Talk:Pelasgus epiroticus
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 25 February 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 16:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Pelasgus epiroticus → Epirus minnow – As explained in the original move, this name seems to be more common in the relevant literature. Such literature is not extensive but in google scholar "Epirus minnow" returns 13 results[1] while "pelasgus epiroticus" 8.[2]. Most results overlap since the scientific name is usually mentioned alongside the colloquial name but it must be stressed that the source with most citations uses "Epirus minnow" as the common name. The author that contested the move asked for references which I added in the main text Kkostagiannis (talk) 08:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support semi-tentatively until and unless someone comes up with a good reason to oppose. WP:UE is a cool policy and "minnow" is English. Red Slash 03:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support per Red Slash. — Amakuru (talk) 22:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.