Talk:Palestinian insurgency in South Lebanon

Lebanon High‑importance

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Regarding terrorism

There were certainly terrorism involved in several cases, which is why those articles got the cat about that. But to classify the whole conflict as such is new to me. --IRISZOOM (talk) 21:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What I wrote three months ago still stands. Attacks like Avivim school bus bombing is already tagged with the Category:Palestinian terrorism but to classify the whole conflict as "terrorism" is another thing. Then you can as well add cats relating to for example massacres by Israel to articles about the bigger conflict. Would you also then add attacks in Gaza that have been described as massacres (such as in Shuja'iyya or Khuza'a) to any of the wars or larger conflicts there like 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict? --IRISZOOM (talk) 22:18, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avivim bombing

The article attributes it to the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP - which actually had a different name at the time), but the perpetrators actually belonged to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command (PFLP-GC), a completely different group. The Wikipedia article for the bombing, in fact, attributes it to PFLP-GC. The given date may also be wrong. Daydreamers (talk) 23:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 February 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove Syria from the list of belligerents, it does not make sense. Hafez had ousted the PLO supporting Salah Jadid. There is zero citation for Syria in this article (meaning it should not be presented) it isn't even in the category of wars that Syria has fought in. 218.186.135.10 (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The article currently has sourced references to Syrian involvement in the conflict. See, for example, the section titled "The Lebanese Civil War (first phase)". Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The (First Phase) section has citations for Syria aiding the Maronite government but none for it switching sides

Syria supported the Maronites as per the source but there is no proof that Syria switched sides to then support the PLO. So please remove Syria as an ally of the PLO and perhaps add it as a Third Combatant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.135.10 (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The ssnp bombed bashir gemayels compound they sheltered elias hobeika who was the commander at shatila very neutral behavior 2603:9001:4F16:A900:DC95:B58B:496A:1B10 (talk) 22:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Israel-Hezbollah conflict?

That was decades of occupation. It was a complete occupation. Not a “conflict” Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 16:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Israeli occupation of Southern Lebanon. Selfstudier (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That link should be added to this article, not “Israel-Hezbollah conflict”. Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 01:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 March 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athens_International_Airport to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellinikon_International_Airport

REASON: Article makes reference to a 1968 attack at Athens airport, which contains a hyperlink to the page [1]. This is incorrect, since that airport only came into operation in 2001.

The airport at which the 1968 attack took place was the old Athens Airport: [2]. The hyperlink should be altered accordingly Jeepvee (talk) 23:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jamedeus (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

REMOVE: "At the time, PLO's objective was to establish a single democratic state in all of historical Palestine with equal rights for Jews, Muslims in Christians"

This point has minimal sources. According to your other article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amin_al-Husseini, the PLO was starkly against the Jews in Palestine and had connection with Nazi Germany. 2605:59C8:13B5:B610:4067:FBB1:4CF8:2064 (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally according to your other article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization#:~:text=After%20concluding%20the%20meeting%2C%20the,and%20the%20liberation%20of%20Palestine.) "the PLO was founded on 2 June 1964. Its stated "complementary goals" were Arab unity and the liberation of Palestine." 2605:59C8:13B5:B610:4067:FBB1:4CF8:2064 (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This is supported by a reliable source. Wikipedia articles shouldn't be used to source other Wikipedia articles, and even then the facts in those articles don't necessarily contradict what's in this one. If you wish to propose a change, I suggest you find reliable academic sources to confirm what the PLO's objective was. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]