Talk:Pakistan–Russia relations

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History / Politics and law Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

International relations Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Kashmir conflict#Recent developments|18 September 2016 militant attack on an Indian Army base]] The anchor (#Recent developments) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

soviet pakistani relations

a separate article is needed on the USSR's relations with Pakistan. One is already in the simple english wikipedia now we need one here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.90.213 (talk) 23:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tatarstan and Caucasas Emirates

Since when did Pakistan show support for Muslim separatists in Russia? Pakistan never recognized any separatist regions in the Muslim Caucasus and when was the last time Tatarstan republic tried to seperate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.68.85 (talk) 07:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Pakistan–Russia relations

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Pakistan–Russia relations's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "The Economist":

From Soviet war in Afghanistan: Editorial (July 31, 2003). "Tricky diplomacy". The Economist. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
From Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq: Editorial (Jul 31st 2003). "Tricky diplomacy". The Economist. Retrieved 4 January 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No merge

Don't merge Russia and Soviet Union foreign relations articles, the two are not the same entity. --Soman (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Russia and Soviet Union are two different entities. NO merging required. --Sooraj (talk) 09:35, 11 Sept 2012 (UTC)

Proposed merge

I propose merging Pakistan–Soviet Union relations into Pakistan–Russia relations#Relations with Superpower: 1947-1991. Keeping in view that article was created in absolutely wrong manner by blanking section.

Oppose. Russia and Soviet Union are not the same, and as there were no Pakistan-Russia relations prior to 1917, this is not really a problem. Pakistan-Russia relations begin in 1991. --Soman (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Points are Valid. I agree, Russia and Soviet Union are not same. A new page needed for Pakistan-Soviet Union relations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.239.196.222 (talk) 02:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Russian Federation is the successor state to the Soviet Union — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.242.202 (talk) 03:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No consensus to merge. Fai zan 11:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment re other pages creation

@Soman: @Faizan:
Comment: The Pakistan–Soviet Union relations page was created here in July 2012, apparently as a result of the removal/copying of text from this page, per this edit. 220 of ^Borg 14:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Pakistan–Russia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]