Talk:Marge Frantz/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 22:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can attend to shortly. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for picking this one up Eddie891 Please ping me when you are ready for me to review the comments, as I am hip deep in women's nationality. SusunW (talk) 22:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"and began work at the Board of Economic Warfare" Might benefit from a brief explanation of context

Done SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

University of California, Berkeley is linked on its second mention in the body, but not the first

Done SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"She completed her bachelor's degree with distinction" I'm unfamiliar with what "with distinction" means -- is it a formal recognition?

Yes, it means she had a high grade point average. According to UC Berkeley's website, it says it is roughly equivalent to cum laude, so I added a link. If that suffices, Done. SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it "UC, Santa Cruz" or "UC Santa Cruz"?

Typically if it is the University of California, X there is a comma, but UC X if you are abbreviating. I fixed the one instance with a comma. Done SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So whatever happened to her husband?

(He died ;)? Sorry, I couldn't help myself.) It doesn't appear that they ever divorced, both obits call them spouse's but acknowledge the later partner. SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it "Scharr" or "Schaar"?

Two "a"s. Fixed it throughout. Done SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some more to come, will ping when done Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources all reliable, nothing really to add-- Really nice work, just some very minor things. Answering my own question about what happened to her husband, I see now "Frantz's husband began a partnership in Palo Alto with Miriam Patchen". Could you maybe clarify this is a romantic partnership (if it is), not work partnership (as I thought initially). Really nicely done. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to read romantic partners in one place and relationship in another. Thank you so much for the review Eddie891. Always a joy to work with you. Let me know if there are any other outstanding issues. SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is clearly at the GA status, nothing further to add. Well done as always. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]