Talk:OpenID Connect

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the OpenID Connect redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

redundant references

References 1 and 2 are the same. --80.243.61.37 (talk) 10:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And external reference is the same as ref 1 and 2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.243.31.9 (talk) 15:18, 2016 January 31 (UTC)

?! Ajalban1973 (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

The edit at 12:30, 25 July 2016‎ by Serge10duke seems hugely problematic. The addition of a company I've never heard of (as someone in this industry), and the re-listing alphabetically (which just happens to list this company first) instead of by importance/size, combined with having that company's name as part of the editor's username, strongly indicates advertising. The company is certainly not relevant. 8.21.87.6 (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with OpenID?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Redirected since all info is already at target article. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is incredibly light on information, compared to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenID. Both pages claim they are on different topics, in that they both say "not to be confused with" each other.

However, as far as I can tell, OpenID Connect is in fact equivalent to OpenID 3.0. It seems clear from the FAQ on the OpenID Foundation's website (https://openid.net/connect/faq/) that this is a successor to OpenID 2.0, and the foundation seem to consider it their latest product and current recommendation. I also understand that the industry is conforming on this standard.

It therefore seems most accurate and useful to merge the OpenID Connect article into the OpenID article, and start talking about it as the latest version of OpenID. But I haven't done deep reading on this, so I may be missing something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nottrobin (talk • contribs) 16:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nottrobin: I've gone ahead and added suggested merge templates to OpenID Connect and OpenID to try and generate some discussion about this. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this seems like a reasonable merge. DoggieTimesTwo 17:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well. --Tusker (talk) 15:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While from a functional/historical perspective, OpenIDConnect may be regarded as "OpenID 3.0", from a technical perspective it is way different. They redesigned the spec from scratch. It is now an extension of the OAuth 2.0 standard, meaning it is not a separate protocol but an extra authentication layer built upon (or within) OAuth 2.0. Compare with OpenID 2.0 which was its own protocol, separate from OAuth 2.0 145.53.44.102 (talk) 06:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.