Talk:Paestum

Architecture B‑class Top‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

World Heritage Sites High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy High‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

I have not disturbed the existing text, but have added a section describing the more major buildings in some detail--Anthony.bradbury 19:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Temple dedicated to Apollo?

I added the citation needed template for the statements concerning the dedication to Apollo, appearing to me almost unique in the literature and worth of a specific reference.--Filos96 23:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the site an explanation says that the temple erroneously attributed to Neptune (second temple of Hera) is actually a temple of Apollo in his role of a healer.46.5.253.24 (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

another illustration for "rediscovery"?

From the Met. Haven't uploaded to Commons yet because there will be a bulk upload at some point. —Luis (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected

Time to stop reverting and start discussing ... — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with it in its current form. I can't see any possible justification him or others breaching the NPOV policy by inserting his own personal opinion which is of course irrelevant. After all, "Wikipedia should not take a view as to whether an event was fortunate or not and "WP:NPOV is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus." doesn't seem to leave much doubt. 120.17.171.85 (talk) 18:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]