Talk:Radiant Silvergun/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheJoebro64 (talk · contribs) 20:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

I'll finish this by the end of the week. JOEBRO64 20:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Review

@TarkusAB: Overall, this article is fantastic. I just have a few points:

• I'd link to porting when it is first mentioned in the lead. Same thing goes for development.
• The story of Radiant Silvergun is told non-linearly through animated videos and scripted dialogue between stages—I think you might need a reference for this, as it's sort of an original claim.
• The title "Radiant Silvergun" is in reference to an early concept for the game → The title "Radiant Silvergun" is in reference to an early concept for the game
• None of the publications (CVG, GameSpot, etc.) in the reception section have links to their respective pages.
• The hyphen in "rerelease" is unneeded. Standard style is to omit the hyphen in "re-" words unless it causes an ambiguous meaning (example: "recover" vs. "re-cover").

That's all I found. I think your articles get better every time, Tarkus. Nice work. JOEBRO64 23:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

@TheJoebro64: Thanks for reviewing. I am pretty busy this week irl, but will get to Shade and this when I have some time. May not be until weekend. TarkusAB^talk 13:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

No rush. Take your time. JOEBRO64 19:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

@TheJoebro64: Done TarkusAB^talk 13:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Great! Let's get this promoted. JOEBRO64 14:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)