Jump to content

Talk:Michael Jackson/Archive 41

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 35Archive 39Archive 40Archive 41

Add title list including "controversies"

I think it is a REQUIREMENT to be able to see if a famous person, or company has "controversies" when reading Wikipedia title list up front! 50.220.95.37 (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

There is no such requirement. His personal life has two sections with abuse allegations in title, and his death also has one. Duplicated the content from those 3 sections into a controversies section wouldn't make sense, if you are suggestion to move it from there to a separate controversy section, then there would need to have a consensus to do so. I think it is fine the way it is, and as a featured article, I believe previous editors preferred this format as is. Also see WP:CRITS which advises against this. WikiVirusC(talk) 21:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Change Lead Section?

I have suggested changes to the lead. This one:

Michael Joseph Jackson (August 29, 1958 – June 25, 2009) was an American singer, songwriter, dancer, and philanthropist. Dubbed the "King of Pop", he is regarded as one of the most significant cultural figures of the 20th century. Over a four-decade career, his contributions to music, dance, and fashion, along with his publicized personal life, made him a global figure in popular culture. Jackson influenced artists across many music genres; through stage and video performances, he popularized complicated dance moves such as the moonwalk, to which he gave the name, as well as the robot.

should become...

Michael Joseph Jackson (August 29, 1958 – June 25, 2009) was an American singer, songwriter, dancer, and philanthropist. Known as the "King of Pop", he is regarded as one of the most significant cultural icons of the 20th century. In a four-decade career, his contributions to music, dance, and fashion, along with his publicized personal life, has made him a global figure in popular culture. Jackson influenced artists across many music genres; through stage and video performances, he popularized complicated dance moves such as the moonwalk, to which he gave the name, as well as the robot.

Changes are marked in bold. What do you think? RMXY (talk) 11:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

While using "icons" here feels like puffery, I have no qualms with the other proposed changes. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 11:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Alright. I fixed the lead, except that I didn't change "figures" to "icons". RMXY (talk) 23:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This wasn't a good change. Both "has" and "had" (as the lead had it before I changed it) are grammatically wrong here. I've restored it to use the simple past (no "has" or "had"). Popcornfud (talk) 10:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Oh, but I should add that changing "dubbed" to the more plain-English "known as" is definitely an improvement — "dubbed" is a silly journalese word. Popcornfud (talk) 11:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Conversion to Islam

In November 2008, The Sun and reported that Jackson officially converted to Islam and held a ceremony in a friend's mansion is Los Angeles where he wore an Islamic garb and an Imam's hat to pledge allegiance to the new religion. Daily Mail also published an article titled Michael Jackson 'becomes a Muslim and changes name to Mikaeel'. Times Of India, The Economic Times and India today have also reported his conversion (Michael Jackson has converted to Islam: Report, Michael Jackson converts to Islam and Michael Jackson to be buried in Muslim tradition: Report). Luban the truth (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

See FAQ #1 at the top of this talk page. This is a non event that can be traced back to poor quality tabloid sourcing, so it is unsuitable for adding to the article.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Given the abundance of sources, it's crucial that this subject is included in the article; otherwise, the world will only have insufficient knowledge about Michael.

(his sister later converted to Islam): https://www.hindustantimes.com/music/janet-jackson-is-now-muslim-10-celebrities-you-didn-t-know-converted-to-islam/story-1F2zVgZ1nnEevX4OkDWeLK.html

Source Links: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1088225/Michael-Jackson-Muslim-changes-Mikaeel.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/michael-jackson/5684999/Michael-Jackson-was-he-influenced-by-the-Nation-of-Islam.html#:~:text=Jackson%20reportedly%20converted%20to%20Islam%20and%20changed%20his%20name%20to%20Mikaeel%20in%202008%2C%20although%20he%20never%20talked%20publicly%20about%20his%20faith.

https://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2010%2F01%2F21%2F98036#:~:text=In%20November%202008%2C%20The%20Sun,allegiance%20to%20the%20new%20religion.

https://dailypost.ng/2017/04/04/converted-islam-michael-jacksons-brother-jermaine/

https://m.economictimes.com/michael-jackson/michael-jackson-to-be-buried-in-muslim-tradition-report/articleshow/4727761.cms

https://www.indiatoday.in/latest-headlines/story/michael-jackson-converts-to-islam-33787-2008-11-21

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/michael-jackson-has-converted-to-islam-report/articleshow/3740517.cms

https://www.arabianbusiness.com/industries/industries-culture-society/michael-jackson-converts-islam-report-82408 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luban the truth (talkcontribs) 18:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


This is classic churnalism. The sources here aren't saying anything new, they are simply repeating what The Sun (United Kingdom) said in the story with the headline "The Way You Mecca Me Feel" in November 2008.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Infobox Image

I believe there should be a new infobox image of him. The one that is used currently would be a better fit for a specific section of the article. There are plenty of images of him with the appropriate license that are not only in colour but also depict his face better and show him performing live at the height of his glory that represent him as a global icon Bryantriplex (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

See Talk:Michael_Jackson/Archive_40#Change_infobox_photo. The most recent discussion did not produce a strong consensus for a change.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:25, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
I think this image would be great. It's Michael Jackson at his peak preforming during the Victory Tour. 2601:5C2:4380:7310:913A:2C4B:35CB:4EE7 (talk) 02:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
The image above on Twitter would be copyrighted. Due to WP:NFCC, the infobox image has to be one that is on Wikimedia Commons as it it free to use.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
How about this image? 83.53.193.221 (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
This has been used as the infobox image in the dim and distant past. I think it's OK, but the consensus seems to be for one of him performing.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
And how about the enhaced version of the current one? 83.53.75.73 (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The enhanced version has too much noise reduction applied to it. This has reduced the graininess of the original image at the expense of reducing the detail.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Ok 83.52.76.135 (talk) 07:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Michael Jackson’s middle name

The article states that Michael’s middle name was “Joseph”; however, in the vast majority of personal/legal documents (passports, driver’s licenses, birth certificate, court transcripts, etc.), continuously list his middle name as being “Joe”, not “Joseph”. Many members of Michael’s family, such as Jermaine in his book You Are Not Alone, have stated that his middle name was again, Joe, and Jermaine refers to the rumour that Michael’s middle name was Joseph as a “myth”. It seems that although “Joe” was his legal middle name, Michael often liked to use “Joseph” whenever he had to mention his full name (as he does in his Will and during court appearances); nonetheless, I suggest that his full name be changed to “Michael Joe Jackson”. Gluepix (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

To my knowledge, "Joe" was part of an alternate name he used for various things while "Joseph" was his formal middle name, though I could be mistaken. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 11:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
It’s the opposite, Joseph was the variant he’d use in various situations, while Joe was his formal middle name; again, “Joe” is what appears in his birth certificate and the vast majority of other personal/legal documents mentioning his full name. Gluepix (talk) 01:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Conspiracy theory junk ....Michael Joseph Jackson is dead and Michael Joe Jackson is alive," will be the next thing claimed.
And a third suggested: "Michael Joseph Jackson must be the double of the real King." Moxy- 02:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Are you on crack, my guy? I’m just saying that his middle name was actually Joe. There’s so much evidence backing that up that if I shared it all, I’d end up flooding the talk page. Gluepix (talk) 19:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Neveling, Andre (2020-06-25). "Is Michael Jackson alive? How bizarre conspiracy theories, Jackson family dramas and daughter Paris continue to make headlines 11 years after MJ's death". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2023-06-16. Moxy- 23:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
I think it should be changed to Joe as well. According to a tweet from LaToya, (which I could not find at the moment), she claimed that his middle name was Joe and the reason for that was to disassociate him from his father, Joseph. Mashpotatofries29 (talk) 00:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Posthumous allegations should be mentioned in the lead

This article's lead has been downplaying the significance of the posthumous allegations against Jackson by solely mentioning the investigations and trial from the late 90s to mid 2000s. It should at least be mentioned that it gained intense public interest and received mixed reactions from the public, as this is still a topic frequently discussed today in regards to Jackson and his career. TheXuitts (talk) 18:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Leads can only be so long. Abuse allegations are already mentioned. The posthumous allegations seem like they are part of the detailed continuation of that rather than a separate topic that deserves separate lead space. Barnards.tar.gz (talk) 18:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
I would oppose padding the lede (yes, lede) with such content. The posthumous allegations are already substantially shakier than the lifetime allegations for which legal proceedings found an absence of liability/guilt. We would have to go beyond documenting them to documenting their failure to sway the courts and the public, which would swell the lede even further. BD2412 T 18:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Just as other have stated, the lead is already long enough and his allegations has already been mentioned thoroughly in the lead. Alessiorom13 (talk) 12:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no significance. The allegations downplay themselves in my opinion. There was already a consensus on this and nothing since that consensus has changed. TruthGuardians (talk) 13:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 July 2023

Under "death" in the 2nd paragraph it says "Jackson was administered propofol, lorazepam, and midazolam;" That appears to say that the paramedics administered that. It should say "Jackson had been administered..." 23.240.140.73 (talk) 17:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

 DoneJonesey95 (talk) 20:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 July 2023

i would like to edit this master pieces to add more information for educational reasons 2A02:C7C:6A66:4E00:B8EA:6CAC:E8EA:2C8E (talk) 19:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 August 2023

Michael’s middle name is Joe as confirmed by various family members. Joe is the middle name on all of his legal documents, etc… 2603:7000:7907:B570:B055:C7F2:4B9D:E204 (talk) 05:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. We have sources showing "Joseph". Meters (talk) 05:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

TV Concert Broadcasts

Could something be added on the page about Michael's television concert events. For starters, Japan Tour '87 (1987 broadcast in Japan of the September 26, 1987 show in Yokohama), Live In Concert In Bucharest: The Dangerous Tour (1992 worldwide broadcast of the Bucharest show on October 1, 1992, which was released on DVD in 2005), HIStory: Live In Bucharest: 1996 (1996 broadcast in Romania of the performance in Bucharest),HIStory: Live In Kuala Lumpur 1996 (TV1000 broadcast of the October 29, 1996 concert), Live In Auckland (1996 Zew Zealand broadcast of the November 11, concert (Notable for being the last known recording of "Come Together" / "D.S." medley live)), HIStory Live (1997 worldwide broadcast and canceled DVD release of the July 6, 1997 show in Munich, Germany), Live In Gothenburg 1997 (1997 Swedish broadcast of the show in Gothenburg by TV1000), Michael Jackson: 30th Anniversary Celebration (2001-2002 broadcasts of Michael Jackson's 30th Anniversary Celebration in New York City), HIStory: Live In Tunis 1996 (2010 broadcast that aired in Tunisia).

This is just an idea and might be to much to ask for but it's worth asking about. 2601:481:8600:5260:D193:A99E:6A70:D04 (talk) 06:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 September 2023

"... was viewed by more than an estimated 2.5 billion people globally" does not read correctly. Suggest that this is changed to e.g. "... was estimated to have been viewed by more than 2.5 billion people globally", or any other logical wording that editors prefer. 2A00:23C8:7B09:FA01:C190:26E8:7937:4CD0 (talk) 12:26, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done Good idea. Popcornfud (talk) 13:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 August 2023

Add this to the end of the 1st paragraph of #Life and career:

Michael and his siblings were raised as Jehovah's Witnesses. He remained committed to his faith into adulthood.[1][2][3]

 Not done: This is already mentioned in the article. In § Early life and the Jackson 5, "[Katherine Esther Jackson] was a Jehovah's Witness.", and in § Increased tabloid speculation, "In 1987, Jackson disassociated himself from the Jehovah's Witnesses." TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

@TechnoSquirrel69:

§ Early Life only mentions his mom being a Jehovah's Witness, not Michael and his siblings. I also want to correct the other section. The claims of him disassociating himself from the religion were based on unconfirmed reports and were likely false. It would be worth mentioning since he never said it himself. "Jackson reportedly remained a practicing Jehovah’s Witness into adulthood, but unconfirmed reports claimed he left the religion during the late 1980s." -source In the Beliefnet article, Michael said himself that he remained religious his whole life as well as during parenthood. He continued doing missionary work until 1991 (because he had a tour) and never mentioned leaving in 1987. In 2001, he confirmed he was still a JW.[3] In 2007, he thanked Jehovah for his writing.[4]
To reflect this information, can changes be made to § Increased tabloid speculation:
(The last line is unclear whether he denounced the religion or the video. He denounced the video. I'm also not sure if the last 2 lines should be mentioned at all, since it's not confirmed that he left.)
In 1987, Jackson disassociated himself from the Jehovah's Witnesses.[135] Katherine Jackson said this might have been because some Witnesses strongly opposed the Thriller video.[136] Michael had denounced it in a Witness publication in 1984.[137]
to
Jackson remained a practicing Jehovah's Witness during his life despite unconfirmed reports in 1987 claiming he disassociated himself. In a Beliefnet article, he stated he continued doing missionary work up to 1991.[5][1] In a 2001 TV Guide interview, he confirmed he was still a Jehovah's Witness.[3] Katherine Jackson believed he left because some Witnesses strongly opposed the Thriller video.[136] Michael had denounced the video in a Witness publication in 1984.[137] Squaredtrig (talk) 21:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
This has languished for weeks and is not implementable due to an unresolved objection. Deactivating edit request. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:22, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I was instructed to make a new post, which I did a few days ago on September 26. technosquirrel did not reply back to my comment, but I didn't see an objection? Squaredtrig (talk) 02:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ a b Jackson, Michael (December 2000). "My Childhood, My Sabbath, My Freedom". Beliefnet. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Sundays were my day for "Pioneering," the term used for the missionary work that Jehovah's Witnesses do. [...] I continued my pioneering work for years and years after my career had been launched. [...] When I was young, my whole family attended church together in Indiana. As we grew older, this became difficult, [...] I was comforted by the belief that God exists in my heart, and in music and in beauty, not only in a building. But I still miss the sense of community that I felt there--I miss the friends and the people who treated me like I was simply one of them. Simply human. Sharing a day with God.
  2. ^ Waldman, Steven (July 6, 2009). "Michael Jackson on Religion, Celebrating the Sabbath and His Lost Childhood". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 26, 2023. Raised as a Jehovah's Witness, [...] he attended Church each Sunday and mourned the loss of his ability to do that.
  3. ^ a b c "The Man in the Mirror". TV Guide Magazine. November 10–16, 2001. p. 20. TVG: How did you avoid self-destruction? MJ [Michael Jackson]: I think religion entered in? TVG: Are you still a Jehovah's Witness? MJ: Yeah.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  4. ^ "Michael: 25 Years After Thriller". Ebony Magazine. December 2007. p. 98. When I write something that I know is right, I get on my knees and say thank you. Thank you Jehovah!
  5. ^ "Michael Jackson's Spiritual Journey". Indianapolis Recorder. July 8, 2009. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Jackson reportedly remained a practicing Jehovah's Witness during his life, but unconfirmed reports claimed he left the religion during the late 1980s.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 October 2023

There should be an update to the Death#Posthumous child sexual abuse allegations section.

At the end of the second paragraph, the following should be added:

"In 2020, a state law passed in California which granted plaintiffs in child sex abuse cases an additional period to file lawsuits. In October 2020 and again in April 2021, the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled that MJJ Productions Inc. and MJJ Ventures Inc. employees were not legally obligated to protect the two men from Jackson. In August 2023, California’s Second District Court of Appeal overturned the ruling, and the case was approved to move forward to trial court."

With the following citation:

More citations if deemed necessary:

Luiysia (talk) 14:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 22:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 September 2023

In #Life and career under §Early life and the Jackson 5 (1958–1975), add this to the end of the 1st paragraph:

Michael and his siblings were raised as Jehovah's Witnesses. He remained committed to his faith into adulthood.[1][2][3]

And also in #Life and career under §Increased tabloid speculation (1986–1987) in the last paragraph, change:

In 1987, Jackson disassociated himself from the Jehovah's Witnesses.[135] Katherine Jackson said this might have been because some Witnesses strongly opposed the Thriller video.[136] Michael had denounced it in a Witness publication in 1984.[137]
to
Jackson remained a practicing Jehovah's Witness during his life despite unconfirmed reports in 1987 claiming he disassociated himself. In a Beliefnet article, he stated he continued doing missionary work up to 1991.[4][1] In a 2001 TV Guide interview, he confirmed he was still a Jehovah's Witness.[3] Katherine Jackson believed he left because some Witnesses strongly opposed the Thriller video.[136] Michael had denounced the video in a Witness publication in 1984.[137]

Reasoning:

§Early Life: Only mentions his mom being a Jehovah's Witness, not Michael and his siblings.

§Increased tabloid speculation: The claims of him disassociating himself from the religion were based on unconfirmed reports and were likely false. It should be mentioned since he never said it himself. "Jackson reportedly remained a practicing Jehovah’s Witness into adulthood, but unconfirmed reports claimed he left the religion during the late 1980s." -source In the Beliefnet article, Michael said himself that he remained religious his whole life as well as during parenthood. He continued doing missionary work until 1991 (because he had a tour) and never mentioned leaving in 1987. In a 2001 interview with TV Guide Magazine, he confirmed he was still a JW. Here is the full quote: TVG: How did you avoid self-destruction? MJ [Michael Jackson]: I think religion entered in? TVG: Are you still a Jehovah's Witness? MJ: Yeah.[3] In 2007, he thanked Jehovah for his writing.[5]

I think it's a bit tricky, because one can remain religious, and remain a Christian specifically, and thank Jehovah, without actively belonging to a specific denomination. BD2412 T 04:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
@BD2412: In a 2001 interview with TV Guide Magazine, he clearly stated he was a Jehovah's Witness. To quote: "TVG: Are you still a Jehovah's Witness? Michael Jackson: Yeah.[3] His Wikipedia page currently states In 1987, Jackson disassociated himself from the Jehovah's Witnesses which should be changed because it was never confirmed that he left. Squaredtrig (talk) 06:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Examining the sources provided by Squaredtrig: the first one doesn't say Jackson remained a Jehovah's Witness. The second one (an essay written by Jackson) was published on Beliefnet, which appears to be a website about faith in general, and Jackson doesn't get specific about which denomination he belongs to at the time of writing.
However, the third source seems pretty unambiguous. I'm not seeing any reason why we couldn't simply keep the current wording and add this at the end: "In 2001, Jackson told an interviewer he was still a Jehovah's Witness."
Regarding the current claim in the article that In 1987, Jackson disassociated himself from the Jehovah's Witnesses, that's cited to an Ebony source which writes: Although he has disassociated himself as one of the religious society's ministers who gives exclusive devotion to Jehovah, I don't actually know what that means — is every Jehovah's Witness a "minister" (ie it means he was no longer a member of the organization), or is that a type of position within the organization? Popcornfud (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
§Early Life request: The TV Guide source says he did remain a JW as an adult. At the very least, I suggest changing to state that Michael and his siblings were raised as JWs rather than their mom.
§Increased tabloid speculation request: The Beliefnet essay was posted in December 2000 so we can deduce that he belonged to the JW because of the 2001 TV Guide source. He did JW pioneering work up to 1991, one wouldn't do this unless they were somewhat still associated. I think that should be mentioned too. The Ebony source about the ministers is ambiguous. I suggest changing to the original request above or to In 1987, Jackson reportedly disassociated himself from the Jehovah's Witnesses. @Popcornfud Squaredtrig (talk) 23:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Deactivating edit request as this is still being discussed and there does not appear to be a specific edit ready to go live right now. Several extended-confirmed users have already participated in the discussion and can implement the change themselves if necessary. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

As I said above, I can't see any reason why we couldn't add "In 2001, Jackson told an interviewer he was still a Jehovah's Witness", as this is supported by a reliable source, so I've added that to the article. As this contradicts the existing statement in the article, that Jackson had disassociated himself from the church, I've also amended that to just say that this is what Ebony reported, rather than keep it in Wikipedia's voice. Popcornfud (talk) 04:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ a b Jackson, Michael (December 2000). "My Childhood, My Sabbath, My Freedom". Beliefnet. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Sundays were my day for "Pioneering," the term used for the missionary work that Jehovah's Witnesses do. [...] I continued my pioneering work for years and years after my career had been launched. [...] When I was young, my whole family attended church together in Indiana. As we grew older, this became difficult, [...] I was comforted by the belief that God exists in my heart, and in music and in beauty, not only in a building. But I still miss the sense of community that I felt there--I miss the friends and the people who treated me like I was simply one of them. Simply human. Sharing a day with God.
  2. ^ Waldman, Steven (July 6, 2009). "Michael Jackson on Religion, Celebrating the Sabbath and His Lost Childhood". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 26, 2023. Raised as a Jehovah's Witness, [...] he attended Church each Sunday and mourned the loss of his ability to do that.
  3. ^ a b c d "The Man in the Mirror". TV Guide Magazine. November 10–16, 2001. p. 20. TVG: How did you avoid self-destruction? MJ [Michael Jackson]: I think religion entered in? TVG: Are you still a Jehovah's Witness? MJ: Yeah.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  4. ^ "Michael Jackson's Spiritual Journey". Indianapolis Recorder. July 8, 2009. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Jackson reportedly remained a practicing Jehovah's Witness during his life, but unconfirmed reports claimed he left the religion during the late 1980s.
  5. ^ "Michael: 25 Years After Thriller". Ebony Magazine. December 2007. p. 98. When I write something that I know is right, I get on my knees and say thank you. Thank you Jehovah!

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 November 2023

Cut out and add some songs, while replacing others. When mentioning specific songs in the life and career section, only use the songs most culturally impactful in the article. The songs that make Michael Jackson “one of the most significant cultural figures of the 20th century”. Examples would be adding more songs from Dangerous like In the Closet, Jam, Will You Be There, and the titular song, mentioning Another Part of Me in the Captain EO section, and cutting out Rockin' Robin and Got to Be There and replacing them with Never Can Say Goodbye and Human Nature, and these are only a few examples. Just so this wiki can be properly used as the definitive resource guide and general information on the King of Pop. Reply back to me after you make these changes and I’ll see if any more specific songs need to be included/excluded. 172.116.32.173 (talk) 04:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

 Not done. Your request is far too vague and is not accompanied by links to reliable sources that verify that the songs you want to add are culturally impactful and that the songs you want to exclude are not culturally impactful. Cullen328 (talk) 04:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 November 2023

Make mention of not just the music videos, but his live television and concert performances. Like add the latter to the sentence about Thriller and add “he continued to innovate with the videos AND live performances for Bad, Dangerous and HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I.” Also cut out Invincible all together since it had only one semi hit single and music video, and only one live performance. 172.116.32.173 (talk) 04:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 December 2023

I would like to redo the page because the lifeline is wrong 101.183.193.4 (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 06:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 december 2023

the sales of mj and his albums are wrong because mj sold one billion records and thriller sold more than 100 million units but in this page it is mentioned only 70 million Aayan v anand (talk) 16:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

 Not done the billion claim has previously been rejected as a dubious inflation, and chances are the same goes for 100M. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Posthumous sales/releases

Regarding this revert:

I think it makes more sense to have the "Posthumous releases" section before the "Posthumous sales" section. This is for three reasons:

  • It's basically sensible — you say what was released, then you say how well it sold.
  • It matches the standard structure of music articles, which put information about a particular release first, then its sales.
  • Most importantly IMO, the Jackson estate is mentioned for the first time in the "Posthumous releases" section, but isn't Wikilinked or explained. The full context for what this isn't given until the start of the "Posthumous sales" section. To me it makes sense to begin the discussion of all posthumous releases (including sales) with an explanation of the entity that handles them.

Popcornfud (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

The posthumous sales section is about how his death impacted his record sales, and it’s mostly about Jacksons’ catalog sales within one year of his death. During this period, only one soundtrack was released posthumously as MJ and its sales are minimal in this one-year sales report which is described in the posthumous sales section. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
We're clearly not going to agree, so I've just gone ahead and wikilinked the Jackson estate on first mention. IMO it should still be linked on the second mention too, because this is the section of the article where it's properly introduced and explained as a concept. Popcornfud (talk) 14:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Native American heritage claims

@User:Jonathan Deamer I was wondering why you feel the category for American people who self-identify as being of Native American descent is "not supported by body text"? Thank you. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 03:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

@Bohemian Baltimore Thanks for reaching out! The only mention of the terms "Native American", "[American] Indian" etc. in the article itself that I could find is the following:
Joe's [MJ's father's] great-grandfather, July "Jack" Gale, was a US Army scout; family lore held that he was also a Native American medicine man.
I didn't feel "family lore" about an ancestor was the same as Jackson self-identifying, which is what the category states.
Please do let me know if I've missed something else in the body text! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 12:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
RE: Family lore
The source does not say ”family lore” – it presents Gale’s ethnicity as fact. Maybe the word ”family lore” should be removed?
Quote: Joe's great-grandfather, July “Jack” Gale, a Native American medicine man and a US Army scout, married a black slave named Gina during the years before the Civil War. 93.160.65.62 (talk) 12:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Well spotted! I can't access the source to verify, but that sounds like a fair change. Once that's made, a category along the lines of "descended from" rather than "self-identifying" would work. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 12:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 January 2024

Change 'Satan' in Associated acts to 'The Jackson 5'. 2600:1700:9050:6990:4C93:EE8C:EA7F:97B9 (talk) 02:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: I'm not finding a 'satan' anywhere in the text. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 03:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Third paragraph in the lead should be trimmed and more accomplishments should be highlighted instead

I find it a bit puzzling that the longest paragraph in the lead is dedicated entirely to baseless allegations, acquittals, settlments and his untimely death. It should be trimmed down so that more of his career accomplishments can be included in the lead instead. After all, many consider this individual the most successful and influential artist of all time. That should be highlighted more than his legal troubles. Instantwatym (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Not sure how much you would opt to trim, but keep in mind the lead's other paragraphs discuss accomplishments, and it would feel like whitewashing to get rid of allegations altogether when they did affect his career (and later led to reclusion after being acquitted). The controversy with Conrad Murray was also quite a big deal when he's been blamed for the death by giving excessive amounts of propofol. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

time to choose another 88' pic?

I love the default picture but don't you think it's time to update with a clear picture of it or another 1988 pic from what is considered his prime? 2603:7000:7907:B570:8C7F:8C6F:C16F:5364 (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes 66.44.243.19 (talk) 00:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

This image [1] is only four years earlier. Just cropped it so feel free to make adjustments. What do you all think? OO 02:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Infobox photo

Can we get another infobox photo? The current one is black and white. I've been thinking of uploading a new photo. Ccole2006 (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Thriller sales

thriller sold 100 million records but in this page it is written only 70 million 2409:40E3:69:C437:BCD6:5260:C92:EB22 (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done 100M has previously been rejected as a dubious inflation. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
The threshold for album sales is the certified amount is at least 30% of the claimed sales. If sales were certified up to 70 million, then it would be reasonable to add back the 100 million. But as of right now since Sony has yet to provide the certifications or means for how they came up with that figure, so even most fans chock it up as inflated Never17 (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Worldwide sales

The worldwide sales for Michael Jackson need to changed from 400 million to 500 million, to reflect the list of best selling artists page. As a consensus was already reached that he was long past the time for the figure to be updated Never17 (talk) 22:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done I have recently made some minor improvements to the article, including the update of that figure, as well as fixing some references that lacked the authors' names. Salvabl (talk) 22:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Great work as always Never17 (talk) 22:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Errors in references to The Mercury News

Hello. There are two references to The Mercury News in this article. One is from 1988 and the other from 2010. The name of the newspaper in those years wasn't "The Mercury News", but "The San Jose Mercury News", so its name should be changed in the references. And one title has another error: the abbreviation for the United States should be capitalized. KamilaF89 (talk) 01:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 March 2024

MissGoldLover (talk) 20:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Could we add that Michael was born at St Mary Mercy Hospital in Gary (source: Katherine's Book). It hasn't existed since 1995.
 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 14:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Forbes List of Highest Paid Dead Celebrities Error

It says that Michael topped the list from 2013-2023, but he was placed 3rd in 2021 and 6th in 2022, according to Forbes.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/abigailfreeman/2021/10/30/the-highest-paid-dead-celebrities-2021/?sh=237eb8783839

https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisettevoytko/2022/10/31/the-highest-paid-dead-celebrities-of-2022-a-writer-earns-half-a-billion-from-the-great-beyond/?sh=6f61cae22bb3 206.223.171.76 (talk) 23:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

2+ 2A00:23C8:A69E:C301:DC0D:77E0:EAB:BA3D (talk) 13:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Lead section concern (again)

Hello. I noticed the nickname "King of Pop" is emboldened and not link. Do you think it should be linked to Honorific nicknames in popular music without being in bold face? Other singer article FAs like Mariah Carey, Regine Velasquez, and Kyla are linked to the aforementioned list of nicknames in music without being in bold text. What can you say? ScarletViolet (tc) 12:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

From what I saw in a previous edit summary, the lack of a link is because "King of Pop" already redirects to this page. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 May 2024

Remove the red links of Big News Network in 95 reference and Brittany Spanos in 182 reference! 2804:1B3:9601:37FD:A599:29E6:5980:1205 (talk) 01:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done thanks for pointing those out, especially when both pages have been deleted. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the image of MJ

Why is the main image of him in black and white? I think it would be cooler to have an image of him in color on the top of the article, as long as it's freely licensed. Zakawer (talk) 01:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't remember what led to the current image used, but if you have any particular suggestions on what else to use for the infobox, then please list them here. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
His most famous looks are
Smooth Criminal (1988)
History Era w/Black Fedora Hat (1996-98)
Black or White (1991)
Thriller (1984)
Bad (1987)
American Music Awards (1984)
In the Closet (1993)
Dangerous Tour (1993)
Short Hair (1995)
Billie Jean (1982)
So any of these would do Never17 (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
These are copyrighted and not suitable for WP:NFCC as there are various free to use images of Jackson on Wikimedia Commons. There have been numerous debates about this and I'm not the greatest fan of the 1988 image, but it does have a consensus.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Yeah it's tough because the estate copyrights literally any usage of his likeness, it's hard to find a good one we can use. But i was just throwing it out there that one of those would be good if we were to make a change Never17 (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Images we currently have the proper copyright are available for viewing at https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Michael_Jackson .... Is there something there that stands out? Moxy🍁 19:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Of the ones available, this one is easily the most famous (Dangerous Tour 1993). The image is extremely high quality, in color and would be a great picture to use since it's frequently referenced a lot. So my vote is for this Never17 (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 June 2024

This sentence should be re-written in the past tense. It should also be clearer.

Change this: “The executors claim that it was worth about $7 million, the IRS that it was worth over $1.1 billion.”

To this: “The executors claimed that it was worth about $7 million, while the IRS claimed that it was worth over $1.1 billion.” 2600:4040:549B:7300:7027:BCB4:5F36:50E5 (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done the sentence has been revised accordingly. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 April 2024

Change Joseph to Joe.

Michael Jackson's middle name is Joe, not Joseph.

This comes from court documents. Mjsmyidol (talk) 00:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Which document(s) are you referring to? Last I checked, "Joe" was an alternate middle name used while the more formal "Joseph" was his legal name, but either way links would be helpful. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Agreed, Mihchael has verbally stated « Joseph » as his middle name on a few occasions. Chasetruth101 (talk) 16:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Religion/Personal life

Hello. Could anyone tell me if it's appropriate to include Michael's conversion to Islam?[2][3] Thank you Grandia01 (talk) 07:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

See the FAQ at the top of this page. This was dismissed as unreliable a long time ago.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
i don't know how i missed that. thank you Grandia01 (talk) 06:21, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi @TheWikiholic, you've (partially) reverted my edit, but (tbh) I don't see a clear consensus that philanthropist should be included in the first sentence and I'm still confused even though I did read this conversation. Its inclusion is definitely against MOS:ROLEBIO, which says, "In general, a position, activity, or role should not be included in the lead paragraph if: a) the role is not otherwise discussed in the lead (per MOS:LEAD, don't tease the reader) ..." Thedarkknightli (talk) 21:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

I would support removing "philanthropist" per MOS:ROLEBIO as it's not how Jackson is most commonly described by reliable sources and isn't what made him notable. Popcornfud (talk) 21:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the talk discussion that led to the re-addition of "philanthropist" to the lead. It seems there was a consensus there and the descriptor was added soon after.
I will not hide my stance on this issue given that I opened that discussion as a novice Wikipedian. Some of the points presented in that discussion include that the quantity of Jackson's donations was unprecedented for a pop star, to the point that they were recognized by Guinness, and that his philanthropy influenced future pop stars. RyanAl6 (talk) 00:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
We recently discussed this topic in greater detail, as shown here. We have a dedicated article on Jackson's philanthropy. Based on the aforementioned discussion, a summary of his philanthropic activities has been added to the body of this article under the "Philanthropy" section, although it has not yet been summarized in the lead TheWikiholic (talk) 02:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Guys, I would actually be fine with including "philanthropist" if we do summarize his philanthropy in the lead.
Regards, Thedarkknightli (talk) 09:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Agreed. Its unnecessary puffery and something hes widely known for. It. should be removed. Instantwatym (talk) 18:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Michael Jackson is widely regarded as a notable philanthropist and humanitarian. His charity work is unprecedented, and his message of world peace is well known. [1] I vote for keeping the term "philanthropist" in the lede. Israell (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
It's not among the things he's most notable for though, and that sohuld be our guiding principle per MOS:ROLEBIO. Popcornfud (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
If Jackson's philanthropic actions had been anecdotal, then there would not be an article about his philanthropy. That philanthropy is even linked to places associated with Jackson, such as the Neverland Ranch or works (albums, songs like "We Are The World", "Gone Too Soon"...). Salvabl (talk) 19:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Also, in the year 2000, Guinness World Records honoured Michael Jackson for supporting 39 charities, more than any other entertainer, and Michael donated over 500M to charity throughout his career. Israell (talk) 20:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I didn't say it was anecdotal, or non-notable. I'm saying it isn't one of the things he's most notable for. It probably isn't even in the top 3 (This is a high bar — MJ is one of the most notable people ever to exist.) Popcornfud (talk) 20:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I disagree for the aforesaid reasons. The very existence of Neverland makes it one of the things he's most notable for. Israell (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Perhaps one way to test this is to see what obituaries wrote about Jackson shortly after his death. Here are the first handful of reliable sources I came across: Guardian, NME,NYT, LA Times , Economist, Uncut, Times, Rolling Stone.
An initial scan through each of them don't reveal any mention of his philanthropic work. This suggests to me that it wasn't one of the things Jackson was most notable for, and therefore listing it in the lead sentence may be WP:UNDUE and not meet the requirements of WP:ROLEBIO, which have been stated above.
We can't make decisions about notability based on what Wikipedia pages exist, because Wikipedia obviously can't be used to indicate notability. (I mean, we also have a page on Bubbles the chimpanzee — should we mention him in the lead sentence too?) We can't make decisions about notability based on whether Neverland (or anything else) exists, because Wikipedia is based on reliable secondary sources. Popcornfud (talk) 20:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Neverland Ranch is perhaps the worst example anyone can point to about his supposed Philanthrophy. That Ranch is associated with most (if not all) of his pedophilia and child sex abuse allegations, including one related to an upcoming trial which is pending a date. If guilt is established at the most recent trial (for alleged crimes prior to his death), would we still include his ranch activities under philanthrophy? It would asinine to do so. Notability is what most people (the general public, not die hard fans) associate with an individual. Philanthropy is really pushing it and its not something he is widely known for. And some of his "philanthrophic" activities such as the ranch are questionable at best, and perhaps even criminal. Instantwatym (talk) 21:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Jackson was proven innocent and there was no evidence ever found that he was guilty of any crime. Was he weird? Yes, he's one of the most famous people ever and his circumstances his entire life was abnormal. Most people do not care about these false accusations and the average person living in Africa, Europe, Latin America or islands in the middle of nowhere listening to him have never heard of them.
His few "accusers" were people who went on record defending him and then later contradicting their previous testimonies and claiming retroactively abuse happened after being offered money for their stories. "Child Sex abuse accusations against Michael Jackson ruled unfounded after month long investigation". This was the same case he went to court on, during this investigation which followed Living with Michael Jackson he was in Miami Florida during the majority of the period. He met the family in 2000, the accusations claimed that he waited 3 years after meeting them only until he got backlash for the Bashir interview and was under investigation for a crime before actually committing the crime. They changed their story in July of 2003, claiming they were actually being abused by Jackson during the period he was under a criminal investigation. Which is complete nonsense. [4] If that isn't enough the DA who had a clear vendetta literally performed a illegal raid of Jackson's attorney's offices, got a copy of this memo and then retroactively changed the dates of the sexual abuse accusations and added more charges including a conspiracy charge even though Jackson was the only person allegedly involved in the conspiracy. [5][6]
This is pure nonsense and rightfully got thrown out of court. With the Jurors stating on video a few years ago "The Prosecution had no evidence, what little case they had was tainted by the District Attorney" [7] Never17 (talk) 06:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I only brought that up in response to someone saying that one example of his philanthropy is a place linked to most of his child sex abuse allegations. The dispute at hand is whether to define this individual as a philanthrophist in the first line of the lead. I don't think so because his philanthropic activities are something that vast majority of individuals are familiar with. His notability among most people is as a singer, dancer, entertainer, etc.
P.S. Since the allegations were brought up, it is a fact that there is an active case that is proceeding trial. One could argue that it should be mentioned in the 3rd paragraph of the lead, because the way the lead is written currently implies that he has been cleared of any and all wrongdoing and does not have an active case. Instantwatym (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes he settled in 1993 and that fucked him up since even though he was cleared it opened the door for grifters to sell their stories to the media in exchange for cash Never17 (talk) 03:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

While I'm not sure how one can convict or even sue a dead person, it is true that having an article dedicated to something doesn't automatically warrant a mention in the lead, and we shouldn't exclusively follow what fans associate with the guy. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

There are multiple reliable secondary sources discussing Jackson's philanthropy and humanitarian work, as well can see here and here . Numerous sources are also available in non-English languages. This extensive coverage is precisely why Jackson's philanthropic efforts have a standalone article. A standalone article does not necessarily mean it must be included in the lead, but it clearly indicates the significance of his humanitarian contributions.
According to the Guinness Book of World Records, Jackson supported more charities than any other entertainer. Some estimates suggest that he donated over $500 million to charities, which is more than any other entertainer. Additionally, his will stipulates that 20% of his earnings and 20% of his assets are allocated to charity. His estate is currently worth more than $2 billion, further establishing Jackson as one of the most prolific philanthropist and humanitarian in history.
According to WP:ROLEBIO, a position, activity, or role should generally not be included in the lead paragraph if it is not otherwise discussed in the lead.
And here we have the 2019 version of the articles lead states: "He traveled the world attending events honoring his humanitarianism, and, in 2000, Guinness World Records recognized him for supporting 39 charities, more than any other entertainer." TheWikiholic (talk) 03:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I personally believe his philanthropy should be included as a part of his description. His humanitarianism is woven into his music and what Michael Jackson was most proud of. He became a significant humanitarian figure during the start of the Dangerous era (1991-onwards) and during the 1990s he was at the peak of his fame and popularity meeting with world leaders on a regular basis on the subject of his humanitarian work Never17 (talk) 06:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
That's all great but Wikipedia is based on secondary sources. Popcornfud (talk) 10:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 July 2024

This a very minor request, instead of "Michael Jackson sold around 500 million records" it should be "Michael Jackson sold over 500 million records. All i want changed is one word Never17 (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

 Already done It looks like you have since become extended-confirmed and made the change in this edit. Left guide (talk) 02:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

main template image change suggestion

File:Michael Jackson Dangerous World Tour 1993.jpg

I saw a pic on MJ's zhwiki main template and frankly looked better than that pic on the current main template on enwiki, so i think we can change that pic to this on the left. Coddlebean (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Opinions needed at MJ the Musical

Editors disagree about whether a Guardian review of MJ the Musical should be included in "Critical response" section of the MJ the Musical article. More voices would be appreciated. Thanks. Popcornfud (talk) 13:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Contradictory information in death section

Currently, the death section says:

Jackson died from cardiac arrest, caused by a propofol and benzodiazepine overdose.

…and then says…

Murray had administered propofol, lorazepam, and midazolam; his death was caused by a propofol overdose.

Which one is correct? Nosferattus (talk) 18:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Lorazepam and midazolam are both classified as benzodiazepines, so while both passages are technically correct they could use a rewrite to avoid confusion. 98.159.215.35 (talk) 19:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Infobox image

The image in the infobox is low quality and grainy. I have found a good alternative to it, taken at (arguably) Michael Jackson’s peak. Shall we use this as the replacement?Wcamp9 (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

This looks doubtful as a public domain image. It seems to be a publicity photo and is probably copyrighted.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
I did not upload this, so I would not know the real licensing. For now, though, should we make it Jackson’s main image Wcamp9 (talk) 17:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Not without verifying it is free of copyright. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
A Tineye search shows this photo appearing on Alamy as a stock image.[8] This means that it is almost certainly copyrighted. The image was uploaded by User:ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter who is now indef blocked, and the claim of public domain always looked dodgy.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Read the licensing for this image, the uncropped version:
30x30

Wcamp9 (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I saw this, but it was almost certainly given the wrong license at the time of upload. It is very unlikely that a publicity photo of a major pop star would be public domain. At the very least, it would be copyrighted to the photographer who took it. Without a clear indication of no copyright by the photographer, it cannot be used. This looks like an image found in a web search that has been wrongly licensed, and the presence of the image on Alamy confirms this.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Grammar error

There is a dangling modifier in the "Artistry" section of this article - "he later said that as a small child, his mother would wake him whenever Brown appeared on television". This error can easily be fixed - I'd suggest something like "when he was a small child..." 173.95.86.246 (talk) 16:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done You are correct, that's a dangling modifier. Fixed. Popcornfud (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 September 2024

24.204.196.71 (talk) 14:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takis_(snack)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. GSK (talkedits) 14:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)