User talk:Dissolve

Archives

congrats

Namaste! Dissolve,

On behalf of WikiProject India, I am inviting you to join our WikiProject. To see what is happening now in WikiProject India, follow our noticeboard. If you are not a member already, you can add your name here. If are already a member, disregard this message. Thank you.

Citation required in Corpus Christi Carol article

Regarding your editing my sentence on Jeff Beck's interpretation of Corpus Christi - thanks and no worries - however, you added that a citation is required - I attempted to clearly state that I am quoting Jeff Beck from his own CD's liner notes - perhaps you could write out the footnote/citation - from Beck's CD "Emotion & Commotion" appropriately - as I do not yet know how to create a Wiki footnote/citation myself? If you do so - many thanks. Aus Chia (talk) 10:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An inline citation is generally needed on Wikipedia when quoting someone. I can add a cite based on this info. Can you check the page number and the author of the liner notes? dissolve ^talk 16:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki page: Neenyo

I've created this page with sufficient information from what I've encountered on other similar music producers articles. I assume you've encounter many musician based articles based on your user page. I've read the g4, addressed 'Criteria for musicians and ensembles' points (1,2,3 & 5). The only similarities with the previously deleted page must be the discography. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacksonhewit (talk • contribs) 04:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're a notable producer, eventually someone else will write an article about you. If you want to be included in Wikipedia, you need to meet notability guidelines, which has more to do with having a good publicist than the quality of your work. dissolve ^talk 17:05, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a autobio, I'm submitting an article on a producer within Canada. I stated in the articles talk that it met 4 points under WP:MUSICBIO notability with refs in the article, however it still deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacksonhewit (talk • contribs) 20:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiz Khalifa

I've noticed you've done some edits on this article and seem perhaps familiar with the subject?... There have been some recent edits today (deletions of singles, etc.) and I can't figure out if they're vandalism or not. It would be a big help if you could maybe take a look. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 01:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its hard to keep up with the anon ip edits on that article when its not protected. Some times there are accurate edits but more often its vandalism. The deletion was a song that was released as an online video, but not as a single, so it was a valid deletion from the 'Singles' section. dissolve ^talk 18:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Big Picture (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big Picture (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Big Picture (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Uncle Dick (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dick Crest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dick Crest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Crest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Thisbites (talk) 06:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Samantha Mathis photo

Hi, how are you doing? i just did check out the article about Samantha Mathis and i realized there's not a picture of her. So, i just want to ask you for upload a picture. I'm telling you that because you are the lastest user that edited the article and it seems like you know how to do it. Thanks. EricaL2003 (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images on wikipedia need to be free use. Non-free images can't be used. I've yet to see a photo of Mathis that's available as free use, so haven't added one. When one turns up I'm sure someone will add it.dissolve ^talk 02:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Stone

Thank you, I appreciate it :) teammathi (talk) 06:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracy Spiridakos

Hello, I've included a citation from Radar online regarding her age. Was working on the edit as I got your message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanGarion (talk • contribs) 20:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your input on the article. RadarOnline is a gossip website. There is currently consensus in Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy that gossip sources are generally not considered reliable sources. There's currently a discussion on the article talk page about her age. Feel free to weigh in with your opinion. dissolve ^talk 05:14, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Elijah Ramos

Elijah Ramos is Filming Foxcatcher With Channing Tatum and Steve Carrel at this moment in Pennsylvania so i dont know any other links to that? Hulk3200 (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a collection of information that has been previously published and must be verifiable in a reliable secondary source before it can added. Kid, quit trying to add yourself to Wikipedia, it's annoying and a waste of everyone's time. If you're ever notable, someone else will write the article. dissolve ^talk 01:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My Dude If Your Thinking im Elijah Ramos Your Highly Mistaken And im not a kid trying to add myself to Wikipedia if you cant keep up with celebrity's its not my fault you think im lying but i understand if you have a reputation to hold up and find and delete what dose not seen right i understand but do not assume that and that's all i really have to say.

P.S. My Name Is Troy, Elijah Ramos Was On My Wrestling Team And Quit Because Of Acting So Please Do Not Assume.Hulk3200 (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Writing a biography of someone you have a personal relationship with is a conflict of interest, especially when the biography is based on private information and not published reliable sources. It's interesting how your username here is the same username as the actor you're a "fan" of on YouTube. Hey, I call it like I see it. This ain't my first time at the rodeo; I've been an editor here for 7 years, but I'll take your word for it... dissolve ^talk 04:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:SweetBabyGirl06

Hello, Dissolve. I notice that you have been dealing significantly with the above user and #173 IPs that have added unconstructive personal information to articles of actors. Feel free to comment about it at this sockpuppet investigation. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your help with this! We'll probably have to keep an eye for the IPs again as they haven't been blocked, but at least the sock puppet's edits have been reverted and the account has been blocked. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 22:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your well researched and helpful contributions across Wikipedia including Pittsburgh topics! ^{Market St.⧏}_{⧐ Diamond Way} 20:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

As a main editor of Legends, I am calling your attention to Talk:Legend_(disambiguation)#Merger_proposal.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al Schmitt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toto. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foxcatcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Broods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard.biz listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Billboard.biz. Since you had some involvement with the Billboard.biz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. sst✈ 04:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Outsiders (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tribune Studios. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dissolve. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tinderbox Shopping Cart.png

The file File:Tinderbox Shopping Cart.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, unlikely to be useful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dissolve. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dissolve. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dissolve. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heebie Jeebies (2005 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heebie Jeebies (2005 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heebie Jeebies (2005 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 20:53, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heebie-jeebies (idiom) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heebie-jeebies (idiom) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heebie-jeebies (idiom) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Chevvin 19:43, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Trending topics" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trending topics. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Trending topics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

admin help

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I’ve been locked out of this account trying to recover from a data breach (changing every password I use to a new autogenerated one). I’ve tried doing a password reset using the username, the associated email & both, but I get no email response. Perhaps this account was compromised: it should be associated with the email dissolva@gmail.com. If it still is, then I’m not getting emails from the system. I’ve checked that gmail account & every folder in it, but nothing from Wikipedia. I’d appreciate any help in this matter, as I’d hate to lose an account with this much history. Thanks.

--67.43.110.34 (talk) 18:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC) 67.43.110.34 (talk) 18:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's no way for us to tell that you are who you say you are. There is no e-mail associated with this account.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well you could use the tools to see the majority of my edits are from this same IP block: 67.43.110.* My record in the database must have gotten corrupted when the password got changed. Oh well if this account is burnt I guess that’s my official exit from the Wikipedia project. 67.43.110.34 (talk) 23:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC) 67.43.110.34 (talk) 23:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what "tools" you mean. It's possible that a WP:CheckUser could see something, but even if they were willing to do so and they could confirm some of what you say, I don't see how that would get your account back.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:45, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know what I vaguely remember maybe I removed my email years ago over privacy concerns. Well I do appreciate the help. It’s funny I had to rapidly change like 186 passwords after the breach but the only one I got burnt on was Wikipedia. Haha. Open source YGWYPF 67.43.110.34 (talk) 23:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC) 67.43.110.34 (talk) 23:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Seven (Enuff Z'nuff album))" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Seven (Enuff Z'nuff album)) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 2#Seven (Enuff Z'nuff album)) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]