Talk:Petta (film)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Semi-protected edit request on 25 December 2018

Change Artist of Marana Mass from "Anirudh Ravichander, S. P. Balasubrahmanyam, Rajinikanth (Voice Over)" to "Anirudh Ravichander, Mano, Rajinikanth (Voice Over)" Ram.velisetti (talk) 06:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Please keep in mind that all edits must be supported by published, reliable sources cited in the article. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 18:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2019

I have been a fellow member for some months now and have done few edits by now but still I haven't got any permission to edit semi protected pages ..can I know why ? Sdgyrsghdw (talk) 03:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. To be able to edit this page automatically, you need more than your current 9 edits. Sorry. DannyS712 (talk) 04:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2019

In the PLOT whole story has been written including the climax. Please remove it. Mayavarathaan (talk) 02:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Please see WP:SPOILERS - the plot should be included --DannyS712 (talk) 03:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC) DannyS712 (talk) 03:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

The Wikipedia spoilers section does convey a sensible reasoning, however the full detailing of a plot of a movie released one day back on a page will be negatively impacting the revenues of the movie, as well as it being unethical to the content creator and hundreds of technicians who work on such endeavour. This aggressive stand towards revealing entire plot just because it conforms to some guideline is counterproductive and will eventually drive away sensible users from the platform. Sreekanthgs (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Petta Plot

The plot should be removed for now atleast otherwise it will reveal the suspense element of the film. The plot can be added a week afterwards. Rahrumi (talk) 08:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

It would be against Wikipedia policies and guidelines to remove the plot, as Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED, and we have specific rules about Spoliers, specifically
"It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot."
We used to include "Spoiler warnings", but as explained in SPOILER we stopped doing that in 2007. Sorry, but the plot must stay. - Arjayay (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

wrong write up.

the daughter of a Reiki Healer, Mangalam (Simran). Please see the movie, mangalam is not a reiki healer she is a PRANIC HEALER.

PRANIC HEALING is a different type of energy therapy.

I hope you change this word, Thank you Janus Das (talk) 19:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 14 January 2019

Remove the Plot. The film has been released for only 3 days and you put up the whole plot. I didn't see a plot on "Viswasam". I will report this if you don't remove it. Cchris95 (talk) 01:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED and it is normal for film articles to have full plot sections immediately after the film release. See WP:SPOILER. And I will note that Viswasam does have a plot section, added shortly after your comment. Ravensfire (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

There is also now a plot summary at Viswasam. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Requested edit

In the third paragraph of the Plot section, there is a link to the DAB page Sasikumar, and User:DPL bot is complaining about the WP:INTDABLINK error. The link should be to M. Sasikumar. Narky Blert (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 January 2019

மின்னம்பலம் - பேட்ட ரஜினி

Br2020 (talk) 16:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2019

Box office collection

            Please change the box office collection of petta from ₹149 crore to 206.25 Cr. "Please change 149 crore to 206.25 crore"
     
            Source https://www.xappie.com/entertainment-view/petta-box-office-collection-day-13-15305 Dhinakaran19 (talk) 08:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: @Dhinakaran19: What is "xappie.com" that we could care what they think about Indian film financial data? We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. Do you know anything about who runs this site, or is it just some random website you found, and you're placing all your trust in? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Update petta box office

Update petta box office 250C Shivaguru krish (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done as you have not cited a reliable source - Arjayay (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjayay (talk • contribs) 19:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2019

SavinMichaels (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Petta (film)/Archive 1
Box office	₹250 crore

</ref>

}}

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

@SavinMichaels:  Not done The source doesn't say 250, and the 237 crore figure is attributed to a tweet from a regular person, not a professional financial analyst. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

References

Petta collection is wrong. Petta movie box office collection already reached 237 crores.

https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/petta-box-office-collection-day-18-rajinikanth-film-is-a-massive-hit-1440146-2019-01-27 Rajv67 (talk) 16:20, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

@Rajv67: As mentioned in the request above yours, the 237 crore figure is attributed to some random guy on Twitter. Surely you wouldn't just swallow some figure that a random person made up, would you? That wouldn't be too smart. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Today (6.2.2019) petta movie officaly crossed 300 crores please change it.... Sanjeeth R (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Collection

The movie crossed 300 crores Sanjeeth R (talk) 14:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:16, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2019

Petta worldwide gross is around 220 crores , Kindly check this article . https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/english/dna-epaper-dna/with+petta+rajinikanth+becomes+the+only+south+indian+actor+to+achieve+this+incredible+box+office+feat-newsid-107526867 Area wise break up of PETTA Collections also clearly suggests this. Kindly make these changes. Harihara19091965 (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Petta worldwide gross is only around 220 crores . https://www.xappie.com/entertainment-view/petta-box-office-collection-day-25-15773 Check this article too , even area wise collection break up for Petta is clearly mentioned . Kindly make changes . Thank you Harihara19091965 (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done @Harihara19091965: Please don't submit multiple requests about the same issue. You submitted four in the span of an hour. The mere existence of a website does not make the website inherently reliable. You've submitted two references, but are they reliable? Tell me what you know about who wrote the anonymous article at dailyhunt.in. What makes this site reliable in any way? Just because it exists? Same with Xappie.com. Do you know who the editor is? Are there any editorial standards? Do they hire actual journalists trained in standard journalistic practices? We only care what established mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything, not what faceless blogs and websites have to say. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2019

Harihara19091965 (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2019

Rajasekhar 1996 (talk) 06:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 06:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2019

gross 170 Crs Suban03 (talk) 12:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: the cited source clearly states 250 crore, and you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Sountrack category edit request

New soundtrack has been released with original background tracks by Sony. Shall we add them to the soundtrack category. Also the soundtrack section is being to long so a new page can be created. Thanks Ganeshiyer3000 (talk) 08:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Throwing out reference

@Ganeshh1996: I don't understand these changes. Superficially it looks like you decided of your own volition to totally disregard Times Now News's estimate, replacing it with First Post's estimate, thereby reducing the top estimate from 250 crore to 225. How exactly do you justify that change? That tends to look like you are just trying to find references that support your personal opinion/belief/wish, rather than allowing the breadth of reliable sources to say what they have to say, and the net result doesn't appear academically honest to me. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:32, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi . The times now article was an old article in February . The first post article is a recent article in December . That's the reason I made those changes . Definitely it's not my personal opinion ; I posted by what the recent articles had to say . Thank you. Ganeshh1996 (talk) 05:32, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Ganeshh1996: M-hm. Why would a newer article necessarily be more correct in a world where none of the Indian film financial claims are correct? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Ganeshh1996: Exactly what Cyphoidbomb has said. Also note that both news sources would have different agencies that provide them with the financial figures. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)