Talk:Pier Paolo Vergerio

Lutheranism Low‑importance

	Pier Paolo Vergerio is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 35 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Pietro Paolo Vergerio

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain ^t/c 16:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pier Paolo Vergerio → Pietro Paolo Vergerio – Per VIAF it seems more common.[1]--Relisted Cúchullain ^t/c 17:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC) Eleassar ^{my talk} 22:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question - Google Books gives 170,000 vs 27,000 for the Pier form. How does http://viaf.org/viaf/51698984/ indicate otherwise? Isn't that just the VIAF cataloguers' preference? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is completely possible. It seems to be the Italian version of the name. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 11:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well actually both are the same name, Pier Paolo to Pietro Paolo as Jimmy is to James. But Pier Paolo is evidently more usual than the full form here. My question what exactly decides VIAF's listing? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - the article as it stands is by far the common form. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.