Talk:Melbourne Hall

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Derbyshire Mid‑importance

	Derbyshire portal The article on Melbourne Hall is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening Low‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Melbourne Hall appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 August 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Melbourne Hall, Derbyshire, was once the seat of Victorian Prime Minister, William Lamb, 2nd Viscount Melbourne, and thus is the ultimate origin for the naming of Melbourne, Australia?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/August.

Wikipedia

Disconcerting crunch in infobox

The info box has on two adjacent lines (a) that construction was started in the C12 and (b) that the client was Sir John Coke ... who was born in the C17. I see what’s attempted here, but it doesn’t really work well. Is there a way to clarify it and remove this confusing/amusing/unfortunate juxtaposition? Best wishes 82.34.71.202 (talk) 22:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have made a belated attempt. KJP1 (talk) 13:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reference style

I’m planning a bit of a makeover on this. Does anyone have any objection to my using the {{sfn}} ref. style? I know it’s not to everyone’s taste, but it’s the one I’ve become most familiar with. There isn’t actually much that would need changing. Of the four works listed as Sources, only two are actually cited, and we don’t have page numbers for these. KJP1 (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For later use

[1] - slave statues, The Blackamoor and the Georgian Garden
[2] - garden
[3] - garden
[4] - garden
[5] - garden
[6] - the hall, good
[7] - Birdcage
[8] - Muniment room
[9] - Muniment room