Talk:Mamorukun Curse!
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Mamoru-kun wa Norowarete Shimatta!)
On 4 February 2014, it was proposed that this article be moved from Mamoru-kun wa Norowarete Shimatta! to Mamorukun Curse!. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved Xoloz (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Mamoru-kun wa Norowarete Shimatta! → Mamorukun Curse! – The game has been localized and it has received an English name. Link for reference. Relisted. BDD (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Jotamide (talk) 20:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Kun is a title, and instead of removing the hyphen, it should be replaced with a space, or kun not be there at all. ミーラー強斗武 (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- I have no idea as I don't speak Japanese. However, that's how it is spelled on the official website of the game. Jotamide (talk) 06:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
It would be wrong considering what Mira said. However, WP:NCVG says to use an English title, if existent. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- I agree, it may ot be correct but if we add a - or remove kun that would be a case Wikipedia creating its own title and I don't think that's permitted. This is different than removing decorative symbols or not using excessive capitalization sine it changes the title itself.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia wouldn't be creating a title; it was created by its publisher. WP:NCVG asserts to use the title of English distribution (period) Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- I am aware of that. I was actually referencing the earlier post Kun is a title, and instead of removing the hyphen, it should be replaced with a space, or kun not be there at all when I was talking about Wikipedia creating a title since neither the current or proposed title has a space or lacks kun.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- I know that gramatically/orthographically would be wrong to attach "kun" with a proper noun, but if UFO Interactive Games don't worried about that, I shouldn't too.
- I am aware of that. I was actually referencing the earlier post Kun is a title, and instead of removing the hyphen, it should be replaced with a space, or kun not be there at all when I was talking about Wikipedia creating a title since neither the current or proposed title has a space or lacks kun.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia wouldn't be creating a title; it was created by its publisher. WP:NCVG asserts to use the title of English distribution (period) Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- I agree, it may ot be correct but if we add a - or remove kun that would be a case Wikipedia creating its own title and I don't think that's permitted. This is different than removing decorative symbols or not using excessive capitalization sine it changes the title itself.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support - There is now an official English title and it should be used to title the article. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support - per above. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.