Talk:Philosophy of love

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article needs solid overview of current theories for referencing first section - perhaps Alan Soble, who I can't seem to access, or someone similar Jacobisq (talk) 10:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS Is Popper really a philosopher of love?!! News to me, but maybe.... 11:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

I agree. I think that this article needs a clearer overview and lead. Not only in the current theories section but in the general overview of the page as well, so that people can know what to expect when reading through the article. Plan525 (talk) 04:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Philosophies

We seem to have a lot of Western philosophies here. Are there no Eastern philosophies of love? Tbeasley0504 (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wait. It is here. It's small though. We need to add more information. Tbeasley0504 (talk) 00:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of Hindu theologian-philosophers, as well as scriptures and religious poetry, that talk about love, both love of God / Krishna / Bakhti, as well

as marital love or affairs - they have whole shastras about it, which could be considered 'philosophy' if Aquinus is.... Nathanielfirst (talk) 22:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not part of main love article?

This seems liked a subset of the main Love article with some text copied from (or to?) it directly... should this be embedded in that, or fleshed out more fully? I am no subject expert of course. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snarfa (talk • contribs) 20:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

wrong person?

Jean-Pierre Rousselot in the list of ppl doesn't seem like he had anything to do with love, instead he was into languages... instead I think the link should be Pierre Rousselot, a different person who wrote "The Problem of Love in the Middle Ages: A Historical Contribution" Nathanielfirst (talk) 17:14, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Spring 2023

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 April 2023 and 17 July 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Smerblah, Rjgoodwin (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rjgoodwin (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting of this article

This article seems to be written in an essay format, but it should be written in an informational formatting instead. It is not meant to convince people of a certain ideology. I'm going to work on rewording what is already written in my sandbox, and won't move it over to this page unless it is evaluated by others. I will add a link to my sandbox edits here once I begin working on this. Smerblah (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Special:MyPage/sandbox Smerblah (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]