Talk:Nuclear Waste Policy Act

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Added material on NWPA requirements for nuclear waste repositories, with sources. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 04:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Yucca Mountain - Nuclear Waste Repository.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

this article does a great job at illustrating the yucca mountain permanent repository. https://www.energy.gov/downloads/nuclear-waste-policy-act — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesotelo1218 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lesotelo1218 (article contribs).

Current status and lede?

Are there sources that discuss the current status?

I haven't read every word, but what I've read suggests to me that the process is currently stalled:

The US Congress amended the act in 1987 to designate Yucca Mountain.
Nevada vetoed it in April 2002 but Congress overrode the veto in July 2002.
Nevada appealed and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with Nevada in 2004.
At least one other jurisdiction filed suit to force Yucca Mountain to take their waste, including Aiken County, SC in 2011.

I think the lede should be dramatically rewritten, shortened to a summary like this. However, I believe others should know much more than I do about this. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just rewrote the lede consistent with this summary. Please modify this further in any way you think will make the article better ... but please keep the lede concise, containing the primary points -- including especially the current status. If the current status is different from this summary, I want to know. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]