Talk:Nuclear power in Bangladesh

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Naming

There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huge POV problems in this article

The very first sentence is an opinion which is at least highly disputable, if not simply wrong. The second sentence appears to be about energy nation wide all sources (but this is quite unclear as well). Most of the rest of the article is about energy in general in the country and only the last piece is about nuclear.

If i were an administrator i would tag this article for a significant review or simply remove it. Paxus Calta (talk) 06:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just tagging the article wouldn't do much good, what's needed is some actual editing work. I've made a radical rearrangement that brings on-topic material to the beginning, and removed a POV statement. Perhaps someone else could now take a look to see if they can offer further edits. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Waste disposal section

The section on waste disposal seems to be primarily a generic discussion of nuclear waste disposal challenges and barely related to the topic of the article, which is nuclear energy in Bangladesh specifically. The subsections are even worse, presenting information that is dubious, unsourced or clearly unverified ("there is projected to be around 860 nuclear power plants" - ever seen List of nuclear reactors article?), and cherry picking from IPCC report. In general the whole section looks like a wikified discussion forum where proponents of nuclear energy are carefully countered by opponents using generic random facts and weasel words, rather than present clear and properly sourced picture of nuclear waste disposal in Bangladesh. Cloud200 (talk) 09:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]