Talk:North Transfer Station

North Transfer Station has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 11, 2020. (Reviewed version).

A fact from North Transfer Station appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2020, and was viewed approximately 3,608 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that North Seattle's waste transfer station has a viewing room and a playground?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/North Transfer Station.

Wikipedia

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Eco-friendly transfer station adds playground to be a good neighbor (Mahlum/DJC)
CityStream: New North Transfer Station (Seattle Channel)

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sanitation Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Seattle / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that North Seattle's waste transfer station has a viewing room and a playground? Source: Seattle DJC and SPU
- ALT1:... that North Seattle's waste transfer station has a green roof, solar panels, and skylights? Source: The Seattle Times

Reviewed: Milk War

Moved to mainspace by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 18:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

New article and it is long enough, no copyvios, the hook is interesting and is cited to the DJC. All that's needed is QPQ. Mccunicano ☕️ 06:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccunicano: QPQ added. Sounder Bruce 07:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I amended my original comment for talking about the wrong source, but the playground hook seems interesting considering its a waste facility. Mccunicano ☕️ 10:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:North Transfer Station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 01:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why not. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 01:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's complete, but is it operating?
- Fixed.
I haven't gone through the article yet but I can see the lead is a bit lacking. Maybe you need to add some history to it.

Could add some more building features too.
- Expanded lead.

"Community amenities, including the plaza and public artwork, were installed in March 2016 while work continued inside the buildings to install electrical and HVAC systems" Comma after 2016?

Or split the sentences to include the progress for each building instead.

Rewrote and split the sentence.

AGF on offline sources.

What a dump. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 06:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nova Crystallis: All done. Thanks for the review. Sounder Bruce 22:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dashes

I made an adjustment to the dashes used between numbers per the policy at MOS:ENTO. Hyphens are used for compound words, etc. But dashes are always used for figures or to represent the word "through."--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 22:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Esprit15d: The page number is literally "3-19". It's how government documents are typically formatted, so please use the script with more care. Sounder Bruce 22:59, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not willing to fight about it, so I won't push it further, but I literally cited the Wikipedia policy, which you have seemed to ignore. Also, that's not how hyphens are used even outside of Wikipedia. The endash is used for value ranges.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 23:05, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]