Talk:Millennium Point, Birmingham

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birmingham High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Events

Feel free to expand upon this - I have only added brief details and a link for the 2009 stampede... Willdow (talk) 11:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Trinity Arts And Mieda Collage

Is "Holy Trinity Arts And Mieda Collage" a misspelling of something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.25.237 (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Birmingham Millennium Point incident

Perhaps this incident can be spun off into a new article. If there are no objections, I will do it. Epic Genius (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like user:Millenniumpoint has sanitized the article of any mentions of (or links to) the stampede incident. I'm a Wikipedia newbie, so I'm not sure what the procedure is on this. I figured I'd raise to everyone's attention, with the hope that someone more knowledgeable than I am can take action. Keserian (talk) 00:56, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created a new separate article for the incident, and reinstated brief text for it here with a link, as well as the original version of the facade problems. However, given that there seems to have been some potential conflict of interest with the past edits by "Millennium", a more thorough combing through the edit history might be prudent to remove POV / promotional content and restore a more encyclopedic tone. Shorn again (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Millennium Point (Birmingham). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110525181435/http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/GenerateContent?CONTENT_ITEM_ID=143498&CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE=4&MENU_ID=0 to http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/GenerateContent?CONTENT_ITEM_ID=143498&CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE=4&MENU_ID=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]