Jump to content

Talk:Power Rangers RPM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Zords

[edit]

Currently, there are three megazords divided into nine zords. In the fall, there will be another three piece megazord that will combine with the others three megazords to make a twelve piece megazord. This might break the record of most pieced "gattai" since the Drivemax Ultrazord (Ultimate Daibouken) from PROO has a ten piece zord. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.158.29 (talk) 16:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation until it appears in Sentai and its still speculation until its actually shown in power rangers (they may not incorperate it after all) 81.132.46.53 (talk) 23:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title per Trademarks?

[edit]

IMO the trademark citations are pretty good evidence of a tentative title. That is, however, IMO OR. Isn't the proper approach to say something along the lines of

Power Rangers: RPM is a planned series of the long-running ...
No title has been announced, but industry speculation has adopted the RPM suffix as a presumed working title in response to trademark registrations by ....

with appropriate refs to verify that the industry buzz exists? We should be reporting what others have concluded is likely, not expressing our opinion of what is likely, as the citation of the trademark filings implies we have done.
--Jerzy•t 15:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, around this time last year, the US Trademark Office had the Jungle Fury trademarks up, and the trademarks clearly state what they are for. But this rewording could be good.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We don't exclude OR for being false, but for failing to represent established knowledge. Wherever you learned about the trademarks is probably the ref we want.
--Jerzy•t 23:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would think the official toy line is enough to prove the title. Then again, I'm new at this sort of thing. http://www.toywiz.com/rpmbasic.html AkuTenshiiZero (talk) 17:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is nearly six months old now, but thank you for your input.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

[edit]

I personally object to any deletion of this page, as it makes little sense; it certainly doesn't fit the requirements for a speedy deletion, at any rate. Reasons given for the deletion nomination include being "blatantly speculative; violates WP:OR, WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL", but these are spurious. This is 2009's season for a popular media franchise, and the article has seven citations all noting trademarks for the show have been filed and that filming begins this month. Speculation/original research doesn't exist in this article; it's all about something that is established as existing and does not lie or add speculatory information about its nature (except maybe the line about Go-onger images showing up at the Toy Fair, which did happen, but needs a suitable citation). Verifiability is taken care of by the numerous citations. WP:CRYSTAL would apply if there were speculation in the article about what the show would consist of, other than the fact that it will pull footage from Engine Sentai Go-onger, but the article does not include that (and PR season articles never do, as most editors actively make sure to pull any information like that out when added). This article is, put simply, a stub that can benefit from being filled out (something that will be slow-going until the official website, promos, and toys begin hitting TV/store shelves between now and the assumed February 2009 startdate). But it makes no sense whatsoever to delete. Arrowned (talk) 01:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's all guesswork; there is no official confirmation that a show is even going to be filmed (the Australian article is from a political silly-season roundup article). This is why we have WP:CRYSTAL around, to put a lid on this kind of speculation. Saban has filed for trademarks; so what? That's what they do. They may be planning to make a series in 2011 or something; they may be making a new season of one of the previous versions of the franchise. We don't know. If it can't be verified, it doesn't belong here. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is confirmed, including by that silly Aussie article. The trademarks would not be put in place for something three years from now, and there are never new seasons of old footage. Everything is verified, and everything should belong in the article as it stands.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm adding a second citation from the New Zealand Film and Video Technicians' Guild that should remove any more doubt that a new season of PR begins filming this month. Arrowned (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Confirmed details" section

[edit]

When we start editing this article regularly, i feel it is better not to include the "Confirmed details" section as it is unprofessional. Anybody agree?. Mythdon (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any "confirmed details" as they were put on the Jungle Fury article stemmed from factual and sourced information about the contents of the show, either through news agencies or toy catalogues or other items. Similar information would have a place on this article as well.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But as far as you feel, would the similar information be in its own section or at the introduction of the article?. Mythdon (talk) 05:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It depends on what the information entails.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. By the way, do you feel that "Confirmed details" sections are unprofessional in any way, shape or form?. Mythdon (talk) 08:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving article

[edit]

We previously put it at "Power Rangers: RPM" due to that being what it was trademarked under, but fully expected it to eventually be moved to "R.P.M." as the franchise has set periods in acronyms as a precedence courtesy of S.P.D. Now that R.P.M. is shown with periods on the toy boxes, it's safe to move. This is just a note signifying why the move was made. Arrowned (talk) 04:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary redirects

[edit]

I have created the following redirects this article for now:

I created them as temporary redirects until we gather enough information for them to exist as articles. Do any of you approve of this?. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 09:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have created replacement redirects to reflect the articles current name:

This one was an article at some time but I redirected it to this article for size and sourcing reasons:

Do any of you approve of these new redirects?. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 22:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see no issue with any of them - afterall, redirects are cheap. JPG-GR (talk) 03:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Yong Bosch as Adam Park the Blue Lion Ranger

[edit]

I know this isn't meant to be here. I don't know why but some people stated Johnny Yong Bosch/Adam Park would be the Blue Ranger of Power Rangers: RPM. I guess I should go change it (To Be Bold) unless they have any source which I doubt they have. 121.120.109.177 (talk) 16:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox temporary removal

[edit]

For the time being, I think the infobox on this article should be disposed of as the infobox does not have enough information for a purpose. Can we just describe the information in the form of prose for the time being?. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 02:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is fine.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just because something is fine doesn't mean there isn't room for improvement. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What's there to improve? It's an infobox.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Because having the infobox on this page is excessive for the time being. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:46, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Says you and who else?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just me as far as I know. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hear Daniel Ewing's character is the black ranger

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
No need for this. Moot. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 02:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should I add it?

Daniel Ewing is reported to be playing Dillion, the black ranger—sinister falcon (talk) 16:14, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no legitimate proof from anything like Disney itself, or newspaper/website articles. While I have every faith that FuryDiamond's rumor is correct (he did this same thing last year when informing the fandom that Aljin Abella would be Theo/Blue), we can't add info like that to this article without legitimate sourcing, and a fan's word isn't going to cut it. Arrowned (talk) 19:34, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FuryDiamond's websites are forbidden from use on Wikipedia because they all claim to be the actor's official website and he has taken information from Wikipedia in the past without saying where he got it (namely the 30 Sentai Encyclopedia data).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Several new cast members

[edit]

A few acting agency sites have confirmed more cast memebers.

Olivia Tennet

Adelaide Kane

James Gaylyn

Charlie McDermott

Murray Keane

should I add them--Abomasnow (talk) 08:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have these websites?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep

Murray keane

my evidence for charlie is in page three

look at the television section

hope that's enough--Abomasnow (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's enough for the three that those pages are about.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

is ranger wiki a reliable source?

[edit]

Is it because they have four episode titles. [1] User:Abomasnow (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. They are a user created site like IMDB and cannot be used as a reliable source ever.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
..you know, kinda like this one. Raxfrost (talk) 13:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Ironic isn't it?66.157.30.183 (talk) 18:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rangerwiki is actually like wikipedia. Uchu 40 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uchu40 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

promo out on youtube, the names of the rangers, the yellow ranger's actress & name change and the rest of the cast

[edit]

I came across a promo a official one but not a tv one rather one that wasn't meant to be seen by the public and in the promo it states that the name for Eka Darville's character as the Red Ranger is Scott while the promo also confirms Ari Boyland will be playing Flynn the Blue Ranger, now the Yellow Ranger's name has been changed from Kayla to Summer and Summer will be played by Rose McIver, while the Green Ranger's name is Ziggy who will be played by Milo Cawthorne, and like on the R.P.M. page itself Daniel Ewing's character Dillon is confirmed to be the Black Ranger on the show. Now for the rest of the cast now the allies there will be a woman on the show named Dr. K who will be played by Olivia Tennet, while James Gaylyn who played the ancient sensei in Ninja Storm, voiced Zeltrax in Dino Thunder in S.P.D.'s Wormhole, as well voiced the Orangehead Kryobots in S.P.D. and voiced Volcon and Cheetar in Operation Overdrive will be playing Colonel Truman who is the father of Scott the Red Ranger and now the villains the american counterpart to Go-Onger's Kegalesia will be known as Tenaya 7 and she will be played by Adelaide Kane. Ryulong if you get the chance could this info be added to the R.P.M. page since a official trailer as surfaced?

Red Polar Bear Ranger (Red Polar Bear Ranger 21:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is Youtube your source?. If so, don't add any of that information. Youtube is no way a reliable source. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 22:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'd log in if I remmebered my info, but here's the source, so question it now.

http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/entertainment/watch/v17459688NHnWqCf5 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.113.224.59 (talk) 00:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Veoh is not a reliable source either. It's reliability is no different from Youtube as it is also a video website. Read WP:RS and WP:V for more information. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 01:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To be more specific, online video sites can only be used as reliable sources when the uploader can be proven to be legitimately from the company involved. If, for example, this video showed up on a Disney Youtube or Veoh channel (unlikely, as Disney has their own video services at Disney.com). Unless that happens, the video cannot be used as a source for Wikipedia. Arrowned (talk) 03:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So in other words, you're saying a random individual is an unreliable source, where a well known company is a reliable source when it comes to videos?. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. The official community consensus writeup can be found at Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Are IRC, MySpace, and YouTube reliable sources? Arrowned (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How exactly can you argue with it? Oh no, excuse me, it's clearly fake. Yeah, that's no excuse, believing even the slightest it could be fake. Just look at the video. Who would be able to make that if not for an actual source? Please, by all means, argue with this logic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.113.224.59 (talk) 03:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Except nobody said it was fake. It's obvious to all PR fans that this is legitimate. But Wikipedia has rules and policies that must be followed, and this video does not function as a source under those policies due to the fact that it's been uploaded by an anonymous fan. Again, it would have to be uploaded directly by Disney for us to be able to cite it. Arrowned (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just like what ALMOST happened to Jungle Fury last year, if copyright comes into play, then there's a good chance that this article could get deleted before the season even premieres (on Thursday 7th March 2009).Scouser1961 (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The air date is march 7

[edit]

Go to this and look at Saturday 03/07 10:00am. Powergate92Talk 01:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This cannot be used as a reliable source because it is not the national listings.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Beauty of Wiki

[edit]

I find it kinda annoying we KNOW the actors/actresses (via the official promo), but we can't post it, as the promo did not post their actual names ._. Sometimes I hate wikipedias rules XD Myzou (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No one likes Wikipedia's (strict) rules. Yet, if that happens, a lot of fake information as well as inaccurate and possible vandalism will happen like crazy so that's how it goes, whether we like it ot not. 60.51.158.245 (talk) 13:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe if Wiki didn't allow every single person to post and just had a reliable staff to update articles, they could lessen up on the rules and we wouldn't have this problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.37.71.133 (talk) 11:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with that is Wikipedia is so incredibly massive that having any sort of staff to just handle individual articles is an incredibly daunting endeavor. Arrowned (talk) 19:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

R.P.M. will be the last season

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Worry January 2010. Anything else is WP:CRYSTAL.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like R.P.M. will be the last season.[2] Powergate92Talk 00:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Something explicitly from Disney or Ranger Productions would be better than an Auckland area newspaper.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, they just need to find a new studio --Numyht (talk) 13:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---I agree it does not look like the end of the series but rather the end of the filming in New Zealand that is all I can say the franchise is not dead for now I can see the filming be moving elsewhere just like in 2002 when they stopped filming in California after Wild Force and I agree with Ryulong too on this matter. Red Polar Bear Ranger Red Polar Bear Ranger (talk) 04:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC) (Red Polar Bear Ranger[reply]

More confirmation on RPM being the last season, and this is from two more news reports. [3] [4] henshinagogobaby 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Both of those refer to the New Zealand article and are mirrors (well, the NY Post one because the Fox news one is nonexistant).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am not entirely sure what's up with that second link; it only seems to not work with direct linking. By going to myfoxny.com and manually searching for articles on "Power Rangers", I found a working version of it with the exact same link. At any rate, the link is actually a stream from on-air news at about 7:45am this morning, and while it quotes the NY Post article as it source, they're very clear about saying "After 17 years, Disney has stopped producing new episodes". Arrowned (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see the issue; there was something wrong with that link as henshinagogobaby posted it (invisible spaces where there shouldn't be any? I've never actually seen that problem before). I manually fixed it. Arrowned (talk) 15:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion is beginning to go nowhere rapidly, as there appears to be no official press release from Disney or Ranger Productions. If anybody finds an official press release from Disney AND Ranger Productions stating that Power Rangers: RPM is the final season, then it will be confirmed that RPM is the end. Until then, not much can be done by talking around in circles.--Tomballguy (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Chris[reply]

It's NOT the end of Power Rangers

[edit]

Statement from Disney/Bandai America that the show/toy line/brand is not cancelled: Despite some of the rumors circulating the web, the Power Rangers are not going away in 2010. Disney and Bandai America continue to be committed to the Power Rangers Brand. In fact, Disney is producing a Season 18 and Bandai America will continue to develop action figures and toys for fans and collectors of all ages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.179.164.194 (talk) 22:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for that info? Powergate92Talk 23:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right here: http://henshinjustice.com/2009/03/20/breaking-news-power-rangers-lives —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.37.71.155 (talk) 03:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bandai do not make the final call, Disney do. This was to cover their asses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. R.K.Z (talk • contribs) 05:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there is still no word from Disney or Bandai on this and Dr. R.K.Z I do not think Bandai made that up personally its not a lie nor was it a ever a April fool's joke. Red Polar Bear Ranger Red Polar Bear Ranger (talk) 23:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)(Red Polar Bear Ranger[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Its RPM not R.P.M.

[edit]

If you watch Power Rangers: RPM you will see that the logo shows it as RPM not R.P.M. so i think the article should be move to Power Rangers: RPM. Powergate92Talk 21:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The logo is rarely used as a source, as they show it without a semi colon. All (although minor) press released regarding RPM have been naming it as R.P.M., which is why the article is named such. Myzou (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ziggy before or after Dillon?

[edit]

The amount of back and forth on this is crazy, so I figure we better sit down and actually discuss it. People who prefer the former seem to do so to follow the numbering scheme of the team's chest logos (Ziggy is #4, Dillon is #5), while people who prefer the latter assumedly want the Rangers listed in the order they morphed for the first time. Which option does everyone prefer? Arrowned (talk) 07:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't care, I thought I saw someone say Dillon had to go before Ziggy so I changed it to that. ---Shadow (talk) 08:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Arrowned Ziggy is #4, Dillon is #5 so it should be listed that way. Powergate92Talk 17:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The new opening lists Ziggy before Dillon as well, which is what some past seasons have been based on, when leadership past Red was not designated. Myzou (talk) 02:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. K

[edit]

Is she Agoraphobic? The way she never leaves the base, as if she had a fear of it, on top of the fact she justified leaving the base by saying that they were in a dome, so technically they were still inside, seemed to me like she may be Agoraphobic, not just anti social. Myzou (talk) 02:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where is either of those mentioned?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All in today's episode. But agoraphobia would be an assumption at this point (and still up in the air considering she did leave to go kick crime cartel butt), so it's definitely something I wouldn't add to the article if that's what you were implying, Myzou. Arrowned (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't a claim like this require a reliable source cited?. —Mythdon (talk) 02:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If it was stated in the show explicitly, then no.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I wasn't asking to add it to the page, I was just curious if others got that vibe from what she was saying, as she may state it in the future (Well, the rangers might). Myzou (talk) 00:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, Myzou. I think this thread falls under the forum-ish category. If you weren't asking to add it to the article, then I that leads me to assume that you unintentionally started a forum-ish topic. —Mythdon (talk) 00:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was discussing article content, which has since been edited and removed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

[edit]

I'd like to stress that the correct naming for the rangers this season is inverse to the usual. The color comes after 'ranger', thus Ranger Red, Ranger Black etc. Also Zords are Zord Attack Vehicles, Rangers are Ranger Operators. These are all explicitly used in the show.

The names for the nine zords have been released through the toys and 'Shark' is not used at all. Raxfrost (talk) 07:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nine? There are twelve Zords in RPM. Digifiend (talk) 00:35, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The comment you replied to is from April 2009. It is currently September 2009.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Own Article?

[edit]

Considering how much info there is about Dr. K so far, and more is to come, should she be given her own article, or possibly a subsection in the rangers article? She has more info than Clare, and she used to have her own article, until being merged into Ranger Like Allies, but there is no real place for Dr. K to merge into to create a main article. As they don't have enough allies, making an Allies in Power Rangers: RPM page wouldn't do much good. Just curious as to what should be done. There's a lot to say about her, and filling up half a page on one person in a TV show page is a bit much. 70.231.234.98 (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is generally an article created for the secondary characters given enough time for the show being on the air. This would theoretically be placed at Allies in Power Rangers: RPM or List of Power Rangers: RPM characters.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just a bit of a related question. You link to the red link "List of Power Rangers: RPM characters". If you don't mind, would that be the new formatting for Power Rangers character articles? Thanks. —Mythdon t/c 22:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tenaya 7

[edit]

Who the hell wrote that she's Dillion's sister when it hasn't even been stated or alluded to on the show?66.157.30.183 (talk) 17:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreeded, even if we say for argument sake that she was was same woman that was with Dillion's in his flashback (no evidence yet BTW) that still would not prove that she was his sister. Several other possibilties exist such as friend, girlfreind, cousin etc. Once again to reiterate we don't even know if Tenaya 7 has any connection whatsoever to the woman in the flashback so noting should be stated regarding any connection to Dillian unless explicatly stated in the show.--76.71.215.237 (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's pretty obvious that it is her in the flashback, just saying. But true, we can't add anything regardless. ---Shadow (talk) 23:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no it is not obvious. We have Gem and Gemma as brother/sister why would they do it again in one season? That's ridiculous. Also, I agree it could be another friend or possibly a cousin (not that it would matter because they still have another relative). Also isn't Dillon a human with Venjix technology whereas Tenaya 7 was a robot from the jump?66.157.30.183 (talk) 03:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never said sister. Even if she was, who cares. Robot? Venjix COULD be lying to her. Also, it obviously was here in the flashback. Same Hair, Same voice. ---Shadow (talk) 04:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a fan forum. This is a page to improve the article Power Rangers: RPM. Also, no fan assumptions.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's irrelevant because we are discussing the article.66.157.30.183 (talk) 18:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is this discussion even about anyway? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An unknown user edited the article several days ago to claim Tenaya 7 was Dillon's sister, something that is obviously conjecture at this point, and was fairly quickly reverted. Arrowned (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So you're saying this dealt with some sort of speculation? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:20, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, yes.66.157.30.183 (talk) 18:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden note in episode titles

[edit]

Just minutes ago, I have just added an addition to the following hidden note of the episodes section:

Please only use secondary sources for non-hidden episode titles and airdates, such as tvguide.com or the Jetix schedule at tvlistings.zap2it.com. Episode titles released by reliable members of online communities, such as those below this message, must be hidden until a secondary source verifies them, due to WP:V

This addition is:

Episode titles and airdates which come from fansites, forum postings, etc, are not to be included in this list, hidden or not.

Resulting in

Please only use secondary sources for non-hidden episode titles and airdates, such as tvguide.com or the Jetix schedule at tvlistings.zap2it.com. Episode titles released by reliable members of online communities, such as those below this message, must be hidden until a secondary source verifies them, due to WP:V. Episode titles and airdates which come from fansites, forum postings, etc, are not to be included in this list, hidden or not.

Do any of you approve of this, or shall it be reverted? Could my addition use copyediting? What do you think? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 22:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The addition is entirely inappropriate. The titles are listed because we get them and they are hidden because they cannot be yet proven. Changing the status quo will not help.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Ryulong. JPG-GR (talk) 05:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to put the addition back then. As a totally unrelated statement, since I don't feel like doing it anywhere else, you recently reverted my episode list edit at Power Rangers: Time Force. If you'd like, can you please discuss your revert with me on my talk page? I have kept your revert intact by the way. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gem and Gemma

[edit]

I merged both characters into one paragraph because after reading their bios, I found them to be rather redundant. They both say the same things, but with the use of different gender pronouns. Throughout the show thus far, they've done everything together. But if Gem and Gemma do anything major that sets them apart and establishes them as individuals, then separate paragraphs would be appropriate. Yes, some may argue that Gemma teamed with Scott once, but that really didn't develop her character individually from Gem. Pitstain (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This paragraph, in merging, says 'They have incredibly hyperactive, childlike personalities, to the annoyance of the others; there's a dark side to this, as they were happily intending to bomb from the air a Venjix factory that they knew had prisoners in it (ep 18)', but episode 18 has not aired as of yet, so this is a typo, or speculation—which, as I understand it, needs to be backed up with a source.58.168.68.37 (talk) 04:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's a typo; that happened in ep 17. And the episode number really doesn't need to be mentioned anyways; the sourcing is all in the character article. Arrowned (talk) 05:08, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After new actions taken by Gem in the new episode, I'm assuming if someone wanted to take the time, it'd be possible to create two seperate entries for Gem and Gemma that are not seemingly identical. The first parts will ALWAYS be identical, as they were introduced together. However, that can't make it so they don't get one the entire time~ 70.231.230.175 (talk) 07:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This would more or less be more effective in discussing such a change at Talk:RPM Power Rangers. On this article, they don't have any individual characterization. If it's necessary, they can be given separate sections on the character list.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:49, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gem & Gemma's ranger numbers are 7 & 8, not 6 & 7; #6 relates to the Carrigator/Crocodile Carrier zord, which is unmanned. ChangingThe Talking Toaster (talk) 16:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dillon's Invincibility

[edit]

I would like to point out the page says Dillon's impenetrable shield blocks almost all attacks, when it has been stated by Dr. K that if it works like its supposed to, It would be able to block any attack Venjix could throw at it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.47.214 (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I added those listings, I used the word "almost" because Dr. K clearly explained that his ability wasn't perfect; if he doubted it would work, it wouldn't deflect attacks. This can clearly be seen in the first episode he attempts to use it in. Arrowned (talk) 14:58, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: rejected. At the absolute least there is no consensus for a move. –MuZemike 20:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Power Rangers: RPM → Power Rangers RPM — [5] [6] [7] Official Power Ranger sites do not have colons in the names of the seasons. Heavydata (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Can someone who isn't obviously a friend of Ryulong please post their opinion? Four friends commented while nobody outside of his circle has commented. So if you're reading this and have a minute of free time, post your thoughts on this proposed move, whether it's support or oppose. Heavydata (talk) 08:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The move is not going to happen. Just move on.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well why don't we let someone besides your buddies and pals post on here and see what they think? Heavydata (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No one else has bothered to comment and it's certainly been a week since then. Powergate92 and JGP are both editors of this topic area and they have made their arguments against this radical move.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I guess every single person who disagrees with you must be part of the same group, all plotting against you. That belief is a well-known mental illness: paranoid schizophrenia. Everyone other than you has made excellent arguments as to why the pages shouldn't be moved. Meanwhile, you have made no arguments other than posting deliberate, manufactured lies with malice to smear your opponents. You can't win based on the strength of your arguments, so you resort to false accusations and character assassination instead. If your arguments were sound, you'd have continued to make arguments, but they're not, so you resort to manufacturing lies. I've dealt with people like you before. You people are all the same: every time something doesn't go your way, you begin ranting about how everybody other than you is part of some conspiracy. Guess what, they're not, and you're a kook, no different from the conspiracy theorists who made the 9/11 pages into editing minefields. Who the hell are you to declare who is a meat puppet and who isn't? You have no authority; you're just someone with a lunatic-fringe theory and a vendetta against anyone who's ever disagreed with you. jgpTC 16:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
... are you for real? Are you SERIOUSLY comparing me to 9/11?
No, I just want people who Ryulong can't influence to share their thoughts. I haven't done any "dirty tricks" to get my way like someone else has. Ryulong has no authority either, well at least he doesn't have authority now for obvious reasons. I've just requested for Colons to be removed, and every few days another one of Ryulong's friends posts why "he" thinks the colons should. If they don't agree with me that's fine, but every single person who has opposed this is a friend/buddy/pal/amigo of Ryulong. The IP is a meat puppet, and I stand by everything I've stated before and I won't change. Oh by the way when are the admins gonna do anything to me since you reported me for being a BIG MEANIE by asking you a question and posting something you didn't agree with, which automatically means by your logic, that I was stalking, harassing, and vandalizing. Since I was obviously doing all three, why haven't the admins banned me yet? HUH? Heavydata (talk) 16:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You just said "every single person who has opposed this is a friend/buddy/pal/amigo of Ryulong" but I opposed and I'm not a friend of Ryulong. Powergate92Talk 19:24, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alright I was wrong, all are Ryulong and friends except Powergate92, sorry. We should get more people to tell us what they think though... Heavydata (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever. There is not going to be a move of fifty pages because of a fucking punctuation mark.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:30, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

RPM=Racing Performance Machines?

[edit]

I found this here:http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PowerRangers if you look at the power rangers list. Is TVTropes a verifiable source? I'd assume it isn't. Does anyone know what RPM actually stands for? Kairos (talk) 05:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unimportant to the article, really.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's a bit of a lazy attitude, I think. Still, episodeguides.com also lists RPM as Racing Performance Machines (here: http://www.episodeguides.com/scripts/getshow.php?s=0x2bb6&p=index&m=) and so does everywhere else when it is asked (e.g. answers.com, yahoo answers etc.). I think its verifiable enough.The Talking Toaster (talk) 16:13, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Power Rangers Samurai - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 00:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disney will be involved in all again soon, i'll show! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.60.235 (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Power Rangers Megaforce which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:15, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Power Rangers RPM & Kamen Rider Dragon Knight

[edit]

Does Power Rangers RPM look like A ABC Drama tv show, Because this has a lot of drama and a lot of NZ Fights and stunts. But did it air alongside Kamen Rider Dragon Knight? Because 2009 was a Super Hero Time in America when Power Rangers & Kamen Rider came together on the USA Kamen Rider Dragon Knight: Los Angeles, California & Tokyo, Japan. Power Rangers RPM: Auckland, New Zealand & Tokyo, Japan. Was this the Super Hero Time of 2009 in America? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PascalMuganyizi (talk • contribs) 23:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Power Rangers RPM: A drama?

[edit]

I know RPM was a dark season with serious themes and all that but is it actually a drama season of Power Rangers? Is it because of the music that they composed to look like a drama? And is it a thriller? Because of thrilling scenes and scary scenes. Is it actually a drama? for Power Rangers? The season has a Auto Racing/Grand Prix/Cyberpunk motif, with computers and a virus. PascalMuganyizi (talk) 00:14, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've said this time after time, once someone challenges a genre, it can only be added back if you have a reliable source that refers it as that genre. JDDJS (talk) 17:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What can you tell that RPM's not a drama/thiller season of Power Rangers? How can you tell, and how do you know about all this? PascalMuganyizi (talk) 16:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Power_Rangers_RPM&oldid=1208316821"