Talk:National Unity Democratic Organisation

Africa: Namibia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Namibia (assessed as High-importance).

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 29 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved as consensus to not move has been established. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 02:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

National Unity Democratic Organisation → National Unity Democratic Organization – With both spelling variants, "organisation" as well as "organization", being prevalent in Namibian society, this particular organization itself uses the "z" spelling. WP:RETAIN isn't applicable here, as the spelling of the organization's actual name isn't at the discretion of this article's editors, so a matter of empirical evidence rather than convention. PanchoS (talk) 10:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 06:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The party writes its own name with 's' check the logo here, the Electoral Commission of Namibia writes it with an 's' [1], and the first spelling with 'z' in this search appears on page 2. --Pgallert (talk) 18:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Even on the 2009 Manifesto you quote, the table of contents is headlined with the 's' spelling, and so are 7 other pages. --Pgallert (talk) 18:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per conflicting evidence, and the evidence most directly from the organi[z|s]ation being with s not z. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 09:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose As already pointed out, this party, as a matter of fact, uses the "organisation" spelling. The very document the proponent cites uses the "organisation" spelling 51 times and the "organization" spelling 2 times. AusLondonder (talk) 17:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Unity Democratic Organisation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]