Talk:Nonlinear narrative

Literature Mid‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Electronic literature

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature articles

Rename

There was a suggestion made to rename this article; please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2008 February 1#Pulp Fiction. --Cinematical (talk) 22:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article from Nonlinear (arts) to Nonlinear narrative as the article doesn't contain any other uses of nonlinearity in the arts besides its use in narrative. dissolve ^talk 15:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I kinda think it's weird that under a section labeled "film," when they list the timeframes for analyzing the developement, there's a list of some of the films that were released in that time, but then below there's an entire list of movies, repeated. i feel like there should be some kind of convergence, where the article either gets rid of the list or takes the movies out of the time and leaves them for the list. either way will get rid of the repetition of imformation and clarify the article. Kendal Fong 23:31, 28 Oct 2009 (UTC)

Reasons for nonlinear narrative

The lead currently says that nonlinear narrative is

often used to mimic the structure and recall of human memory, but has been applied for other reasons as well."

I think a dedicated section, or at least paragraph, should say what the various reasons for its use are. I can't really get that from the article in its current form. Loraof (talk) 01:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nonlinear narrative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820001535/http://www.filmquarterly.org/issue_5504_right.html to http://www.filmquarterly.org/issue_5504_right.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]