Talk:Puck (magazine)
Appearance
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contradictions
[edit]Compounding the utter lack of text cites is that the text contradicts itself. While one paragraph claims that "32-page issues" were "typical", the next claims that an issue "consisted of sixteen pages". This article has a long way to go, and Step No. 1 would be getting the facts straight, or at least consistent. No. 2 would be actual fact cites. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Punch
[edit]Was it an imitation of the famed magazine Punch?Nitpyck (talk) 07:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
POV
[edit]The "Politics and Religion" section in not sourced and the wording reeks of anti-Catholic bias. I nominate it be verified, edited or removed.Thank you LoneWolf1992 (talk) 1:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Start-Class magazine articles
- High-importance magazine articles
- WikiProject Magazines articles
- Start-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles