Talk:Nation of Domination

	Nation of Domination is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please do not post inflammatory comments. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thomas Yen 00:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Thomasyen[reply]

USWA branch wasn't before the WWF branch

It was more a splinter spinoff. The WWF version started with Farooq, then PG-13, who were in both, started up the the USWA branch.99.149.166.148 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Rewriting and resourcing needed

There's fancruft, original research and possibly some completely inaccuracies (see comment above) in the article. Some of the sources are total crap. I don't have time to do this myself right now but I'll look into it in the next couple of days, time permitting. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 05:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just started reading this article, and what you're saying is still true 3 years later. Feedback ^☎ 11:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 17:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Nation of Domination → Nation of Domination – This is something of a test case. I thought it would be straightforward and uncontroversial, until I noticed that many members of Category:WWE teams and stables have titles including "The". I haven't reviewed other articles, but certainly this topic doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria at WP:THE. Also, "The" is omitted in the infobox, and the group is referred to by the abbreviation NOD, not TNOD. Am I overlooking something? --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 22:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC) --BDD (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"the nation of domination" AND ("World Wrestling Federation" OR WWF) gets to "Page 13 of about 125 results"

"nation of domination" AND ("World Wrestling Federation" OR WWF) gets to "Page 18 of 176 results"

My only opinion would be that a ".. (WWF)" or similar suffix would assist navigation and recognition. Greg Kaye 10:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It existed in both the WWF and USWA, so specifying one promotion wouldn't work. It would also be unnecessary to add a qualifier, as there is no other group with the same name (see WP:QUALIFIER). GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move. When they came to the Ring they were not "Nation" but "the Nation" and does NOT fail the WP:THE thingamabob they are a Sports (entertainment) team after all. MPJ -US
-and why do a separate article on a team that "never got off the ground"? That is straight from the article? They were a footnote at best. MPJ -US 17:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I agree with BDD, this should be straightforward application of WP:THE. Just read over the article and the definite article is never capitalised except at the beginning of a sentence. The same goes for the vast majority of sources. Jenks24 (talk) 14:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:THE. This seems pretty straightforward, and the others should be moved too.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. It doesn't meet WP:THE, since it is written without the capitalized article in some of the reference texts. kennethaw88 • talk 03:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Khestwol (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.