Jump to content

Talk:Manhunt 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeManhunt 2 was a Video games good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 2, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
December 22, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee


Renomination

[edit]

I was the one who nominated the article and was also one of its editors. Unfortunately I was absent from Wikipedia for two months when the review actually happened, and thus was not present to help out in the review (but I was HERE when it was still in the nom list). Sorry David Fuchs if you reviewed the game without any progress from your evaluation. The other main editors were busy fixing the Red Dead Redemption article (which was also a GA review). I will try to fix the article, and nominate it for another run as a GA. Godzilladude123 (talk)


Re: Finished editing the article for another nomination. Will wait less than a week for final editings. Then to the nominations. Godzilladude123 (talk) 04:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For what its worth, I'd just like to add my eight cents. I think the longer version of the article is far superior to this edited version. As someone who has used this article for professional purposes, I think removing the Chronology of events table is a grave error, it was a great at-a-glance reference tool for a complex sequence of events. Taking it out is a perfect example of the awful homogenization that happens when good, thorough articles are submitted for GA/FA review and get reduced down to bare essentials. A lot of very well researched and well written info has been removed for no reason other than getting the article up to GA standard. Also, shouldn't User:Bertaut be consulted in all this, as he wrote the vast majority of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.19.85 (talk) 15:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No. If you read the GA Review above, the reviewer stated that the controversy is better as a prose than a timeline. And don't worry, the editors didn't reduce it down to "bare essentials". We just trimmed the aweful amount of quotation that made reading a chore, as per Wikipedia:Quotations rule. The gameplay too was fixed, and the heading was expanded. Those were the only ones that were changed. No major infos were touched. The rest are scot free. And this User:Bertaut, I don't know about him/her but he didn't showed up when the article was being reviewed for almost two months.Godzilladude123 (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Script Error

[edit]

There's this script error in the reception section, and I have no idea on how to remove it without removing the score table. PLEASE HELP!180.190.137.222 (talk) 13:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Manhunt 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Manhunt 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Manhunt 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Red Kings" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Red Kings and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Red Kings until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Red Kings" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Red Kings and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § The Red Kings until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Project Militia" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Project Militia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Project Militia until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Project Militia" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Project Militia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § The Project Militia until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Dr. Pickman" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dr. Pickman and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Dr. Pickman until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Judy Sender" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Judy Sender and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Judy Sender until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bloodhounds" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Bloodhounds and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § The Bloodhounds until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genre of manhunt 2

[edit]

Show ne any proofs that games genre box/descriptions should contain only the primary genres. Its visivle from the games box art its a horror . And inter et spurces claim it to be one MrDante1047 (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You continue making unsourced genre changes despite the discussions we had for other games and numerous reverts by various users. This game has a horror settings, but is not in the survival horror genre. It has been specifically described as unique horr-stealth game and not survival horror. The template docs also require not to include thematic genres. In the future, please get consensus before edit warring. IceWelder [✉] 11:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Horror isnt the secondary genre of this game rather than the first one. Its box art tells its a horror as well.s stealth. Wikipedia editers are becoming more and more self roghteous and dismissing others points.
Plese lets include in the description article that its a horror stealth video game 46.71.132.92 (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Horror" is a theme, not a genre. IceWelder [✉] 17:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Horror is a full fledged genre not a theme
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horror_game#:~:text=A%20horror%20game%20is%20a,a%20variety%20of%20gameplay%20types. 46.70.127.166 (talk) 19:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
dont you know about survival horror as well as psychological horror genres exist to say "horror is not a genre" ,google it up tp be sure for yourself 46.70.127.166 (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
However edots wikipedia ,if you are an editor you shoullb be basing it i
up on facts rather youre own feeling,factual evidences exost and reading articles,literatire will expose people to genres,googling also does help. Wikipedia editors shouldnt be self righteous. Just "horror as game genre" my source whoch is the wikipedia article shows sources for horror being a ganre in games 46.70.127.166 (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survival_horror
Proof of horror being a genre with references 46.70.127.166 (talk) 19:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia can't be used for references on Wikipedia. Please find an independent, reliable source that considers Manhunt 2 a survival horror game. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.gamesradar.com/manhunt-2-13/
Dear SOETERMANS i war arguing.over Manhunt 2 being a horror-stealth game and showed facts that "horror" genre as a whole does exist in games rather than ICE Welder claiming its a theme not a genre of its own.
This is article from games radar claiming it to be a stealth-horror i showed facts that horror games exist not as a theme, i see no reason why we cant describe this game as horror and stealth game, firstly horror if its what it is 46.70.127.166 (talk) 21:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is spam by the indef-blocked user that started the discussion. Please WP:DENY. IceWelder [✉] 07:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The gameplay is pure stealth, it doesnt have any survival horror elements in its gameplay --FMSky (talk) 05:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Manhunt_2&oldid=1208764277"