User talk:Dr. R.K.Z

Welcome!

Hello, Dr. R.K.Z, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Academic Challenger 02:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to National Wrestling Alliance

Do not post rumors and speculation, they will be reverted. Neither the NWA nor TNA have said anything about a spilt. TJ Spyke 11:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh...whatever. Dr. R.KZ. 15:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD tag removal

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Notable animated series finales (1990s) — it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. (This also refers to Notable animated series finales (1980s) and Notable animated series finales (2000s). These AFDs have closed, but please remember this in the future.) --Core desat 06:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No reasons were given, which I think is what is needed to make such nominations plausible, there should be a rule demanding that valid and appropriate credentials be given to why the articles should be taken out. If it said "should be merged in Series Finale", I would NOT have deleted it. But since it had nothing, I deleted it.

Dr. R.K.Z. 18:01, 24th March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:4439224.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:4439224.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This edit summary is uncalled for

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Homefill 19:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've made plenty of insults yourself pal. Pot, kettle, black. Leave the FG guides alone. I've reported your "clean up" efforts, expect ALL FG episodes to be locked until you cease your activities on the guides and go elsewhere here.

Dr. R.KZ. 21:01, 28th March 2007 (UTC)

Stop trying to make a POINT

Please stop the reverting. By your own admission, you are doing it to be disruptive. This sort of behavior, coupled with your history of personal attacks marks you as an editor that is missing the whole point of Wikipedia, let alone AGF. We have a legitimate disagreement about editorial style; the place to settle it is on the articles talkpage and through our diuspute resolution process, not by making personal attacks on other editors. I must demand that you stop characterizing the edits of other editors as vandalism, that you follow our policy of [[WP:|assuming good faith]], and that you stop with the personal attacks. Thank you. Homefill 21:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is my opinion that what you do is constantly vadalize and impede the structure of a very informative structured environment. What you consider that opinion to be in your own view is no concern of mine.

I have read on your own user page that you now regret your "harsher hand approach" and are having second thoughts of going around the, aggresive means of addressing people who fight to retain the "Cultural References", keep up that behaviour and maybe I WILL respect your stance

And please stop pressing the "Yale school rule book" of what passes for procedures in my face. Speak like an individual without them for once. One would think you're taking a non-paying job far too seriously.

May 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Momusufan 16:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to the Doctor Who episodes, I did that because they were too elongated, look at other serial summaries to see how a plot should be detailed in an article. I cleaned it up, that should not be considered "Vandalism", but rather an attempt at clarifying the article.

AfD nomination of Superman III: The Junkyard Cut

I've nominated Superman III: The Junkyard Cut, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Superman III: The Junkyard Cut satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superman III: The Junkyard Cut and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Superman III: The Junkyard Cut during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Phydend 21:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove it. The project's been dead for months. No argument from me.

Dr. R.KZ. 01:22, 15th June 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Prsuperlegends.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Prsuperlegends.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Prsuperlegends.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Prsuperlegends.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ScrewAttack

The IP vandal I referred to was the one editing the article right before you, and I inadvertently reverted your edits as well. No reason to resort to name calling for an honest mistake. In fact, you did the same thing by reverting me again, thereby putting back the anon's edits as well.--Atlan (talk) 11:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise. Dr. R.K.Z

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:C719391q8gr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:C719391q8gr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use more edit summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Smurfs Go Pop!, you will be blocked from editing. --Pumpmeup 08:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How was that vandalizm? It was cementing concrete fact. All of a sudden additional information is a bannable offense? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. R.K.Z (talk • contribs) 08:27, 4 November 2007

See WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY. Additional content without proper sources placed is vandalism. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...This was about source citing? Thanks contribs 18:59 5th November 2007 (UTC)

Hey, man. I'm actually not an administrator, so I'm not sure I can help you out with this. Sorry. C1k3 22:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you were...nevermind, it's seemingly be settled contribs 02:53 6th November 2007 (UTC)

BTW, you have as just as much power as I do, and weight to throw :-). Sometimes while patrolling for vandals I make mistakes with my warnings, as everyone does. In future, if you have a problem with someone's comments on your talk page, try taking it up politely with them. Sorry for any hassle caused. Cheers, Pump me up 10:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)#[reply]

You're fired. ^_^ contribs 13:57 27th December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:A545ac193ada816bae3432f068b93688.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A545ac193ada816bae3432f068b93688.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:80m.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:80m.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to John Cena appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Zenlax ^T ^C ^S 19:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Star Trek movie curse

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Star Trek movie curse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion/merging of DBZ characters is going on by stealth. I've gone to deletion review to ask about the legitimacy of the decisions. Feel free to come too here :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_September_27

OsFan

i still think i pursue petty agendas —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.163.153 (talk) 19:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou stupid idiot

Signing talk page comments

Hello, Dr. R.K.Z. When you made this talk page post, you forgot to sign your comment. I have marked the comment as unsigned, so editors will have an easy time finding out who made the comment at what time. You can sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment. If you start signing your comments, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time. —Mythdon t/c 06:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to The Waters of Mars, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 19:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh for the love of....

Please try and remain civil. Our content policy states that all material is to be supported by reliable, third-party sources referenced in the article. Mentioning in a very rude edit-summary that John Barrowman confirmed your claims on TV does not satisfy the requirement. Read over this advice on how to cite television programmes, and that will probably enable you to include the information appropriately. Thanks. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 20:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The rumors about the Power Rangers

I learned about recent reports about the show being canceled but at the same time there have been rumors floating around Mighty Morphin Power Rangers Seasons 1-3 being reaired and unedited in place of a new season if this talk about RPM being canceled is true so don't go and jump the gun yet. At the same time there has also been mention about Bandai making new MMPR toys outside of the Super Legends toyline if its confirmed about the return of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers on tv. Louis Marinucci 03:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC) (UTC)RedPolarBearRanger (talk)

I was not jumping the gun, I was very much itterating Bandai WERE initiating damage control, this was BEFORE MMPR's HD remastering or other toylines were announced in mentioning.

AfD nomination of Grimlord

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Grimlord. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimlord. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dr. R.K.Z! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 493 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Hugo Savinovich - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Carlos Cabrera - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jackie Marchand - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Masaomi Kanzaki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Duane Capizzi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Slack (writer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Marty Isenberg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Judd Lynn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carlos Cabrera

The article Carlos Cabrera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unfreferenced BLP, sourced only to a WWE fan site.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Unitasock (talk) 22:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fictional history of Spider-Man

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Fictional history of Spider-Man. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional history of Spider-Man (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional history of Spider-Man

There is a discussion now about an article you are one of the major contributors too. Talk:Fictional_history_of_Spider-Man#Rewrite_and_replacement It concerns replacing the entire article with something fairly unrelated. Dream Focus 10:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Garber

The article David Garber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only sourced to IMDB at the moment

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Audio theatre an article to audio dramas

Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it) , please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. And possibly it could help to contact other people that they should help also. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 05:46, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Fantom.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fantom.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.super3.net/imgserie/fantom.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987 TV series) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Digifan23 (talk) 23:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Harry Osborn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MC2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continued vandalism

~~This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Pumaman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.~~

Because this is not your first warning, I'm contacting administrators on this topic. Triacylglyceride (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto your edit at Combat Zone Wrestling. You seem to put a lot of time into editing comic-book articles, then every now and then you just drop some vandalism. You're going to get your account blocked if you keep it up. Why do you want to waste all of our time with this? Triacylglyceride (talk) 15:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just apologizing -- I hadn't noticed that it had been four years since your previous warning for vandalism. I've inserted the more appropriate warning below.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Pumaman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Triacylglyceride (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, forgot the /del tag. Triacylglyceride (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the vadalism, I was just doing it for the lulz, I'll stop now

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited M.A.S.K., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chikara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Aliens vs Wizards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wizard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited The Time, The Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Morris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited That Guy with the Glasses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One More Day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Gargoyles (TV series). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Breakfast Serials, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Breakfast Serials" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 23:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, An Earthly Child, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "An Earthly Child" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 18:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spider-Girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One More Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alternative versions of Mary Jane Watson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Prowler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie Original Motion Picture Soundtrack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie Original Motion Picture Soundtrack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie Original Motion Picture Soundtrack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBZFan30 (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:C719391q8gr.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:C719391q8gr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. DBZFan30 (talk) 02:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Douglas Sloan (television producer)

The article Douglas Sloan (television producer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douglas Sloan (television producer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Sloan (television producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Sloan (television producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Star Trek movie curse" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Star Trek movie curse. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 21#Star Trek movie curse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Lennart97 (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Breakfast Serials

The article Breakfast Serials has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Threshold (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Threshold (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threshold (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 00:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Threshold (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Threshold (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threshold (Doctor Who) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 21:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]