Talk:Meant to Live

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Tempo#Beats per minute|beats per minute]] The anchor (#Beats per minute) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Music Videos

The artical states that there were two music videos for this song, but I have heard that there were actually three. However, Iv'e only seen 2 myself, does anyone have the real number for this? --T-rex 16:09, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen all three now, I'll get around to fixing that (the live video is the one missing) --T-rex 17:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UK

this song got up to #21 on the UK top 40

Table

I made this cool table, but then found that this wasn't on nearly as many charts as I thought so I'm storing it here in case it is needed in the future

Chart	Position
US Billboard Hot 100	#18
UK Top 40	#21
US Modern Rock Tracks	#5
US Mainstream Rock Tracks	#36

I'm just going to fill out this information in the infobox. —Akrabbim 15:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Third video

what makes the third video unofficial? --T-rex 21:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. I just assumed it was because it was on youtube, not their official website. —Akrabbim^talk 21:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well WAOT, company car and chem 6a arn't on the offical site either --T-rex 22:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's lots of official things on YouTube...they just didn't originate there.bob rulz 22:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Meant to Live single cover.jpg

Image:Meant to Live single cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christian radio chart performance

Judging from frequent airplay on Christian contemporary music radio, this obviously did well on their charts but I don't see any mention of that. Anyone have actual figures on where this peaked on Christian radio? GBrady (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It actually didn't do well at all on Christian radio until after the mainstream play. And when that happened, it didn't get enough to chart. Joberooni (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Folk rock

A few days ago I looked up this song on Wikipedia because I was listening to it at the time, and then I read the AllMusic review of the song. I noticed that the review mentioned that on the bridge, the song "switches, briefly, to shimmering folk-rock." Because of this mention, I added folk rock to the genre in the infobox, and this edit was later removed, initially with no explanation, and both times without a source. Now, I agree that ideally folk rock should not be in the infobox, as the infobox genres should be broad. But because there is no stylistic discussion in the article, the infobox is the only part of the article that conveys what styles the song falls under, and until such a section is made, the style needs to stay in the infobox. As an aside, folk rock is actually the only style that is cited, though the other two might be sourced, I haven't checked. I think the best solution is 1) find some more sources that discuss genre, 2) create a genre section, and 3) make the genre in the infobox very broad, such as "alternative rock" and maybe also "CCM."--3family6 (talk) 02:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

In my opinion post-grunge best defines this song.71.146.84.229 (talk) 08:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion means very little. However, you provided a citation to the post-grunge mention, so that's fine. But that particular source says that the song picks up "where post-grunge left off" which is not at all saying the song is post-grunge.--¿3family6 _contribs 12:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how your opinion is any better. "where post-grunge left off" is pretty much saying it's post-grunge, plus the fact that they list post-grunge as one of switchfoot's genres. RockMusicLover (talk) 16:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think the song is post-grunge, but the source is worded fairly ambiguously. It seems to be saying the song is "post" post-grunge, which isn't anything at all. As for the tag, the band is tagged as post-grunge, not the song, and the consensus is that Allmusic tags are not reliable anyway, only actual text content.--¿3family6 _contribs 18:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at several other websites, and none of them accurately describe what genre the song is. Allmusic is the closet source I've seen. RockMusicLover (talk) 21:16, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've had trouble finding sources that call it ANY style, except for CCM/Christian.--¿3family6 _contribs 01:20, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: meaning of "inspired by"

Hi.

I was just reading this article to reference the correct album for this song.

As I was reading, I noticed that it says "and was also featured in a UK version of a Spider-Man 2 "inspired by" album": what does this mean? I did a straightforward search of ""inspired by" album" on Google and got no meaningful results. What does an "inspired by" album mean, in this context? In other words, description fail.

Thanks for adjusting.

-Chris Gottservant (talk) 09:12, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Meant to Live. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meant to Live. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021025333/http://www.kenphillipsgroup.com/Phillips/sfguitarworld2.htm to http://www.kenphillipsgroup.com/Phillips/sfguitarworld2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]