Talk:Mushihimesama Futari

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

"CAVE 15th Anniversary ~Shoot'em All!!~". Monthly Arcadia (in Japanese). No. 118. Enterbrain. March 2010. pp. 46–55. (Translation by Shmuplations. Archived 2019-09-14 at the Wayback Machine).
"Dossier Shoot 'em up". IG Magazine [fr] (in French). No. 8. Ankama Presse. May–June 2010. (Translation by Gaming.moe. Archived 2019-02-13 at the Wayback Machine).
浅田誠 (in Japanese). Cave. 24 August 2010. pp. 169–171. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (Translation by Shmuplations. Archived 2020-11-01 at the Wayback Machine).
インタビュー - : 並木学 (in Japanese). Cave. 24 August 2010. pp. 176–179. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (Translation by Shmuplations. Archived 2020-11-17 at the Wayback Machine).
市村崇志 (in Japanese). Cave. 24 August 2010. pp. 180–182. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (Translation by Shmuplations. Archived 2020-01-02 at the Wayback Machine).
野村秀樹 (in Japanese). Cave. 24 August 2010. pp. 191–194. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (Translation by Shmuplations. Archived 2020-11-05 at the Wayback Machine).
池田恒基 (in Japanese). Cave. 24 August 2010. pp. 199–202. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (Translation by Shmuplations. Archived 2020-10-28 at the Wayback Machine).
ボーナス！ケイブ事実！ - 虫姫さまふたり (in Japanese). Cave. 24 August 2010. pp. 203–224. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (Translation by Shmuplations. Archived 2019-12-30 at the Wayback Machine).
GERTRACK! (17 October 2010). "Geki On! > Shooting Game Music & Shooting Game Video ARCHIVE: 【ゲーム音楽】ベイシスケイプ作曲家インタビュー". Shooting Gameside (in Japanese). Vol. 1. Micro Magazine. pp. 88–95. ISBN 978-4896373486. (Translation by Shmuplations. Archived 2019-09-14 at the Wayback Machine).
Greening, Chris (10 May 2011). "Manabu Namiki Interview: Redefining Shooting Soundtracks". Video Game Music Online. Archived from the original on 2020-12-08. Retrieved 2021-01-26.
Joscelyne, Svend (8 December 2011). "Interviews// All Your Base: Cave CCO Tsuneki Ikeda". SPOnG. SPOnG.com Limited. p. 1. Archived from the original on 3 October 2017. Retrieved 2020-12-30.
https://archive.org/details/arcadia080/page/n103/mode/2up

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. See also Talk:CAVE (company)#Consensus on the correct spelling of Dodonpachi. Andrewa (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mushihime-sama Futari → Mushihimesama Futari – On the CAVE talk page, it has been decided to remove the hyphens from all titles in order to avoid confusion and remain consistent with the official spelling of the games. --Relisted. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC) Jotamide (talk) 20:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question - If there is already consensus for this, why does it need an RM? ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably to make sure it isn't a LOCALCONSENSUS... it's not a bad thing to discuss it. -- 70.24.244.161 (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't recall seeing a consensus for this. Anyways, I submitted the request due to this being the spelling used by the developer for official purposes. Jotamide (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sources

(diff) What does assuming good faith have to do with there being a lack of sources? We assume good faith that editors mean well when they make contributions—it doesn't apply to blind belief that things exist when no one asserts proof. If you have reviews of this game, feel free to post them. Otherwise, it hasn't received sufficient coverage to warrant its own page and can be safely merged into Cave's article or a subsidiary. I imagine many other Cave games without reviews would also stand to merge. czar 14:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of review from official channel does not equate to non notability? There were coverage on other aspect like gameplay, development, etc. I suggest letting the community decide whether to merge or keep the article. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠ ^(Talk) 18:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]