Talk:National Energy Board

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Energy Board article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency on 28 August 2019. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Abandoned; proposal initiator realized two agencies weren't being merged, but rather renamed; thus, page moves will be recommended and/or done.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Energy Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Merger proposal abandoned when I realized that the two agencies weren't being merged together, but rather, the two agencies were renamed^[1]

References

^ Nyland, Jennifer (16 August 2019). "Canada: Impact Assessment Act And Canadian Energy Regulator Act Coming Into Force August 28, 2019". Mondaq, Limited. Lawson Lundell LLP.

. Doug Mehus (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency into National Energy Board, which would be renamed Canadian Energy Regulator, consistent with WP:CommonName and in accordance with Wikipedia:Merging, particularly in light of news today that the combined federal agency, the Canadian Energy Regulator^[1] officially came in to being as of today's date and was given statutory effect. Doug Mehus (talk) 15:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Canadian Energy Regulator". Retrieved 28 August 2019.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 28 August 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is no consensus for this requested move. (closed by non-admin page mover) qedk (t 桜 c) 07:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was proposed in this section that National Energy Board be renamed and moved to Canadian Energy Regulator.

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

Links: current log • target log

This is Template:Requested move/end

National Energy Board → Canadian Energy Regulator – Following the coming into force of the applicable statute that saw the Canadian Energy Regulator replace the National Energy Board, on the advice of Brad, I opted to pursue a WP:RM#CM discussion to decide on the best name to use. On WP:ON, this seems appropriate. Additionally, the WP:ON is likely to be the commonly used name. On the other hand, we may want to keep this page, coding it as defunct, and then creating a stub for the new Canadian Energy Regulator. Doug Mehus (talk) 17:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now. No evidence has been presented that "Canadian Energy Regulator" is the WP:COMMONNAME - only speculation that it's "likely to be" (eventually?). Based on a brief news search, it seems like this is too soon. Very recent RS articles often uses both names (noting the recent name change). Some sources still just use the old name (example). Let's wait a bit until it's clear that the common name has changed. There's WP:NODEADLINE. Colin M (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Current title is too generic. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin M and WP:NAMECHANGES. If evidence is later shown that the name has really changed in common usage then we can make the move then, but no need for now. — Amakuru (talk) 15:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

[1] Nyland, Jennifer (16 August 2019). "Canada: Impact Assessment Act And Canadian Energy Regulator Act Coming Into Force August 28, 2019". Mondaq, Limited. Lawson Lundell LLP.

[cer-ref-2] "Canadian Energy Regulator". Retrieved 28 August 2019.

[1]

[1]