User talk:Joberooni

Thank you for experimenting with the page Oh! Gravity. (song) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--T-rex 06:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Joberooni! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 18:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article Perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Switchfoot, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. =David^(talk)_(contribs) 06:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Jonforemanfall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jonforemanfall.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 17:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Is a Yuppie Word

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Happy Is a Yuppie Word, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.brokenmasterpieces.com/archives/001754.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:05.5 Dirty Second Hands - Single (Large).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:05.5 Dirty Second Hands - Single (Large).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lonely Nation - Single.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lonely Nation - Single.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Happy Is a Yuppie Word

An editor has nominated Happy Is a Yuppie Word, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Is a Yuppie Word and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I deleted this article because this is the consensus reached after editors responded to the deletion request. I take a narrow view of the administrator role and rely on the community to discuss the issues involved. If you wish to contest the deletion, you can take the matter to WP:Deletion review. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:04 Stars - Single.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:04 Stars - Single.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appetite for Construction Tour

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Appetite for Construction Tour, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2008 New Switchfoot Album

An editor has nominated 2008 New Switchfoot Album, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 New Switchfoot Album and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:06 Oh! Gravity..jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:06 Oh! Gravity..jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On Fire (Switchfoot song)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article On Fire (Switchfoot song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Switchfoot songs

We both know that those songs are not singles, and never have been. As such there is no reason to be including these songs in charts and the like, and to be honest the songs probably don't even deserve to have articles as per WP:MUSIC. You have to realize that this website is run and organized by the wikipedia community, and not the switchfoot community. thank you. --T-rex 04:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:01 Live in San Diego.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:01 Live in San Diego.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Betrayal (Album)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Betrayal (Album), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Betrayal (Album) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Betrayal (Album), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thebeautifulletdownalt.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thebeautifulletdownalt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Switchfoot

Your recent edit reverted edits that were made in good faith to Switchfoot. Please explain on the talk page why you believe the edits do not improve the article, or at least use an appropriate edit summary to let editors know why you are reverting. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 19:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:03 Learning to Breathe.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:03 Learning to Breathe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Undead Warrior (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lowercasepeople.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lowercasepeople.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FFalbumcover.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:FFalbumcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:48, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:07 The Best Yet Deluxe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:07 The Best Yet Deluxe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Disney

Please do not add Radio Disney, iTunes, or any other chart listed in WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 12:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

's

I can't leave a big enough comment in an edit summary. Believe me, I know this rule. The 's turns into an apostrophe alone only after a plural.

What is the name of Kevin Williams's dog? (singular possessive)
Did you invite the Williamses? (plural, no possessive)
What is the color of the Williamses' house? (plural possessive)

New York Times manual of style, E.B. Strunk, Time magazine, they all agree.—Kww(talk) 05:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Switchfoot an obscure awards

All of the awards are obscure. They're all gone. Thanks for setting the standard. Just because you don't know an award doesn't make it obscure. You need a much better definition of which awards should be kept and which should not. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Limbsandbranches.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Limbsandbranches.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lowercase people

First, you should know that such actions could, conceivably, qualify as WP:Vandalism. Second, may I ask, what do see is accomplished by the removal of the banner? I ask this honestly, because, frankly, I can see absolutely no purpose being served by your doing so. In fact, given that you have seemingly done so more than once, it could be seen that you have WP:OWN difficulties with this article. I will grant you that, at present, the article could be a lot clearer, and could greatly benefit from more frequent reference citations. One of the purposes of placing the banner is to let the related project, and, for that matter, the rest of wikipedia, know the article exists, and to at least potentially draw additional editors to improve it, possibly to GA or FA status. If you can think of other projects which would be applicable, please feel free to add their banners as well. After all, no project can be seen to own an article any more than any individual editor can, as per WP:OWN.

I am now restoring the banner so that the project knows the article exists, as I am perfectly entitled to do by wikipedia policies and guidelines. I regret to say that, should you continue to act in the unilateral way you have now done seemingly more than once, the only thing that might arise from your doing so is some sort of disciplinary sanction. For what it's worth, having the article bannerized with the project's banner also places it on the article alert list, so that we know to send editors to it should any problems arise. I very sincerely urge you to not act in the apparently "owning" way you have now done more than once, or, if you insist on doing so, to alter the article's categorization so it doesn't clearly fall within the scope of the project. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I assumed you were the one who categorized it as such. The downside is every article has to be categorized for anyone to know its out there. If you don't think it honestly belongs in that category, then feel free to change it to some other category. Also, if you honestly feel that the article fits better into the scope of some other project, most of which can be found at WP:PROJDIR, by all means add their banner as well. I don't want to "own" the article anymore than anyone else, but it is more or less incumbent on someone to find some group of editors, which generally means WikiProject, who is willing to help maintain the article. Vandalism of all kinds happens a lot, believe me. I think I personally have reverted obvious vandalism on Martin Luther ten times myself, not counting all the other editors who have also done so. By all means feel free to add the article to as many categories as you wish, provided that they aren't parent/child categories of each other (like, for instance, Category:People from Chicago and Category:People from Illinois, in which event you need add only the most specific one). John Carter (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vice Verses

The article Vice Verses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not much known about album. WP:HAMMER time? ^TheWeak_Willed 22:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^TheWeak_Willed 22:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Vice Verses

I have nominated Vice Verses, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vice Verses. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ^TheWeak_Willed 20:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Always (Switchfoot song)

A tag has been placed on Always (Switchfoot song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Andrew Duffell (talk) 23:36, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Switchfoot. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Ἀλήθεια 22:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Appetite For Construction Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Appetite For Construction Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Appetite For Construction Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Appetite For Construction Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 17:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Appetite For Construction Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Appetite For Construction Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jon Foreman Winter EP.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jon Foreman Winter EP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Vice Verses

I have nominated Vice Verses, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vice Verses (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vice Verses

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vice Verses, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/vice-verses-2.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:49, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Moosebutter-StarWars.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moosebutter-StarWars.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dark Horses

The article Dark Horses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NSONGS Not yet released, not charted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 19:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dark Horses for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dark Horses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Horses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 12:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vice Verses

I took a look at this article and saw lots of repeated references, improper references, and just plain wrong references. Please read Wikipedia:Bombardment,WP:ELNO, and the style guidelines for referencing as I've reduced the size of this article by a little over 25 percent by removing fansites, personal blogs, and naming references. Hasteur (talk) 13:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ITunes Session (Switchfoot EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITunes Session (Switchfoot EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Session (Switchfoot EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Status (talk · contribs) 13:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2010 iTunes Session.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2010 iTunes Session.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UpInArmsTour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UpInArmsTour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:05.5 Dirty Second Hands - Single (Large).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:05.5 Dirty Second Hands - Single (Large).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]