A fact from Moose cavalry appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Hi Eddie891, good find. Because of how widespread the hoax seems to have become I am sceptical of any post-2010 information unless it is from very reliable sources. I see the information in that article was added in 2006, I also found a 2004 BBC article that mentions similar themes ("It all started in the late 1930s when Stalin thought elk could replace horses in cavalry regiments based in the north") but only as a quote from the farm manager. There may very well be a kernel of truth in there somewhere (or at least a widespread confusion between the moose domestication project and their potential use in the military). I will add a little to the article to explain this and link to Kostroma - Dumelow (talk) 06:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]