Talk:Pulborough

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stopham Bridge

Stopham bridge is on the River Arun not the Rother. Unless anybody knows of a Saxon bridge on the Rother at Stopham I will change this. (Charles 19:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Banner Shell

I propose we change the project banner container to WikiProjectBannerShell which I think is a better version. SeeTalk:Buxted for an example. MortimerCat (talk) 06:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed--Charles (talk) 07:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Codmore Hill, Marehill, North Heath & Nutbourne, Horsham to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 06:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old Census Data

Does anyone have a valid reason for ignoring the more recent census data? Failing to account for the huge amount of local development since the previous census allows County & District councils to divert necessary resources away from our local services. (NickLocal) 17:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.249.31 (talk) [reply]

It is a huge amount of work to update every settlement to the new census, if the new figures are available, and nobody has got round to it yet. Perhaps you would like to help? I would hope that councils would get their data direct from the census rather than from here.--Charles (talk) 17:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pulborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]