Talk:Prix de Rome

Awards Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fragonard

There is a discrepancy regarding the year Fragonard won the Prix de Rome. Wiki's Fragonard page says he won it in 1752, however, Wiki's Prix de Rome page, in the painting category listing, says he won it in 1758. Which one is correct?

1752 is correct. I will make the correction to this article. Askari Mark | Talk 03:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ravel

"Ravel tried a total of five times to win the prize, and the last failed attempt in 1905 was so controversial that it led to a complete reorganization of the administration at the Paris Conservatory". So, why Ravel's name is figured on the laureates list of 1901?? Gerea-en 00:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

30-April-2007: Sources say "André Caplet" won 1901 Prix de Rome in music, so I will put "(against Maurice Ravel, 3rd prize)" to adjust; Ravel won 3rd prize, but that was not stated on the short list. Thanks for the note. -Wikid77 06:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gérard Grisey

In 1972 Gérard Grisey seems to have won the Prix de Rome, yet this price was abolished in 1968. Can Grisey still have won this prize? Brbbl (talk) 09:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curious about the number of listed winners

Does anyone know if there's a reason why architecture lists Deuxième/Troisieme awards while painting only lists the first prize winner? (Other than the massive effort involved in compiling all of that extra information, of course). VernoWhitney (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Annual subject

The French page lists the subject for the students (for instance, 1788 subject was "the Death of Tatius"), the same should be done with the lists for the English page. Along side each winner. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 09:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prix de Rome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120208163031/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Henri_Regnault to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Henri_Regnault

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]