Jump to content

Talk:Mansfield Hotel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk20:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Mansfield Hotel
The Mansfield Hotel

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mansfield Hotel; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: @Epicgenius: Good article. Just waiting on a QPQ. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approve now that the qpq has been added. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mansfield Hotel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 22:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 08:36, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


@Epicgenius: taking this review. This is my second GA review in a while so thought this would be a nice start. 750h+ 08:36, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

prose

[edit]
lead
  • The building is a New York City designated landmark. correct me i'm wrong but there's usually a hyphen between "City" and "designated"
    • An endash or a hyphen would be appropriate if it were the city doing the designating, and the NYC government is sometimes referred to as "the City". However, cities themselves are not sentient beings, so I would say "no" in this case. This wording is akin to "designated landmark of New York City". Epicgenius (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • large lobby with coffered ceiling ==> "large lobby with a coffered ceiling"
site
architecture
history
critical reception

source/image review

[edit]

Sources and images look good. Happy to pass once above concerns are addressed @Epicgenius:. Sorry for the delay 750h+ 08:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review 750h+. I've addressed all your concerns now. Epicgenius (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.