Talk:Potential acquisition of Disney by Apple
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Potential acquisition of Disney by Apple article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regarding CRYSTAL
[edit]Before anyone asks, here's why this article doesn't violate WP:CRYSTAL:
- CRYSTAL says
Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation, rumors, or presumptions
, emphasis on unverifiable. The speculation discussed in the article is very much verifiable. - CRYSTAL also says:
It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced. [...] Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included, though editors should be aware of creating undue bias to any specific point-of-view.
- This article is not just about the speculation itself; it also discusses the analysis of the speculation, as well as executives' response.
- The information covered in this article would be too much to incorporate into a section on either Apple Inc. or The Walt Disney Company, both of which are extremely large articles.
- CRYSTAL aside, the subject of this article clearly satisfies WP:GNG, with significant public interest and WP:SUSTAINED coverage from a vast array of some of the most highly reputable sources.
— InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good work on the article!
Tails Wx 13:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
citations
[edit]The first three paragraphs (lede) cite no references, and there are plenty to be found with a quick Google.com search. 184.166.97.71 (talk) 21:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Per MOS:LEADCITE, citations are not required nor necessary for the lead as this information is already sourced in the body of the article, with the lead serving as a summary of that material. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Low-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
- B-Class Disney articles
- Low-importance Disney articles
- B-Class Disney articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Disney articles
- B-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- B-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- B-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Brands articles
- Low-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- B-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles