example Shoaib Malik, this gives you an indication that many cricket bios are written by fans Blnguyen 03:05, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

The way you have put it is very good and is the way that is should be in the article. The way it currently is in the article (the first of the quotes above) sounds like a fan's adoring words.

P.S. - That Shoaib Malik article is indeed very bad. But that doesn't mean that this article should plumb the depths of that one. 202.80.59.3 07:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

• As a general comment, please try to avoid putting statistics that are likely to change very often in the main body of the article. At the moment there is something about RSD's career average in Tests and the average since 2000 and to keep the article accurate, these will need to be updated after every Test match. When you add the stats, keep them in some way that they will be fairly stable over time. Tintin 13:32, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Of late, Rahul Dravid seems to have become an Arrogant person - after becoming the captain. Its just time before he goes to the dustbin...

The dude who's mentioned Sachin Tendulkar seems to be biased. Sachin is great but in terms of dependability is nowhere close to Dravid. Sachin and Dravid are two different players. Dravid typically is the backbone of the team aroudn which the innings are built. Today there are seveal players in the team who could replace Tendulkar but I'm not sure any of them could replace Dravid's role in the lineup

Rahul and sachin r both different players! not if u r compare them in cricketing terms! remember Dravid can get 50 runs in 21 balls, he can be really aggressive when he needs to be! It's the matter of preferences Dravid always chose team over himself while it was reverse with sachin! don't forget the guy is involved in 150+ century partnerships in his career, the guy played with Saline on supporting Laxman to give India it's biggest win. after Match-fixing hit India who kept India alive? who stabilized the sinking ship? was it sachin? not at all. rather, sachin played slow when India needed a fast run-rate just to get his 100 at sharjah against Sri lanka! Not mentioning Dravid's records further and insulting his career I'll end this saying 'it's simply the matter of preferences! Sachin chose personal glory but, Dravid chose team, he held the fort when nobody was there, supported laxman, Sachin, Ganguly, kumble and many others! He simply sacrificed many runs he could've got for the good of his team, gave others confidence while staying on the non-strike end! And I think that makes him way better than Sachin! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.244.39 (talk) 11:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

NPOV

This article has been getting a lot worse over recent days, especially the first paragraph under the contents box, and I've put an {{NPOV}} marker on it.

All statements need to be sourced and written from a neutral point of view. Among those which aren't at the moment:

He is an intensely committed,hard working,intelligent cricketer and a complete team man

He has proved that he is one of finest batsmen to have played the game

Most Indian victories have come with Dravid playing a significant role

There are many who feel that he has received the respect that he should have received in the first place

Along with Brian Lara, Sachin Tendulkar, Jaques Kallis and Adam Gilchrist he is among the best batsman playing the game now

Recently he has also won many accolades for his intelligence and inspiring captaincy

All of these are simply fans praising him, with no facts to back up whether the statements are true or false. Anyone want to have a go at rewriting this introduction?

Stephen Turner (Talk) 15:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Blnguyen! Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

"He is tied with Sachin Tendulkar in fourth place for having captained India in the most victorious matches "...Is it a record worth mentioning??221.128.161.89 17:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Dodo

The boy who always stood first??

A book with that title & that too by Chappell? No offense, but live in India & saying that I live off cricket wouldn't be entirely wrong. So I highly doubt that a book of that title exists. There does exist a book called "The Nice guy who Finished First" by Devendra Prabhudesai which is a biography of dravid released in 2005. But a month in Wikipedia has taught me one thing - There are always guys who are smarter & know much more than you. So just to be safe I googled the book title in question. And as expected it turned up nothing except the Wikipedia article, a few other obscure sites & one very offensive MILF article! On the other hand the book I have mentioned has been read by me (google it if you dont trust me). So if I have pulled the rope a lot longer than it is, Please enlighten me! Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 18:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Be bold! If it's wrong, go ahead and remove it. Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:51, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

There is definitely no such book. And why is everyone advertising the book "The Nice guy who finished first"? There are so many books on Dravid. There is a biography on him written by Vedam Jaishankar the sports journalist of the daily, The Indian express. I think the reference to the book "The Nice guy who finished first" being released in Dravid's Timeline ought to be removed.

(ISBN 978-81-2910-729-9). The book actually exists Dushyant Kashyap (Talk) 23:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Criticism

Removing the criticism about VVS Laxman and Anil Kumble dropped from the team, since the Indian captain has no role in team selection. Mssnlayam 05:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Please tell whether the following statement is against NPOVDoctor Bruno 14:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Wrong move as a captain

It is Dravid’s burden that he will forever be asked to account for that Multan declaration. And with this step,[1] his Mr Nice Guy image has taken a beating.

* Dravid is a good player. But he lost an opportunity to become a great player as he is not an aggressive person like Ganguly or Ponting or even like Lara. His captainship during EWorldcup 2007 was miserable so was his performance at crucial matches. The entire team India looked dejected and clearly lacked motivation under his captainship. But he managed and preferred to be be in the good book of BBCI and retained his captainship. But his credibility to junior players as a captain are at the bottom.

Doctor Bruno and POV

I think that Doctor Bruno's edits do not portray a fair picture of Dravid.

• Especially where you have compared Dravid's fourth innings record to Tendulkars record in the second innnings (in thes sense of 3rd and 4th innings). They are not the same thing. Perhaps if you look at the averages, Dravid is about 50 in the fourth innings and Tendulkar is about 35.
• The Multan incident (I know you didn't add this originally but you expanded it?) is about Dravid's attitude to Tendulkar's personal milestone - India won the game by an innings and it set up the series, so it isn't fair as an example of poor captaincy.
• Srikeit has already removed some of the stuff about the Mumbai test, but "And with this step,[2] his Mr Nice Guy image has taken a beating" is original analysis which cannot be deduced from statistics and not from a proper opinion poll - in any case this is not particularly relevant as it is about strategy and not a lack of sportsmanship
• Dravid's finest innings - these appear to have been disretionally selected, and as such is to be avoided if possible

Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 00:58, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I have already told that it an unintentional mistake about the fourth inning in the talk pages.

I did not tell about Multan incident. It was the opinion of a lot of people including Ganguly. I have just quoted it

I have added the finest innings, because it was not there in the page. Also I have just started and it needs to be expanded Doctor Bruno 02:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

• • That's OK I put many messages up simultaneously.I'm not trying to run you down. I mean that it is difficult to have a "select" group of innings, because you would have to justify why some scores which are numerically higher, were actually of lesser skill. He's made 5 200s, but three of them aren't there. I fully realize that some of the small scores were more skillful than the 200s, but it is hard to write this up without coming to POV. Regards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:44, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

It was a fact that Dravid lost much of his mister Nice Guy image when he declared only 6 runs short of Tendulkar's double century, this is judging by opinion columns in newspapers at the time. However, I don't think the point about the third test in Mumbai is valid, it sounds very much like India lost because of Dravid (judging by this article). But I don't think it is our job to count a captain's mistakes in a match and put it against him. I do not see Ricky Ponting's page filled with criticism on how he couldn't defend 434 in an ODI, yet I see criticism of Dravid in a series in which I think he was top scorer and won a match too. Anyway, saying India should've batted first leads to IF and EVENIF which I'm sure isn't part of Wikipedia. Nobleeagle (Talk) 03:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough about the nice guy, but should that be moved to another section- because it is not technically about the effectiveness of his captaincy, rather more so about his rewarding of his players.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:59, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Third test

The statement "Right from making the wrong decision at the toss, to persisting with the mistaken 5-bowler strategy, to leading an ultra-defensive response to England's target, this has been Dravid's nadir as a leader" though cited tilts the NPOV scales. Calling this match the lowest point in his captaincy is a bit harsh & a bit too soon. Only if the tour ends disastrously for India or if this leads to Dravid getting axed at some later point of time can this statement be kept. Otherwise one must wait for the end of the tour before making such statments.

Thanks

Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 00:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

The series has alreasy ended. Please see Geof Boycott's article in Hindu today. He has also said the same thing . I am not against Dravid. When there is a critism para in one player's article, I thought it should be there is every player's page. After all no one is perfectDoctor Bruno 02:07, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Please understand that Dravid has had a very GOOD record. And in a series of GOOD RECORDS, a single loss is a downpoint in his record I did not tell that the match is the worst match by any Indian captain. The remarks was made in context with Dravid. If you have to rank Dravid's captaincy, this match will certainly be last on the list. Please understand that every player will have a nadir as a captain. There is NO captain in test history who does not have a nadir, and an encyclopedia should record both the high points as well as the nadirs.

We need not want Dravid to be axed, to call his one match as a low match. For example, the series where Bradman averaged 50 runs will be a low point in his career even though it may be a fantastic score for others.Doctor Bruno 02:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree that this might be a nadir in Dravid's captaincy record. But he has still got a very young record as captain. As Blnguyen says in the Sachin Tendulkar talk page, we are not a news paper or magazine but an encyclopedia albeit a rapidly updated one. Stats are the only info that can be rapidly updated without worrying about NPOV or any such stuff. But about performances, one must comment about a event that is remembered over a period of time. Reporting is not the job here, fact-finding & presenting it in a neutral way is. That is why I said that the topic must be touched after the tour (including ODIs) ended. Also you keep forgetting that citations are good but NPOV must be maintained.

Thanks

Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 05:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Just for fun. Any Dravid fan will sincerely hope that this should be his nadir. (In other words, he should have only positive features here after)Doctor Bruno 14:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Bring to NPOV

After a long drawn debate about some NPOV violations, I think the article has finally returned to some semblance of normalcy. I think except some subtle NPOV violations, the article mostly is OK. So if someone could help remove them, we can get this tag of this page.

Thanks

Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I have removed a few NPOV violations from the page & I feel that the page is ready to lose the tag. Does anyone think otherwise?

Thanks

Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 07:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Is "Test team of the year" a reference to the ICC World Test XI? If so, the information given there is inaccurate. Sachin Tendulkar was a part of both the World XIs, and missed out only due to injury. Cricket Crazy 10:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

No, the ICC Test team of the year was declared at the ICC Awards while the ICC World XI wre a separate team who played test matches & ODI's against Australia. Sachin was part of the World XI while Dravid was part of the Test team of the Year. (see ICC Awards)

Thanks

Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 15:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Cricket Crazy 16:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Dravid a Maharashtrian

Someone has put Dravid into this category. It appears he was born in Madhya Pradesh, and has been operating out of South India. So how is he a Maharashtrian?ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 06:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

his mother is Maharashtrian born in indore, his father family from south india but living in peswa indore became Maharashtrian but called Dravid as they came from south india, his family still has south indian and Maharashtrian members .

his wife is Maharashtrian, her family in nagpur.

=====================================

Actually Dravid is a Maharashtrian Brahmin surname afaik... Rahul's mothertongue IS Marathi..

File:England flag large.png अमेय आर्यन DaBroodey 17:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Afaik, his family had no surname, like many South Indians. When his ancestors moved to Indore, they had to adopt one as per the local convention. So they chose 'Dravid' as they were from the South.

It is like his ancestors are from Tamil Nadu, the last four generations have lived in Madhya Pradesh, one side of his family is from Maharashtra and they currently live in Karnataka. IMHO, it would be better to live with this ambiguity than insist on classifying him as one or the other. Tintin (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

---

Rahul Dravid always insists that he is Kannadiga (and rightfully so), but his ancestors are Maharashtrain. Rahul Dravid has never come out and admitted that he is Marathi, but during his wedding his mother-revealed this to Rediff: "The Dravids are from Indore/Gwalior, and are Maharashtrian Deshastha Brahmins." http://www.rediff.com/cricket/2003/apr/02vijeta.htm

Rahul Dravid speaks Marathi http://www.royalchallengers.com/fan-club/dravid-speaks-in-english-and-kannada — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.101.164 (talk) 18:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

REwrite

This article is dreadful. I'm trying to completely rewrite it at User:Blnguyen/Rahul Dravid. Pls feel free to have a look and comment at User_talk:Blnguyen. Thanks, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 00:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

An example of Unimportant Record

Recently there has been a discussion regarding important records in cricket and useless records. One example of a useless record is

1. He has the record for least number of innings required to score 1000 runs against West Indies by an Indian (26)

• The only person who has got it in less innings in international cricket is Jacques Kallis (25)

Note that it is just the second least not even the least (and that too against only ONE country). So technically we have 100 players with equal or better records

1. Least number of innings to score 1000 against West Indies
2. Second to Least number of innings to score 1000 against West Indies
3. Least number of innings to score 1000 against Australia
4. Second to Least number of innings to score 1000 against Australia
5. Least number of innings to score 1000 against UAE
6. Second to Least number of innings to score 1000 against UAE

On the other hand, records like highest score in One Innings (Lara), Highest Career Average (Bradman), Highest Number of Centuries, Highest Number of Career Runs etc are important records  Doctor Bruno Talk 18:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

The Wall

His nickname of 'The Wall' in Reebok advertisements was treated by ODI fans as a derisory comment about his inability to rotate strike as he tended to hold up one end playing his front foot defence, neither scoring runs nor getting out.

Is this sentence verifiable? If not, it would be just a POV and might need to be removed. - KNM ^{Talk - Contribs} 03:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I had added {{fact}} tag few days back. No citations provided by any editor yet. Just removed the statement. We can always add it back, if any editor provides the citation supporting this sentence. - KNM ^{Talk - Contribs} 00:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Keeping wickets in Early days

"He later stopped keeping wickets on advice from...."

Was he keeping the wickets before the advice? If yes, that needs to mentioned to make the sentences flow continous, as , there is no mention about "keeping wickets" before that sentence. - KNM ^{Talk - Contribs} 01:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Rephrased the sentences to include the information on keeping wickets, before stopping (in Early days).

"Along with the batting, he was keeping wickets. However, he later stopped keeping wickets on advice from.....". - KNM ^{Talk - Contribs} 03:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Either way its keeping wicket not wickets. --LiamE 09:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Inline refs

Is there some quick and easy way to convert all the trillions of website references in the first few paragraphs to inline refs? Hornplease 00:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Just have to put <ref> and </ref> before and after all the references respectively.

One of the quick ways could be using a find and replace utility of any text editor (like notepad).

Replace "[" with "<ref>" and "]" with "</ref>"

- KNM ^{Talk - Contribs} 00:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Failure to bail out

(Almost consistent) Failure to bail out his team from difficult situations (both regular / big matches and very consistent here as well) unlike Kapil Dev, Steve Waugh, Brian Lara, Inzamam, Abdul Razzak etc should also find a place in criticism section. His batting in crisis at max changes the match scenario from shameful loss to a respectable loss (sometimes a draw in test matches which his fans may strangely quote as great achievements). This should be put in criticism section using neutral language and fans pls don't quote 'once upon a time inning'.
My POV: Dravid along with his spineless team members reminds me of a dialogue from Sholay movie!!! (I am sorry for putting this but couldn't stop myself from conveying it in raw terms what many of Blue Billion feel as well) Vjdchauhan 12:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

• See, another feather (2'nd ODI loss to South Africa on 22-Nov-2006) in long series of failure to bail out. Vjdchauhan 21:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC).

• See, another failure to bail out by the WALL (3'rd ODI against South Africa on 27-Nov-2006) and another inning (50+) to assert what was said above (shameful loss vs respectable loss). Vjdchauhan 06:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC).

Wow, have you been doing this to all of the Indian batsmen? For other editors please see Talk:Sachin Tendulkar and Talk:Indian cricket team. Please read my comments on these pages as well. Gizza^{Chat ©} 10:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Razzaq and Inzy better than Dravid? Well, find a cite, ....I guess you didn't see Calcutta 01, headingley 02, Adelaide 03, Rawalpindi 04, Calcutta 05, WI 4th Test 06? Especially with that average of 65 in away Tests....Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Razzaq vs Dravid in ODI, Razzaq will win hands down. Inzamam vs Dravid in ODI and Tests and as a Captain Dravid doesn't stand anyway nearby. Only one notable Test innings per year from Dravid and there are players who do it regularly (Ponting, Yousuf, Lara have more instances of notable test innings in this calender year itself). Vjdchauhan 12:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC).

I don't mean to offend you but it is the die-hard passionate yet extremely critical cricket fans in India like you that put a lot of strain onto the players. No other team has to face as much pressure from the media and their supporters. And you wonder why they aren't consistent? When a Jaques Kallis or a Michael Clarke get a duck, are their houses set alight by fanatics? Earlier this year, India had set a World Record in ODIs. They had a winning streak of 16 games or so when batting second, which was more that was achieved by West Indies, South Africa or Australia ever.

By the way, Dravid's Test Average is 58.75 (Source:Cricinfo all of these stats), ODI Average & Strike Rate 39.68 & 70 respectively. Razzaq's ODI Stats: Ave 30.6 SR 80. Inzy's Test Ave 50.2, ODI Ave 39.8, ODI SR 74. Stop complaining. You are very close to Trolling IMO. Gizza^{Chat ©} 06:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

BCCI selection committee/Bengal CM too uses 'Best Before Use' data of players like Dravid/Tendulkar/Sehwag etc for comparison. Compare theirs (Dravid/Tendualkar/Sehwag) ODI/Test average data of this/last calendar calendar year with that of Razzak and Inzamam. Vjdchauhan 09:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC).

Okay then... Dravid's ODI average in his last 20 games is 35.5 (See [3])

Razzaq's average in his last 20 ODI games is 36.5 ([4])

One run is barely anything.

Now for the suprise, Inzy's Test average in his last 10 games is 34.78 [5] and Dravid's is 74.71 [6]

Sorry, but the statistics speak for themselves. Gizza^{Chat ©} 10:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

(in Hindi / Hindi mein) Yehi to mein keh raha thaa kee Indian cricket team members dil se majboot nahin hain, humari team tabhi theek perform karti hai jab opening theek hoo (dil kee majbooti kee jyaada jaroorat tab hooti hai jab aap out of form hain yaa match difficult situation mein naa kee opening mein) yaa phir firstly seamers and then spinners bhee chal jaayein.
Maine sirf Kapil Dev ko hee most consistently tight situation mein India ko jitwaate dekha hai baaki log sirf saal mein 1-2 baar hee difficult situation mein perform kar paate hain aur Rahul Dravid kabhi jitwa nahin paata hai aur wooh game ko sirf sharmanaak haar se respectable loss mein convert kar deta hai.
Tumne kabhi Sachin Tendulkar ko observe kiya hai against teams like Bangladesh/Kenya/Zimbabwe, wooh unpe (abhi bhee) haavi hoo jaata hai kyonkee wooh thodi kamjor teams hain per waisa arrogance against main teams saalon (I think it was in 2001) pehle Sharjah mein Australia ke against dikha thaa uske baad sirf weak teams pe hee josh dikha paata hai.
BCCI (unlike even PCB, SLCB) gritty players kee jagah unko select karti hai jo excel sheet pe behtar nazar aate hain. Vjdchauhan 13:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC).

Well I glad that you are at least not writing any of this unsourced rubbish on the actual articles. I'll now leave you to continue your rants on the talk pages if you want to. Also, you shouldn't be writing in Hinglish here. This is the English encyclopedia and only English is accepted. Have a good day. Gizza^{Chat ©} 01:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

The title of this section still holds true. Vjdchauhan 15:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

Very Outdated

Personal Records -> Test section mentions, "Dravid is one among the only three batsmen to hit Test centuries in four consecutive innings. The other two are Jack Fingleton and Alan Melville. Dravid achieved this by hitting scores of 115, 148, 217 and 100* in three successive matches against England and one against the West Indies. Only Everton Weekes, with centuries in five consecutive innings, has achieved a longer sequence of consecutive Test hundreds."

Recall year Yousuf's and Ponting's 2006 form with >7 centuries in a calendar year. It was in the same no. of tests.

Controversy/Criticism

I was wondering about the uniformity of the sections between Sachin Tendulkar's page and here. While the Multan incident was listed as controversy in Sachin's page, it has been listed as criticism here. Also, there is no reference to the ball tampering charges in VB Series Australia 2004

Is it that we dont want objectivity and are willing to consider only limited facts when collating the article

Kalyan 19:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, the Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid and Sourav Ganguly articles are all in a deplorable state. I was wokring on an upgrade of this article at User:Blnguyen/Rahul Dravid and do have the lolly incident on my mind. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

He is quite weak in the balls that are bowled in the off stump and there is always a gap between his bat and pad. THis weakness has been used by many bowlers to bowled him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.36.114 (talk) 12:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Season in Scotland

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/other_international/6426059.stm

Dravid played in Scotland? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.75.128.200 (talk) 15:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC).

Cleanup needed badly

This article needs some serious cleanup. I is near unreadable because of the sheer number of details in it. Anyone trying to read it will give up very quickly.

Unfortunately I do not know enough about the subject (which I came here to find out more, saw no photo and added on) to contribute.

What is really needed here is reduction of sheer detail, moving statistics out (maybe to a sub page or a separate article), condensing long drawn and rather rambling narrative down to a few readable paragraphs.

I'd be happy to help with reviewing and suggesting, but as I said I am not knowledgable enough about the subject to determine what should be kep and what should be removed.

Achitnis 12:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Considering Dravid is one of crickets icons and can be considered one of the big three in Indian team this page needs some serious work. There is little info in his domestic career. This article needs a section on:

• Domestic career: Minimum info would be his current club, who he played for in the past. This section should ideally lead to international career by explaining how he got in the Indian team. Did he have an outstanding season or was he consistently good for a number of seasons?

• International career: I feel needs expansion with separate parts for Test and ODI careers followed possibly by a part on his captaincy?

In general Dravid's page should be:

• Lead: Should mention clubs and country he plays for (including previous clubs in the past).
• Personal life/youth: Family, schools he went and played cricket with;
• Domestic career
• International career: Starting with a subsection on ODI as he made his first appearance for India in this. This would then be followed by the Test section which could lead to another sub section of captaincy.
• Achievements:

Does anyone agree with this, or am I just talking rubbish? Monsta666 20:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Language Bigots - no vandalising, please

I notice that the Language Bigots are trying to make this yet another battle ground.

Please note that I have no compunctions about recommending a ban on anyone who tries to boost one language at the cost of another (and I have been fairly successful at that).

Whether you like it or not, Dravid lives in Bangalore, and is a resident of Karnataka, and his entire career was built there, even if he has a family background that is Marathi. No one is denying his family background, but let's not try and bury his life entirely, ok?

If you have a problem with that, may I point you at the Rajinikanth article? it is entirely possible for someone to be from one region of India, and be very much part of another.

If you *still* have a problem with this, I highly encourage you to read this article before you make another language-bigot edit.

Achitnis 12:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Exactly. Some user is not allowing Marathi script in Pandit Bhimsen Joshi and Kumar Gandharva's article. They belong to Maharashtra as much as karnataka.

I agree - both those articles should allow both languages references. Gnanapiti, give it a rest please - you aren't helping with the edit/language wars. Stateofart, the Dravid article will mention both languages as it is shown now. If someone knocks off anything again, I will rewrite the article to show that Dravid has neither Marathi nor Kannada roots, since he is was born in Indore. :) Achitnis 14:47, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Captaincy

Shouldn't the first line say "former/ex- captain"? He has resigned, it's not gossip, it's formal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.22.161 (talk) 10:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Dravid's "poor" 2007 World Cup

Surely this needs to be changed. While India obvouosly had a shocker, Dravid averaged 40.5 for the tournament and scored one fifty in three innings - his batting average and innings:50 ratio actually superior during the '07 World Cup than his overall career records. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.6.121 (talk) 03:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Tagging article for re-write

This article has now become one the messiest pieces of writing I have seen on WP.

It has been allowed to become a collection of sometimes meaningless statistics, opinions and one-liners. Somewhere along the way, people lost track of the fact that this is an encyclopedia article about a person, and have turned this article into a repository of numbers and an constantly updated news stream.

It is impossible to read this article, and understand who Rahul Dravid is as a person. The sheer weight of statistics and meaningless trivia completely destroys this article. Anyone who comes here to read about the person is going to scoot really quickly.

If so desired, we should split this article into one about Rahul Dravid, and one about his player statistics.

Unless I see serious and valid objections, I am going to trim this article down to readability. That will mean removing almost all the stats.

Note that I am not a cricket fan, and it will be hard for me to choose selected statistics, so I am going to focus on the person, not his playing stats. I am going to need help with this, so I will clone the existing article to preserve it as a reminder of how bad things got :) and to allow us to retrieve stuff that others may find important.

I am NOT going to follow suggestions of "work on a copy" because that will lead to nothing. Never gonna happen. The sooner the article is trimmed down dramatically, the sooner it can be improved.

Achitnis 17:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

If your main complaint is because of the statistics, then your complaints are misdirected. Lots of prominent athletes have career AND season statistics on their page, like David Ortiz. In cricket, these stats are vital to rating a player since there are so many more factors. I do agree that there is unnecessary info in here, like a timeline.216.254.116.23 (talk) 17:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup and copyedit

Yesterday, I made some changes. Mainly rephrasing sentences and adding references. I also removed some information like endorsements, which has be undone by User:Blnguyen. I don't want to redo my change unless editors of this page express their views on whether endorsements need to be listed or not. Thanks.GDibyendu (talk) 04:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I also made these changes in Personal Life section, User:Blnguyen has undone these changes. I don't want to redo these changes unless editors of this page agrees or disagrees on my changes (I am adding explanations for these changes below): Rahul was born in Indore, Madhya Pradesh (Reference 1) into a Maharashtrian Deshastha Brahmin family (Reference 2) living in Karnataka. He grew up in Bangalore, Karnataka. (Reference 3)

>>I removed Karnataka here as last sentence already mentioned that.

He speaks Kannada and Marathi. (Reference 4)(Reference 5)

>>It seems he speaks only those two languages! Thats why I changed it to: "He is fluent in both Kannada and Marathi."

He has a brother named Vijay. Dravid's father worked for Kissan, a company known for jams and preserves and thus he earned the nickname Jammy from his teammates at St. Joseph's, Bangalore. (Reference 6)

>>I changed perserves to perservatives. and rephrased the sentence.

Rahul Dravid has a degree in commerce from St Joseph's College of Commerce Bangalore, Karnataka. On May 4, 2003, Rahul married Dr. Vijeta Pendharkar, a surgeon from Nagpur (Reference 7)

>>Who needs a reference for his marriage? This may be the only wikipage which gives reference for a marriage. And why do we need to specify exact date of marriage?

and on October 11, 2005, their son, Samit, was born. (Reference 8)

>>Who needs to know when exactly their son was born and who needs a reference for this? GDibyendu (talk) 04:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Dravid in Scotland?

In the article, under English County, it says that Dravid has played for Scotland. Now, how is this possible? Is this true? Can I edit it if it is incorrect? Up and over for a six! (talk) 03:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

It is possible, and did happen - he played as an overseas player for Scotland in English domestic competition - have a look here: http://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Players/2/2280/a_Batting_by_Team.html JP (talk) 08:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Dravid's pic

Yellowmonkey, what exactly is the problem with putting in a pic of the man in his freakin' Country's blue ODI attire? That pic was awesome the one you just reverted. Who are you and why did you do that?

test runs

"He is the third Indian batsmen and fifth in the world to reach 11,000 test runs."

Done. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 08:53, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

STATISTICS

Domestic team information Years Team 1990 – present Karnataka 2003 Scotland 2000 Kent 2008-present Royal Challengers Bangalore 2009 Canterbury, New Zealand Career statistics Competition Test ODI FC LA Matches 135 339 263 442 Runs scored 11,038 10,765 20,950 15,041 Batting average 53.06 39.43 55.57 42.48 100s/50s 27/57 12/82 56/111 21/110 Top score 270 153 270 153 Although with a low batting average of 41.02 in 2008 he is still over 52 in 2009. Balls bowled 120 186 617 477 Wickets 1 4 5 4 Bowling average 39.00 42.50 54.60 105.25 5 wickets in innings 0 0 0 0 10 wickets in match 0 n/a 0 n/a Best bowling 1/18 2/43 2/16 2/43 Catches/stumpings 184/0 196/14 322/1 230/17 Source: CricketArchive, 14 November 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkainc (talk • contribs) 11:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Captaincy - Achievements

"Rahul Dravid is the only other Indian to be the top scorer (first one is Sachin Tendulkar - twice - 1996, 2003) in a World Cup. He amassed 461 runs in the 1999 World Cup, the first World Cup he played." Can somebody please explain me how that is considered an achievement in 'captaincy'? He was the captain in neither of the worldcups('99 & '03). Pls move the record to its proper place. --praveen chandrahas —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.149.48.67 (talk) 13:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Pending changes

This article is one of a number (about 100) selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.

The following request appears on that page:

Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Penfding changes" would be appreciated.

Please update the Queue page as appropriate.

Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially

Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 23:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC).

Pronunciation in Marathi

According to the present trend, the pronunciation should only be done in native language. Hence removed the marathi pron. Boolyme ^Chat!! 22:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

POV

The following line in the article is un-encyclopedic and possibly biased.

Despite these criticisms, Rahul Dravid has been widely considered as the most popular cricketer in the world after Sachin Tendulkar and Don Bradman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.71.58.35 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Can someone update the Box under Dravid's image?

Dravid recently played his 151st test for India Vs West Indies and what a performance it was!

I have updated the column under the MoM awards and added his latest accolade, however, I am unable to change the stats at the begining of the article. Can someone update it?

Thanks Hariya1234 (talk) 20:48, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

* Can someone tell me what is that box called? Thanks Hariya1234 (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Dravid name in TAMIL????

Please delete the name in Tamil , how this is linked with TAMIL?? Is Rajanikant name in Kannada

Anil.tmkr (talk) 03:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

 Not done I don't know who added his name in Tamil. But that makes sense, since his ancestors were from Tamil Nadu. Rajini's roots are from Maharashtra and not Karnataka. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 03:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Retirement

Rahul Dravid has taken retirement dicisition from International ODI & T20 on August 6 2011. updated that info Nitish.game (talk) 19:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Anoopjumban, 23 August 2011

Please change "Dravid has scored 31 centuries in Test cricket at an average of 53.31" to "Dravid has scored 35 centuries in Test cricket at an average of 53.00"

Anoopjumban (talk) 13:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Topher385 (talk) 20:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done But next time, even if the ref is included in the article please list it with your request so that whoever responds can see it. —SpacemanSpiff 20:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Nraxit, 17 September 2011

column2 = ODI | matches2 = 344 | runs2 = 10,889 | bat avg2 = 39.16 | 100s/50s2 = 12/83 | top score2 = 153 | deliveries2 = 186 | wickets2 = 4 | bowl avg2 = 42.50 | fivefor2 = 0 | tenfor2 = 0 | best bowling2 = 2/43 | catches/stumpings2 = 196/14 Nraxit (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Thanks. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 07:27, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from , 21 October 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} I would like to add on to Retirement From ODI & T20I section.

Retirement From ODI & T20I

Rahul Dravid Played his last ODI innings against England at Sophia Gardens,Cardiff on Friday,16 Semptember 2011.He scored 69 runs from 79 balls before eventually being bowled by Graeme Swann. Much respected that he was, the England players shook his hand and he walked out to a standing ovation from the spectators with one of the spectator banners reading “The one reason we are here is to show our gratitude to Rahul”.

Refer article: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-09-16/top-stories/30164584_1_rahul-dravid-odi-retirement-run-getter Dravid gets standing ovation from crowd on his swansong ODI

Gvk013 (talk) 14:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

I have added the first portion of your request, with the reference. I cannot add the second part, because it is not verifiable or neutral.  Chzz  ►  08:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for that. As far as the first part goes, it already exists. If you would like to verify the second part then please watch the following video (jump to 9 minutes). http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xl4pf6_part-1_creation . Thanks once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gvk013 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from , 14 November 2011

As this article is about Rahul Dravid, under the retirement from ODI, there is no need to put information on how and who took his wicket. That information is redundant and is not graceful.

203.206.220.142 (talk) 05:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Not done: His last ODI innings is relevant and it is therefore relevant to say how he was dismissed. The information is neither redundant (it's not mentioned) and is done in a neutral tone. It's also worth noting that one of our best cricket biographies, Don Bradman, mentions his last international innings and how he was dismissed. Jenks24 (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Wrong fact about record?

Under the Facts section, it says Dravid was the first No.3 batsman to score 10000 - what is the source for this? Pretty sure it would be Brian Lara.

Mayankeagle (talk) 06:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Brian Lara played most of his carrier as a no. 4. He has scored more then 7500 runs at no. 4 and 3749 runs at no. 3. On the other end Dravid played most of his carrier as a no.3 and scored more then 10000 runs at this position. I have provided the link below.

http://www.cricketweb.net/statsspider/player/graph/738085-Test-12.php --Vyom25 (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 21 December 2011

Under Facts; The 1st line "Rahul Dravid is the first batsmen who has registered a score of century in all test playing nations.", does not clearly mention in which format of the game its done. Actually its in Tests. Moreover, until now Dravid is the only person to achieve this feat. So most appropriate line would be as below: In Tests, Rahul Dravid is the first and only batsmen who has registered a score of century in all test playing nations.

Sujeshkumarwiki (talk) 12:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

• -  On hold - I had a look round and couldn't find this in a reliable source WP:RS - this http://cricket.yahoo.com/player-profile/rahul-dravid_1004 - doesn't specify in what type of match it was http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/player/28114.html - I couldn't find your desired addition here either. If you present a source for your edit I will add it for you - regards - Youreallycan (talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

here have a look at this list http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/28114.html?class=1;template=results;type=batting;view=innings it seems he has scored at least a century in West Indies, Australia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, England and of course India so no one is left. This source is reliable.--Vyom25 (talk) 07:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Mentioning Caste

Dear Editors!
There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals. Your views if any are welcome there or even here.
And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc.
Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Not here, please. There is a community discussion taking place at WT:INB and I would advise people to read the entire discussion before forming an opinion because the above summary is incorrect. Nothing more need be said here. - Sitush (talk) 02:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 13 March 2012

Rahul Dravid's wife's name is spelled as "Vijeeta" and not "Vijeta" as mentioned. Please correct this minor error.

14.99.93.36 (talk) 07:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 15:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Dear Editor, Rahul Dravid is actively involved with Bangalore Hospice Trust (www.karunashraya.org). He is the Ambassador and I have seen him attend the board meeting. Karunashraya is situated in Bangalore and it is the best is providing free palliative care for terminally ill cancer patients. He has a heart for those who are dying by this dreaded disease. Appreciate of you can include this in the main article along with the two already mentioned/ Karunashraya is supported by Lion's Rotary Club, Bangalore club and was initially funded by Govt of Karnataka. The current facility was inaugurated by then Governor Khurshid Alam Khan and a lot of High tech companies along with individuals provide financial, kin and voluntary support Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.174.240 (talk) 12:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 May 2012

in the retirement section

'he dint expect to be recalled'

should be didn't, its on the second line of this section

92.234.170.48 (talk) 17:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 17:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 July 2012

He is only the second player, after Sachin Tendulkar, to reach 13,000 runs in Test cricket.[5]

Please change to

He became the second player, after Sachin Tendulkar, to reach 13,000 runs in Test cricket.[5]

You can an additional footnote for citation http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;template=results;type=batting 59.61.87.190 (talk) 08:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

This appears to be a duplicate of the below request. RudolfRed (talk) 16:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 July 2012

"He is only the second player, after Sachin Tendulkar, to reach 13,000 runs in Test cricket.[5]"

Please change to

He became the second player, after Sachin Tendulkar, to reach 13,000 runs in Test cricket.[5]

You can an additional footnote for citation http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;template=results;type=batting

"He is the first and only batsman to score a century in all ten Test playing nations.[7]"

Please change to "He became the first batsman to score a century against the other nine current Test playing nations.[7]"

59.61.87.190 (talk) 08:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Done, thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 11:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

The request about being the 2nd batsman to reach 13,000 mark was fine but the 2nd request is a bit problematic. As the original record and the change suggested are two totally different things. Scorin a hundred in all 10 test playing nations and scoring a hundred against the other 9 test playing nations are two different things. You can score a hundred against other 9 nations without scoring a hundred in all 10 test playing nations. For example, Sachin too has score a hundred against other 9 nations, but he has never scored a hundred in Zimbabwe. Dravid is indeed the only batsman to have scored a hundred in all 10 nations. Kindly note that and make necessary changes. Skagrawal4k (talk) 19:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I didn't see the second part, I was responding to the above edit request and seem to have accidentally marked this one as done instead. —SpacemanSpiff 08:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Fine then. If you didn't make the 2nd change, then No harm done. As the 2nd part of the request was not a valid request. Skagrawal4k (talk) 09:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Removing the table "Dravid's results in international matches"

Such stats are insignificant and have no place in wiki. Statistics are endless. There is no point adding unnecessary numbers to the point of rendering the article pointless. Wins and losses as a captain is a significant record but even then it can be accommodated in the prose instead of tabular form. Wins and losses as a player is not a significant stat. I've not seen any Cricketer's wiki who has such a table in his article. If we go on to add such useless statistics, then the article would become nothing more than a sea of numbers. Hell, I can add a table with Dravid's wins as a keeper. I can add a table of his batting statistics as a keeper batsman and as a non-keeper batsman. I can add a table of his batting records at different batting positions. Do we want that? Then what's the point of having cricinfo statsguru. This is a wiki article. We are not here to convert it into a cricinfo player's profile. Skagrawal4k (talk) 08:05, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Agreed with User:Skagrawal. WP:NOTSTATSBOOK comes into it. The bare minimum pure stats wise a player should have on an article is an infobox with basic career stats. Players of note, perhaps will have their performances against other nations in major matches, or perhaps a list of their centuries, but more often than not that will form a seperate article, eg: List of international cricket centuries by Kevin Pietersen. On captaincy, something mentioned in the prose is sufficient - like in Michael Vaughan's. Too many stats can screw with readability. As Skagrawal, some of the more wonderful and sometimes weird cricket stats are what cricinfo's statsguru and CricketArchive are for. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 22:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 September 2012

Spelling mistake: Dravid typed as Dracid Yogesh Chaudhari 19:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yachaudhari (talk • contribs)

 Done Dl2000 (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 13 September 2012

Early life Rahul dravid also has a degree in engineering. Samyak jain1995 (talk) 08:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

 Not done This may be true but provide a reliable source please. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done

Found during October 2012 copy edit

• The article said: "Dravid's father worked for a jams producing and preserving company Kissan, due to which he earned the nickname Jammy from his teammates at St. Joseph's Boys' High School." The source is this, and it doesn't bear out that claim. It doesn't mention Kissan, which anyway is a redirect to a Bollywood film. According to the Jams article, jams is a particular clothing line. And the source says that he got that nickname in the Indian team, not at school. Adjusted accordingly. --Stfg (talk) 14:38, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

I've just noticed that the editor who linked jams wrote it as [[jams]] instead of [[jam]]s. Note the difference: the first links to jams, the clothing line, and the second links to jam, a redirect to Fruit preserves! Guys, don't just insert random wikilinks -- check what they link to! --Stfg (talk) 15:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Seriously, what a shame. A legendary cricketer like Dravid deserves a much better wiki page. I hope and intend to improve this page once I'm done with my entrance exams. Skagrawal4k (talk) 05:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, he does. Looking forward to seeing what you can do. --Stfg (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Drastic improvement needed

I notice that this page has had a copy-edit and improved a little, but there are still quite a few prose issues which need ironing out. Also, the coverage of his career remains very sparse. If anyone is serious about improving this article to at least GA standard, I think we need to get the ball rolling a bit.

From a quick glance, the Personal life section (which may be better named "Early life") looks fairly good, but the playing career section is poor. This needs drastic expansion. Then I would suggest that "Playing style" needs tightening up, making more relevant, and shortening. Perhaps the Controversies section needs condensing as well: NPOV does not mean list every piece of criticism of a player, and Dravid was far from a controversial cricketer.

In terms of his playing career, some more sources are needed. The obvious place to look is Wisden Cricketers' Almanack, which is easy enough to do, and I would be more than willing to help in providing references from this. It would more than adequately cover his entire career in depth, but is perhaps a little Anglo-centric at times. What other sources are available? Newspapers are usually OK, but can be variable in quality unless by a respected journalist. Cricinfo has quite a lot of good stuff. I see that there was a biography in 2004, but I know nothing of the author, nor how good the book is, but it may be a good source. Are there any other books which include him? Anything along the lines of "A history of Indian cricket" would be good, although I notice such a work by Bose was published in 2002 so would not cover Dravid's whole career (but it might be a good start). Sarastro1 (talk) 10:08, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Hope I'm on the right track

I'm done with Dravid's pre- 1999 World Cup test performances. Now will proceed to his pre World Cup ODI career. The great man's article has laid in tatters for just too long. Desperately want it to reach a minimum of B status. Though FA is the ultimate aim. Hope I'm on the right path. Working through my cell phone, so can't add citations. Will do it when I access through my laptop. Skagrawal4k (talk) 12:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Done with the pre-world cup ODI career as well. Will spend some time now on refining what I've already added, spell checking etc., adding wiki links, before starting to work on the 1999 World Cup section. Skagrawal4k (talk) 21:14, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

1999 World Cup is done. Now moving ahead. One series at a time. Just like Dravid said on 2011 England tour. The page is looking much better. We'll get there.Skagrawal4k (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

"Former" cricketer ?

He's playing in the 2013 IPL. He's a former Test and ODI cricketer. I don't know how to make the prose flow but I think "former Indian cricketer" is wrong.

I think deleting "former" would be better than the current version. Peteroakley (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

a small error.

In the first innings of the second Test against Australia at Adelaide, India reached 85–4 in reply to Australia's 556, when Dravid and Laxsman made 303 for the fifth wicket. please change the spelling of "Laxsman" to "Laxman" as it is the correct one. everywhere else the spelling is correct, that is "Laxman"

Done. Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2014

Please also mention that Rahul Dravid is Popularly known as Gentleman. It is because he is the true gentleman Indian cricket has ever witnessed. This gentleman never lost his temper on field against anybody. Also mention about this versatile player. He always played as per need of the team, I mean he played as opener, 1 down, 2 down, 5th, 6th till 7th position and no other batsman might have played at these many positions successfully. He even played the role of vice-captain, captain even as wicket keeper in Indian team as per needs of team. 114.143.73.125 (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Not done: You have made no edit request in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", so it is unclear what you want added.
Furthermore, you have not cited any reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 15:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2014

122.179.96.244 (talk) 14:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC) RAHUL DRAVID IS A KANNADIGA

Not done: What? NiciVampireHeart 15:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2015

Personal information Full name Rahul Sharad Dravid Born 11 January 1973 (age 42) Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India Nickname The Wall, Jammy, Mr. Dependable Height 5 ft 11 in (1.80 m) Batting style Right-handed Bowling style Right arm off spin Role Batsman, occasional wicketkeeper Website http://www.rahuldravid.com/ Abhishekb936 (talk) 06:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  10:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Website mention in personal info

Please add website of Rahul Dravid in his personal info. Abhishekb936 (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done - I have added the website under External Links
It cannot be added to the Infobox on the right-hand-side, as it is not a supported parameter of Template:Infobox cricketer - Arjayay (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2015

Arjayay Thanks for adding website. But if you see wiki page of other sports personality Roger Federer, website given in right side where it is visible. I understand your point of infobox template. Still I request you to consider once again mentioning website. If it is not possible, no problem. Abhishekb936 (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Not done for now: Looks like you need to go to Template:Infobox cricketer/sandbox and add the ability for Template:Infobox cricketer to support website. Once you've done that and added a testcase to Template:Infobox cricketer/testcases, you can go to Template talk:Infobox cricketer and add the parameter be added if you are unable to edit the template yourself. Once it has been added to the template, feel free to come back here and request it added in this use case. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 17:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict)  Done but it doesn't make any difference.
I understand that, although you can't edit it, you can see the code currently in use, so you can see that I have added it to the infobox, but it doesn't show in the article.
Although "Website =" appears in Template:Infobox cricketer it does not work - I have tried "website =" as at Template:Infobox tennis biography but that doesn't work in the cricket infobox.
So "website" is a supported parameter for tennis players, but not cricketers - I will ask why at Template talk:Infobox cricketer. - Arjayay (talk) 17:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done I added the parameter code to the infobox template; then fixed it in this article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rahul Dravid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070329000846/http://in.rediff.com:80/cricket/2005/oct/11dravid.htm to http://in.rediff.com/cricket/2005/oct/11dravid.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rahul Dravid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131224110059/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110822/jsp/.../story_14407797.jsp to http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110822/jsp/.../story_14407797.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Rahul Dravid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6U68ulwpb?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmha.nic.in%2Fsites%2Fupload_files%2Fmha%2Ffiles%2FLST-PDAWD-2013.pdf to http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://archives.deccanchronicle.com/130110/sports-cricket/gallery/happy-bday-rahul-dravid
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/player/28114.html?index=timeline
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cricketcountry.com/news/lord-s-feels-like-home-says-dravid-4118
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/28114.html?class=1;template=results;type=batting;view=innings
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.khelnama.com/130620/cricket/features/golden-debuts-day-sourav-ganguly-rahul-dravid-lords/10043
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/28114.html?class=1;template=results;type=fielding;view=innings
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63714.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.espncricinfo.com/wisdenalmanack/content/story/153535.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.espncricinfo.com/england-v-india-2011/content/story/523876.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://sports.ndtv.com/ind-eng-2011/features/specials/178469-retirement
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/532534.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283043.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/28114.html?class=1;filter=advanced;orderby=start;season=1996;season=1996%2F97;season=1997;season=1997%2F98;template=results;type=batting;view=innings
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140707031308/http://www.lords.org:80/fixtures/fixtures-and-tickets/mcc-v-rest-of-the-world-5-july/? to http://www.lords.org/fixtures/fixtures-and-tickets/mcc-v-rest-of-the-world-5-july/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2017

Can you please add the details about his hometown in the personal information?

The fact that he was brought up in Bangalore, Karnataka and that he lives in Bangalore now is not conveyed just with the 'Born' section. Sidharth N. Kashyap 21:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidharth.n.kashyap (talk • contribs)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 13:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Rahul Dravid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716094607/http://www.verveonline.com/29/people/rahul/full.shtml to http://www.verveonline.com/29/people/rahul/full.shtml
• Added archive https://archive.is/20131022093253/http://www.triposo.com/section/Rahul_Dravid to http://www.triposo.com/section/Rahul_Dravid
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023061911/http://www.4to40.com/legends/print.asp?p=Rahul_Sharad_Dravid&k=Ranji_Trophy to http://www.4to40.com/legends/print.asp?p=Rahul_Sharad_Dravid&k=Ranji_Trophy
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/28114.html?class=1;template=results;type=batting;view=innings
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/28114.html?class=1;template=results;type=fielding;view=innings
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Dravid-says-no-more-ODIs-after-England-series/828232/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716094607/http://www.verveonline.com/29/people/rahul/full.shtml to http://www.verveonline.com/29/people/rahul/full.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2018

Rahul dravid residence - Bengaluru and Rahul dravid played for Karnataka team and he made Karnataka proud so many times so please provide his name in Kannada [ರಾಹುಲ್ ದ್ರಾವಿಡ್] and some others state peoples wants to hide his Kannada and Karnataka identity. kindly do changes.(Diazbrothers talk) 04:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 February 2018

~~rahul dravid is also ratna dravid sister.i know this for sure because ratna dravid is

related to me~~

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)