Talk:Over the Limit (2010)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Over the Limit (2010) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Over the Limit (2010) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 12, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 1, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that four separate wrestlers suffered legitimate injuries at WWE's Over the Limit pay-per-view?

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Over the Limit (2010) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualification]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualified]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Over the Limit (2010)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: (Quality is very good.)

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: (Everything is perfect in this section.)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: (All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every paragraph has at least one source/reference.)

C. No original research: (No original research found.)
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)

B. Focused: (Always stays on topic about the PPV.)
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (Captions and pictures are good)
Overall:
Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Much appreciated. NiciVampireHeart 17:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]